All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
	coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Suzuki Poulouse <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coresight: Fix ref leak when of_coresight_parse_endpoint() fails
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 21:48:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024052957-overload-darkroom-8c4d@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ce2530fd-d91b-4629-944f-9d7c6826aaa9@web.de>

On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 09:30:11PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> …
> > Fix it by dropping the refcount in the exit condition.
> 
>                          reference counter?
> 
> How do you think about to use the summary phrase
> “Fix reference counting leak in of_get_coresight_platform_data()”?
> 
> Regards,
> Markus

Hi,

This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list.  I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore.  Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.

Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all.  The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback.  Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
	coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Suzuki Poulouse <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
	Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coresight: Fix ref leak when of_coresight_parse_endpoint() fails
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 21:48:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024052957-overload-darkroom-8c4d@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ce2530fd-d91b-4629-944f-9d7c6826aaa9@web.de>

On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 09:30:11PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> …
> > Fix it by dropping the refcount in the exit condition.
> 
>                          reference counter?
> 
> How do you think about to use the summary phrase
> “Fix reference counting leak in of_get_coresight_platform_data()”?
> 
> Regards,
> Markus

Hi,

This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list.  I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore.  Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.

Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all.  The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback.  Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-29 19:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-29 13:36 [PATCH] coresight: Fix ref leak when of_coresight_parse_endpoint() fails James Clark
2024-05-29 13:36 ` James Clark
2024-05-29 13:52 ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-05-29 13:52   ` Laurent Pinchart
2024-05-29 19:30 ` Markus Elfring
2024-05-29 19:30   ` Markus Elfring
2024-05-29 19:48   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2024-05-29 19:48     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-06-10  9:47 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2024-06-10  9:47   ` Suzuki K Poulose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2024052957-overload-darkroom-8c4d@gregkh \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=james.clark@arm.com \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
    --cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.