From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
cristian.marussi@arm.com, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, festevam@gmail.com,
imx@lists.linux.dev, aisheng.dong@nxp.com,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Add properties for i.MX95 Pinctrl OEM extensions
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 14:49:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240520194942.GA1374705-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240516073012.1699795-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 03:30:12PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>
> i.MX95 Pinctrl is managed by System Control Management Interface(SCMI)
> firmware using OEM extensions. No functions, no groups are provided by
> the firmware. So add i.MX95 specific properties.
>
> To keep aligned with current i.MX pinctrl bindings, still use "fsl,pins"
> for i.MX95.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
>
> V1:
> There is already a v6 version for i.MX95 pinctrl with binding got reviewed by
> Rob, https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240513-pinctrl-scmi-oem-v3-v6-1-904975c99cc4@nxp.com/
> But after NXP internal discussion, to keep "fsl,pins" for i.MX95 would make
> it aligned with current i.MX93/8M/7 bindings which people are familiar with,
> and easy to understand.
>
> Sorry to bring back so late after your reviewing in previous generic binding
> patch. This is not to reject the v6 patch, just wanna to see whether you are
> happy with "fsl,pins" for i.MX95. If people are happy to accept, I will post
> out driver together with this patch in new patchset to reject v6. If people are
> not happy, we could continue with v6.
It is fine for me.
Rob
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
cristian.marussi@arm.com, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, festevam@gmail.com,
imx@lists.linux.dev, aisheng.dong@nxp.com,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Add properties for i.MX95 Pinctrl OEM extensions
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 14:49:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240520194942.GA1374705-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240516073012.1699795-1-peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 03:30:12PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
>
> i.MX95 Pinctrl is managed by System Control Management Interface(SCMI)
> firmware using OEM extensions. No functions, no groups are provided by
> the firmware. So add i.MX95 specific properties.
>
> To keep aligned with current i.MX pinctrl bindings, still use "fsl,pins"
> for i.MX95.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
>
> V1:
> There is already a v6 version for i.MX95 pinctrl with binding got reviewed by
> Rob, https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240513-pinctrl-scmi-oem-v3-v6-1-904975c99cc4@nxp.com/
> But after NXP internal discussion, to keep "fsl,pins" for i.MX95 would make
> it aligned with current i.MX93/8M/7 bindings which people are familiar with,
> and easy to understand.
>
> Sorry to bring back so late after your reviewing in previous generic binding
> patch. This is not to reject the v6 patch, just wanna to see whether you are
> happy with "fsl,pins" for i.MX95. If people are happy to accept, I will post
> out driver together with this patch in new patchset to reject v6. If people are
> not happy, we could continue with v6.
It is fine for me.
Rob
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-20 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-16 7:30 [RFC] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Add properties for i.MX95 Pinctrl OEM extensions Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-05-16 7:30 ` Peng Fan (OSS)
2024-05-16 14:40 ` Frank Li
2024-05-16 14:40 ` Frank Li
2024-05-21 6:16 ` Peng Fan
2024-05-21 6:16 ` Peng Fan
2024-05-20 19:49 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2024-05-20 19:49 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240520194942.GA1374705-robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=aisheng.dong@nxp.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.