All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	peterx@redhat.com, oliver.sang@intel.com, paulmck@kernel.org,
	david@redhat.com, willy@infradead.org, riel@surriel.com,
	vivek.kasireddy@intel.com, cl@linux.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, yang@os.amperecomputing.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: gup: do not call try_grab_folio() in slow path
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 10:57:13 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202406051039.9m00gwIx-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240604234858.948986-2-yang@os.amperecomputing.com>

Hi Yang,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Yang-Shi/mm-gup-do-not-call-try_grab_folio-in-slow-path/20240605-075027
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240604234858.948986-2-yang%40os.amperecomputing.com
patch subject: [PATCH 2/2] mm: gup: do not call try_grab_folio() in slow path
config: openrisc-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240605/202406051039.9m00gwIx-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240605/202406051039.9m00gwIx-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202406051039.9m00gwIx-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> mm/gup.c:131:22: warning: 'try_grab_folio_fast' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
     131 | static struct folio *try_grab_folio_fast(struct page *page, int refs,
         |                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


vim +/try_grab_folio_fast +131 mm/gup.c

   101	
   102	/**
   103	 * try_grab_folio_fast() - Attempt to get or pin a folio in fast path.
   104	 * @page:  pointer to page to be grabbed
   105	 * @refs:  the value to (effectively) add to the folio's refcount
   106	 * @flags: gup flags: these are the FOLL_* flag values.
   107	 *
   108	 * "grab" names in this file mean, "look at flags to decide whether to use
   109	 * FOLL_PIN or FOLL_GET behavior, when incrementing the folio's refcount.
   110	 *
   111	 * Either FOLL_PIN or FOLL_GET (or neither) must be set, but not both at the
   112	 * same time. (That's true throughout the get_user_pages*() and
   113	 * pin_user_pages*() APIs.) Cases:
   114	 *
   115	 *    FOLL_GET: folio's refcount will be incremented by @refs.
   116	 *
   117	 *    FOLL_PIN on large folios: folio's refcount will be incremented by
   118	 *    @refs, and its pincount will be incremented by @refs.
   119	 *
   120	 *    FOLL_PIN on single-page folios: folio's refcount will be incremented by
   121	 *    @refs * GUP_PIN_COUNTING_BIAS.
   122	 *
   123	 * Return: The folio containing @page (with refcount appropriately
   124	 * incremented) for success, or NULL upon failure. If neither FOLL_GET
   125	 * nor FOLL_PIN was set, that's considered failure, and furthermore,
   126	 * a likely bug in the caller, so a warning is also emitted.
   127	 *
   128	 * It uses add ref unless zero to elevate the folio refcount and must be called
   129	 * in fast path only.
   130	 */
 > 131	static struct folio *try_grab_folio_fast(struct page *page, int refs,
   132						 unsigned int flags)
   133	{
   134		struct folio *folio;
   135	
   136		/* Raise warn if it is not called in fast GUP */
   137		VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());
   138	
   139		if (WARN_ON_ONCE((flags & (FOLL_GET | FOLL_PIN)) == 0))
   140			return NULL;
   141	
   142		if (unlikely(!(flags & FOLL_PCI_P2PDMA) && is_pci_p2pdma_page(page)))
   143			return NULL;
   144	
   145		if (flags & FOLL_GET)
   146			return try_get_folio(page, refs);
   147	
   148		/* FOLL_PIN is set */
   149	
   150		/*
   151		 * Don't take a pin on the zero page - it's not going anywhere
   152		 * and it is used in a *lot* of places.
   153		 */
   154		if (is_zero_page(page))
   155			return page_folio(page);
   156	
   157		folio = try_get_folio(page, refs);
   158		if (!folio)
   159			return NULL;
   160	
   161		/*
   162		 * Can't do FOLL_LONGTERM + FOLL_PIN gup fast path if not in a
   163		 * right zone, so fail and let the caller fall back to the slow
   164		 * path.
   165		 */
   166		if (unlikely((flags & FOLL_LONGTERM) &&
   167			     !folio_is_longterm_pinnable(folio))) {
   168			if (!put_devmap_managed_folio_refs(folio, refs))
   169				folio_put_refs(folio, refs);
   170			return NULL;
   171		}
   172	
   173		/*
   174		 * When pinning a large folio, use an exact count to track it.
   175		 *
   176		 * However, be sure to *also* increment the normal folio
   177		 * refcount field at least once, so that the folio really
   178		 * is pinned.  That's why the refcount from the earlier
   179		 * try_get_folio() is left intact.
   180		 */
   181		if (folio_test_large(folio))
   182			atomic_add(refs, &folio->_pincount);
   183		else
   184			folio_ref_add(folio,
   185					refs * (GUP_PIN_COUNTING_BIAS - 1));
   186		/*
   187		 * Adjust the pincount before re-checking the PTE for changes.
   188		 * This is essentially a smp_mb() and is paired with a memory
   189		 * barrier in folio_try_share_anon_rmap_*().
   190		 */
   191		smp_mb__after_atomic();
   192	
   193		node_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_FOLL_PIN_ACQUIRED, refs);
   194	
   195		return folio;
   196	}
   197	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-06-05  2:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-04 23:48 [PATCH 1/2] mm: page_ref: remove folio_try_get_rcu() Yang Shi
2024-06-04 23:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: gup: do not call try_grab_folio() in slow path Yang Shi
2024-06-04 23:50   ` kernel test robot
2024-06-05  2:57   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-06-05 16:19     ` Yang Shi
2024-06-05 15:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: page_ref: remove folio_try_get_rcu() Peter Xu
2024-06-05 16:16   ` Yang Shi
2024-06-05 16:17     ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202406051039.9m00gwIx-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vivek.kasireddy@intel.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.