From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>,
"Luis Chamberlain" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
"Joel Granados" <j.granados@samsung.com>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Dave Chinner" <david@fromorbit.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
bridge@lists.linux.dev, lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] sysctl: treewide: constify ctl_table argument of sysctl handlers
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 18:00:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240508180003.548af21b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202405080959.104A73A914@keescook>
On Wed, 8 May 2024 10:11:35 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
> > Split this per subsystem, please.
>
> I've done a few painful API transitions before, and I don't think the
> complexity of these changes needs a per-subsystem constification pass. I
> think this series is the right approach, but that patch 11 will need
> coordination with Linus. We regularly do system-wide prototype changes
> like this right at the end of the merge window before -rc1 comes out.
Right. I didn't read the code closely enough before responding.
Chalk my response up to being annoyed by the constant stream of
cross-tree changes in procfs without proper cover letter explaining
how they will be merged :|
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>,
"Luis Chamberlain" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
"Joel Granados" <j.granados@samsung.com>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Dave Chinner" <david@fromorbit.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
bridge@lists.linux.dev, lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] sysctl: treewide: constify ctl_table argument of sysctl handlers
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 18:00:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240508180003.548af21b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202405080959.104A73A914@keescook>
On Wed, 8 May 2024 10:11:35 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
> > Split this per subsystem, please.
>
> I've done a few painful API transitions before, and I don't think the
> complexity of these changes needs a per-subsystem constification pass. I
> think this series is the right approach, but that patch 11 will need
> coordination with Linus. We regularly do system-wide prototype changes
> like this right at the end of the merge window before -rc1 comes out.
Right. I didn't read the code closely enough before responding.
Chalk my response up to being annoyed by the constant stream of
cross-tree changes in procfs without proper cover letter explaining
how they will be merged :|
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>,
"Luis Chamberlain" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
"Joel Granados" <j.granados@samsung.com>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Dave Chinner" <david@fromorbit.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
bridge@lists.linux.dev, lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] sysctl: treewide: constify ctl_table argument of sysctl handlers
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 18:00:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240508180003.548af21b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202405080959.104A73A914@keescook>
On Wed, 8 May 2024 10:11:35 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
> > Split this per subsystem, please.
>
> I've done a few painful API transitions before, and I don't think the
> complexity of these changes needs a per-subsystem constification pass. I
> think this series is the right approach, but that patch 11 will need
> coordination with Linus. We regularly do system-wide prototype changes
> like this right at the end of the merge window before -rc1 comes out.
Right. I didn't read the code closely enough before responding.
Chalk my response up to being annoyed by the constant stream of
cross-tree changes in procfs without proper cover letter explaining
how they will be merged :|
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "Joel Granados" <j.granados@samsung.com>,
"Dave Chinner" <david@fromorbit.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
"Luis Chamberlain" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org,
coreteam@netfilter.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bridge@lists.linux.dev, apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org,
"Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] sysctl: treewide: constify ctl_table argument of sysctl handlers
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 18:00:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240508180003.548af21b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202405080959.104A73A914@keescook>
On Wed, 8 May 2024 10:11:35 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
> > Split this per subsystem, please.
>
> I've done a few painful API transitions before, and I don't think the
> complexity of these changes needs a per-subsystem constification pass. I
> think this series is the right approach, but that patch 11 will need
> coordination with Linus. We regularly do system-wide prototype changes
> like this right at the end of the merge window before -rc1 comes out.
Right. I didn't read the code closely enough before responding.
Chalk my response up to being annoyed by the constant stream of
cross-tree changes in procfs without proper cover letter explaining
how they will be merged :|
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>,
"Luis Chamberlain" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
"Joel Granados" <j.granados@samsung.com>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Dave Chinner" <david@fromorbit.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
bridge@lists.linux.dev, lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] sysctl: treewide: constify ctl_table argument of sysctl handlers
Date: Wed, 8 May 2024 18:00:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240508180003.548af21b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202405080959.104A73A914@keescook>
On Wed, 8 May 2024 10:11:35 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
> > Split this per subsystem, please.
>
> I've done a few painful API transitions before, and I don't think the
> complexity of these changes needs a per-subsystem constification pass. I
> think this series is the right approach, but that patch 11 will need
> coordination with Linus. We regularly do system-wide prototype changes
> like this right at the end of the merge window before -rc1 comes out.
