From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
"Maxime Chevallier" <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
"Herve Codina" <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Heiner Kallweit" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"Vladimir Oltean" <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
"Köry Maincent" <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>,
"Jesse Brandeburg" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
"Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>,
"Piergiorgio Beruto" <piergiorgio.beruto@gmail.com>,
"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
"Nicolò Veronese" <nicveronese@gmail.com>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
mwojtas@chromium.org, "Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>,
"Antoine Tenart" <atenart@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: phy: phy_link_topology: Lazy-initialize the link topology
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 07:08:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202405080732.pSwJSarc-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240507102822.2023826-3-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Hi Maxime,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on net-next/main]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Maxime-Chevallier/net-phy-phy_link_topology-Pass-netdevice-to-phy_link_topo-helpers/20240507-183130
base: net-next/main
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240507102822.2023826-3-maxime.chevallier%40bootlin.com
patch subject: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: phy: phy_link_topology: Lazy-initialize the link topology
config: parisc-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240508/202405080732.pSwJSarc-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: hppa-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240508/202405080732.pSwJSarc-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405080732.pSwJSarc-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> net/core/dev.c:10276:13: warning: 'netdev_free_phy_link_topology' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
10276 | static void netdev_free_phy_link_topology(struct net_device *dev)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/netdev_free_phy_link_topology +10276 net/core/dev.c
10275
10276 static void netdev_free_phy_link_topology(struct net_device *dev)
10277 {
10278 struct phy_link_topology *topo = dev->link_topo;
10279
10280 if (!topo)
10281 return;
10282
10283 xa_destroy(&topo->phys);
10284 kfree(topo);
10285 dev->link_topo = NULL;
10286 }
10287
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
"Maxime Chevallier" <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
"Herve Codina" <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Heiner Kallweit" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"Vladimir Oltean" <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
"Köry Maincent" <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>,
"Jesse Brandeburg" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
"Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>,
"Piergiorgio Beruto" <piergiorgio.beruto@gmail.com>,
"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
"Nicolò Veronese" <nicveronese@gmail.com>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
mwojtas@chromium.org, "Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>,
"Antoine Tenart" <atenart@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: phy: phy_link_topology: Lazy-initialize the link topology
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 07:08:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202405080732.pSwJSarc-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240507102822.2023826-3-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Hi Maxime,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on net-next/main]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Maxime-Chevallier/net-phy-phy_link_topology-Pass-netdevice-to-phy_link_topo-helpers/20240507-183130
base: net-next/main
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240507102822.2023826-3-maxime.chevallier%40bootlin.com
patch subject: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: phy: phy_link_topology: Lazy-initialize the link topology
config: parisc-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240508/202405080732.pSwJSarc-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: hppa-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240508/202405080732.pSwJSarc-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405080732.pSwJSarc-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> net/core/dev.c:10276:13: warning: 'netdev_free_phy_link_topology' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
10276 | static void netdev_free_phy_link_topology(struct net_device *dev)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/netdev_free_phy_link_topology +10276 net/core/dev.c
10275
10276 static void netdev_free_phy_link_topology(struct net_device *dev)
10277 {
10278 struct phy_link_topology *topo = dev->link_topo;
10279
10280 if (!topo)
10281 return;
10282
10283 xa_destroy(&topo->phys);
10284 kfree(topo);
10285 dev->link_topo = NULL;
10286 }
10287
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-07 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-07 10:28 [PATCH net-next 0/2] Fix phy_link_topology initialization Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-07 10:28 ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-07 10:28 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: phy: phy_link_topology: Pass netdevice to phy_link_topo helpers Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-07 10:28 ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-08 5:43 ` Heiner Kallweit
2024-05-08 5:43 ` Heiner Kallweit
2024-05-07 10:28 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: phy: phy_link_topology: Lazy-initialize the link topology Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-07 10:28 ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-07 23:08 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-05-07 23:08 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-08 5:44 ` Heiner Kallweit
2024-05-08 5:44 ` Heiner Kallweit
2024-05-13 7:30 ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-13 7:30 ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-13 8:07 ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-13 8:07 ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-13 8:15 ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-13 8:15 ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-13 6:36 ` [PATCH net-next 0/2] Fix phy_link_topology initialization Nathan Chancellor
2024-05-13 6:36 ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-05-13 9:15 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-05-13 9:15 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2024-05-13 15:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-05-13 15:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-05-14 6:46 ` Maxime Chevallier
2024-05-14 6:46 ` Maxime Chevallier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202405080732.pSwJSarc-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=atenart@kernel.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=kabel@kernel.org \
--cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=mwojtas@chromium.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicveronese@gmail.com \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=piergiorgio.beruto@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.