From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
brauner@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, laoar.shao@gmail.com,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, longman@redhat.com,
walters@verbum.org, wangkai86@huawei.com, willy@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: move dentry shrinking outside the inode lock in 'rmdir()'
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 17:33:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240513163332.GK2118490@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wgZU=TFEeiLoBjki1DJZEBWUb00oqJdddTCJxsMZrJUfQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 08:58:33AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> We *could* strive for a hybrid approach, where we handle the common
> case ("not a ton of child dentries") differently, and just get rid of
> them synchronously, and handle the "millions of children" case by
> unhashing the directory and dealing with shrinking the children async.
try_to_shrink_children()? Doable, and not even that hard to do, but
as for shrinking async... We can easily move it out of inode_lock
on parent, but doing that really async would either need to be
tied into e.g. remount r/o logics or we'd get userland regressions.
I mean, "I have an opened unlinked file, can't remount r/o" is one
thing, but "I've done rm -rf ~luser, can't remount r/o for a while"
when all luser's processes had been killed and nothing is holding
any of that opened... ouch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-13 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-11 2:27 [RFC PATCH] fs: dcache: Delete the associated dentry when deleting a file Yafang Shao
2024-05-11 2:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-11 3:35 ` Yafang Shao
2024-05-11 4:54 ` Waiman Long
2024-05-11 15:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-11 16:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-11 16:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-11 18:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-11 18:26 ` [PATCH] vfs: move dentry shrinking outside the inode lock in 'rmdir()' Linus Torvalds
2024-05-11 18:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-11 19:28 ` Al Viro
2024-05-11 19:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-11 20:31 ` Al Viro
2024-05-11 21:17 ` Al Viro
2024-05-12 15:45 ` James Bottomley
2024-05-12 16:16 ` Al Viro
2024-05-12 19:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-12 20:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-13 5:31 ` Al Viro
2024-05-13 15:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-13 16:33 ` Al Viro [this message]
2024-05-13 16:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-23 7:18 ` Dave Chinner
2024-05-11 20:02 ` [PATCH v2] " Linus Torvalds
2024-05-12 3:06 ` Yafang Shao
2024-05-12 3:30 ` Al Viro
2024-05-12 3:36 ` Yafang Shao
2024-05-11 19:24 ` [PATCH] " Al Viro
2024-05-15 2:18 ` [RFC PATCH] fs: dcache: Delete the associated dentry when deleting a file Yafang Shao
2024-05-15 2:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-15 9:17 ` [PATCH] vfs: " Yafang Shao
2024-05-15 16:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-16 13:44 ` Oliver Sang
2024-05-22 8:51 ` Oliver Sang
2024-05-23 2:21 ` Yafang Shao
2024-05-22 8:11 ` kernel test robot
2024-05-22 16:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-22 17:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-05-22 18:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-05-11 3:36 ` [RFC PATCH] fs: dcache: " Al Viro
2024-05-11 3:51 ` Yafang Shao
2024-05-11 5:18 ` Al Viro
2024-05-11 5:32 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240513163332.GK2118490@ZenIV \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=walters@verbum.org \
--cc=wangkai86@huawei.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.