Right. I didn't read the code closely enough before responding.
Chalk my response up to being annoyed by the constant stream of
cross-tree changes in procfs without proper cover letter explaining
how they will be merged :|
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-09 1:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 144+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20240423075608eucas1p265e7c90f3efd6995cb240b3d2688b803@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2024-04-23 7:54 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] sysctl: treewide: constify ctl_table argument of sysctl handlers Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] stackleak: don't modify ctl_table argument Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] cgroup: bpf: constify ctl_table arguments and fields Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] hugetlb: constify ctl_table arguments of utility functions Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] utsname: constify ctl_table arguments of utility function Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] neighbour: " Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] ipv4/sysctl: constify ctl_table arguments of utility functions Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] ipv6/addrconf: " Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] ipv6/ndisc: constify ctl_table arguments of utility function Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] ipvs: constify ctl_table arguments of utility functions Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] sysctl: constify ctl_table arguments of utility function Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] sysctl: treewide: constify the ctl_table argument of handlers Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-23 7:54 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-29 9:47 ` Heiko Carstens
2024-04-29 9:47 ` Heiko Carstens
2024-04-29 9:47 ` Heiko Carstens
2024-04-29 9:47 ` Heiko Carstens
2024-04-29 9:47 ` Heiko Carstens
2024-04-23 18:31 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] sysctl: treewide: constify ctl_table argument of sysctl handlers Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-23 18:31 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-23 18:31 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-23 18:31 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-23 18:31 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-25 3:12 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-25 3:12 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-25 3:12 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-25 3:12 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-25 3:12 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-04-25 7:10 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-25 7:10 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-25 7:10 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-25 7:10 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-25 7:10 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-27 7:40 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-27 7:40 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-27 7:40 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-27 7:40 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-27 7:40 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-25 11:04 ` Joel Granados
2024-04-25 11:04 ` Joel Granados
2024-04-25 11:04 ` Joel Granados
2024-04-25 11:04 ` Joel Granados
2024-04-25 11:04 ` Joel Granados
2024-04-25 20:34 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-25 20:34 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-25 20:34 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-25 20:34 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-04-25 20:34 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-05-08 11:37 ` Joel Granados
2024-05-08 11:37 ` Joel Granados
2024-05-08 11:37 ` Joel Granados
2024-05-08 11:37 ` Joel Granados
2024-05-08 11:37 ` Joel Granados
2024-05-08 17:11 ` Kees Cook
2024-05-08 17:11 ` Kees Cook
2024-05-08 17:11 ` Kees Cook
2024-05-08 17:11 ` Kees Cook
2024-05-08 17:11 ` Kees Cook
2024-05-09 1:00 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-05-09 1:00 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-05-09 1:00 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-05-09 1:00 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-05-09 1:00 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-05-11 9:51 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-05-11 9:51 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-05-11 9:51 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-05-11 9:51 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-05-11 9:51 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-05-12 19:32 ` Joel Granados
2024-05-12 19:32 ` Joel Granados
2024-05-12 19:32 ` Joel Granados
2024-05-12 19:32 ` Joel Granados
2024-05-12 19:32 ` Joel Granados
2024-05-13 2:57 ` Kees Cook
2024-05-13 2:57 ` Kees Cook
2024-05-13 2:57 ` Kees Cook
2024-05-13 2:57 ` Kees Cook
2024-05-13 2:57 ` Kees Cook
2024-05-12 19:24 ` Joel Granados
2024-05-12 19:24 ` Joel Granados
2024-05-12 19:24 ` Joel Granados
2024-05-12 19:24 ` Joel Granados
2024-05-12 19:24 ` Joel Granados
2024-05-03 9:03 ` Joel Granados
2024-05-03 9:03 ` Joel Granados
2024-05-03 9:03 ` Joel Granados
2024-05-03 9:03 ` Joel Granados
2024-05-03 9:03 ` Joel Granados
2024-05-03 14:09 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-05-03 14:09 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-05-03 14:09 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-05-03 14:09 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-05-03 14:09 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2024-05-08 11:40 ` Joel Granados
2024-05-08 11:40 ` Joel Granados
2024-05-08 11:40 ` Joel Granados
2024-05-08 11:40 ` Joel Granados
2024-05-08 11:40 ` Joel Granados
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240508180003.548af21b@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=j.granados@samsung.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rds-devel@oss.oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.