[merged mm-stable] mm-memory-check-userfaultfd_wp-in-vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp.patch removed from -mm tree

[merged mm-stable] mm-memory-check-userfaultfd_wp-in-vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp.patch removed from -mm tree

[Andrew Morton]

The quilt patch titled
     Subject: mm: memory: check userfaultfd_wp() in vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp()
has been removed from the -mm tree.  Its filename was
     mm-memory-check-userfaultfd_wp-in-vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp.patch

This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

------------------------------------------------------
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Subject: mm: memory: check userfaultfd_wp() in vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp()
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 11:00:39 +0800

Add userfaultfd_wp() check in vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp() to avoid the
unnecessary FAULT_FLAG_ORIG_PTE_VALID check/pte_marker_entry_uffd_wp() in
most pagefault, note, the function vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp() is not inlined
in the two kernel versions, the difference is shown below,

perf date,

  perf report -i perf.data.before | grep vmf
     0.17%     0.13%  lat_pagefault  [kernel.kallsyms]      [k] vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp.part.0.isra.0
  perf report -i perf.data.after  | grep vmf

lat_pagefault -W 5 -N 5 /tmp/XXX
  latency              before        after        diff
  average(8 tests)     0.262675      0.2600375   -0.0026375

Although it's a small, but the uffd_wp is a new feature than previous
kernel, when the vma is not registered with UFFD_WP, let's avoid to
execute the new logical, also adding __always_inline attribute to
vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp(), which make set_pte_range() only check VM_UFFD_WP
flags without the function call.  In addition, directly call the
vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp() in do_anonymous_page() and set_pte_range() to save
an uffd_wp variable.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240422030039.3293568-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/memory.c |   10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/memory.c~mm-memory-check-userfaultfd_wp-in-vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp
+++ a/mm/memory.c
@@ -112,8 +112,10 @@ static bool vmf_pte_changed(struct vm_fa
  * Return true if the original pte was a uffd-wp pte marker (so the pte was
  * wr-protected).
  */
-static bool vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp(struct vm_fault *vmf)
+static __always_inline bool vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 {
+	if (!userfaultfd_wp(vmf->vma))
+		return false;
 	if (!(vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_ORIG_PTE_VALID))
 		return false;
 
@@ -4393,7 +4395,6 @@ fallback:
  */
 static vm_fault_t do_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf)
 {
-	bool uffd_wp = vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp(vmf);
 	struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
 	unsigned long addr = vmf->address;
 	struct folio *folio;
@@ -4493,7 +4494,7 @@ static vm_fault_t do_anonymous_page(stru
 	folio_add_new_anon_rmap(folio, vma, addr);
 	folio_add_lru_vma(folio, vma);
 setpte:
-	if (uffd_wp)
+	if (vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp(vmf))
 		entry = pte_mkuffd_wp(entry);
 	set_ptes(vma->vm_mm, addr, vmf->pte, entry, nr_pages);
 
@@ -4668,7 +4669,6 @@ void set_pte_range(struct vm_fault *vmf,
 		struct page *page, unsigned int nr, unsigned long addr)
 {
 	struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
-	bool uffd_wp = vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp(vmf);
 	bool write = vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
 	bool prefault = in_range(vmf->address, addr, nr * PAGE_SIZE);
 	pte_t entry;
@@ -4683,7 +4683,7 @@ void set_pte_range(struct vm_fault *vmf,
 
 	if (write)
 		entry = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(entry), vma);
-	if (unlikely(uffd_wp))
+	if (unlikely(vmf_orig_pte_uffd_wp(vmf)))
 		entry = pte_mkuffd_wp(entry);
 	/* copy-on-write page */
 	if (write && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) {
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com are