From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>,
peterx@redhat.com, oliver.sang@intel.com, paulmck@kernel.org,
david@redhat.com, willy@infradead.org, riel@surriel.com,
vivek.kasireddy@intel.com, cl@linux.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, yang@os.amperecomputing.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: gup: do not call try_grab_folio() in slow path
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 10:57:13 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202406051039.9m00gwIx-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240604234858.948986-2-yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
Hi Yang,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Yang-Shi/mm-gup-do-not-call-try_grab_folio-in-slow-path/20240605-075027
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240604234858.948986-2-yang%40os.amperecomputing.com
patch subject: [PATCH 2/2] mm: gup: do not call try_grab_folio() in slow path
config: openrisc-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240605/202406051039.9m00gwIx-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240605/202406051039.9m00gwIx-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202406051039.9m00gwIx-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> mm/gup.c:131:22: warning: 'try_grab_folio_fast' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
131 | static struct folio *try_grab_folio_fast(struct page *page, int refs,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/try_grab_folio_fast +131 mm/gup.c
101
102 /**
103 * try_grab_folio_fast() - Attempt to get or pin a folio in fast path.
104 * @page: pointer to page to be grabbed
105 * @refs: the value to (effectively) add to the folio's refcount
106 * @flags: gup flags: these are the FOLL_* flag values.
107 *
108 * "grab" names in this file mean, "look at flags to decide whether to use
109 * FOLL_PIN or FOLL_GET behavior, when incrementing the folio's refcount.
110 *
111 * Either FOLL_PIN or FOLL_GET (or neither) must be set, but not both at the
112 * same time. (That's true throughout the get_user_pages*() and
113 * pin_user_pages*() APIs.) Cases:
114 *
115 * FOLL_GET: folio's refcount will be incremented by @refs.
116 *
117 * FOLL_PIN on large folios: folio's refcount will be incremented by
118 * @refs, and its pincount will be incremented by @refs.
119 *
120 * FOLL_PIN on single-page folios: folio's refcount will be incremented by
121 * @refs * GUP_PIN_COUNTING_BIAS.
122 *
123 * Return: The folio containing @page (with refcount appropriately
124 * incremented) for success, or NULL upon failure. If neither FOLL_GET
125 * nor FOLL_PIN was set, that's considered failure, and furthermore,
126 * a likely bug in the caller, so a warning is also emitted.
127 *
128 * It uses add ref unless zero to elevate the folio refcount and must be called
129 * in fast path only.
130 */
> 131 static struct folio *try_grab_folio_fast(struct page *page, int refs,
132 unsigned int flags)
133 {
134 struct folio *folio;
135
136 /* Raise warn if it is not called in fast GUP */
137 VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());
138
139 if (WARN_ON_ONCE((flags & (FOLL_GET | FOLL_PIN)) == 0))
140 return NULL;
141
142 if (unlikely(!(flags & FOLL_PCI_P2PDMA) && is_pci_p2pdma_page(page)))
143 return NULL;
144
145 if (flags & FOLL_GET)
146 return try_get_folio(page, refs);
147
148 /* FOLL_PIN is set */
149
150 /*
151 * Don't take a pin on the zero page - it's not going anywhere
152 * and it is used in a *lot* of places.
153 */
154 if (is_zero_page(page))
155 return page_folio(page);
156
157 folio = try_get_folio(page, refs);
158 if (!folio)
159 return NULL;
160
161 /*
162 * Can't do FOLL_LONGTERM + FOLL_PIN gup fast path if not in a
163 * right zone, so fail and let the caller fall back to the slow
164 * path.
165 */
166 if (unlikely((flags & FOLL_LONGTERM) &&
167 !folio_is_longterm_pinnable(folio))) {
168 if (!put_devmap_managed_folio_refs(folio, refs))
169 folio_put_refs(folio, refs);
170 return NULL;
171 }
172
173 /*
174 * When pinning a large folio, use an exact count to track it.
175 *
176 * However, be sure to *also* increment the normal folio
177 * refcount field at least once, so that the folio really
178 * is pinned. That's why the refcount from the earlier
179 * try_get_folio() is left intact.
180 */
181 if (folio_test_large(folio))
182 atomic_add(refs, &folio->_pincount);
183 else
184 folio_ref_add(folio,
185 refs * (GUP_PIN_COUNTING_BIAS - 1));
186 /*
187 * Adjust the pincount before re-checking the PTE for changes.
188 * This is essentially a smp_mb() and is paired with a memory
189 * barrier in folio_try_share_anon_rmap_*().
190 */
191 smp_mb__after_atomic();
192
193 node_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_FOLL_PIN_ACQUIRED, refs);
194
195 return folio;
196 }
197
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-05 2:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-04 23:48 [PATCH 1/2] mm: page_ref: remove folio_try_get_rcu() Yang Shi
2024-06-04 23:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: gup: do not call try_grab_folio() in slow path Yang Shi
2024-06-04 23:50 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-05 2:57 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-06-05 16:19 ` Yang Shi
2024-06-05 15:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: page_ref: remove folio_try_get_rcu() Peter Xu
2024-06-05 16:16 ` Yang Shi
2024-06-05 16:17 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202406051039.9m00gwIx-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vivek.kasireddy@intel.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.