From: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
peterx@redhat.com, oliver.sang@intel.com, paulmck@kernel.org,
david@redhat.com, willy@infradead.org, riel@surriel.com,
vivek.kasireddy@intel.com, cl@linux.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: gup: do not call try_grab_folio() in slow path
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 09:19:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd7f2213-df8b-4105-a20a-bbf1f9e0a0ac@os.amperecomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202406051039.9m00gwIx-lkp@intel.com>
On 6/4/24 7:57 PM, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Yang,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Yang-Shi/mm-gup-do-not-call-try_grab_folio-in-slow-path/20240605-075027
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240604234858.948986-2-yang%40os.amperecomputing.com
> patch subject: [PATCH 2/2] mm: gup: do not call try_grab_folio() in slow path
> config: openrisc-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240605/202406051039.9m00gwIx-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: or1k-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240605/202406051039.9m00gwIx-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202406051039.9m00gwIx-lkp@intel.com/
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
>>> mm/gup.c:131:22: warning: 'try_grab_folio_fast' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
Thanks for reporting the problem. It seems try_grab_folio_fast()
definition should be protected by CONFIG_HAVE_FAST_GUP, will fix it in v2.
> 131 | static struct folio *try_grab_folio_fast(struct page *page, int refs,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
> vim +/try_grab_folio_fast +131 mm/gup.c
>
> 101
> 102 /**
> 103 * try_grab_folio_fast() - Attempt to get or pin a folio in fast path.
> 104 * @page: pointer to page to be grabbed
> 105 * @refs: the value to (effectively) add to the folio's refcount
> 106 * @flags: gup flags: these are the FOLL_* flag values.
> 107 *
> 108 * "grab" names in this file mean, "look at flags to decide whether to use
> 109 * FOLL_PIN or FOLL_GET behavior, when incrementing the folio's refcount.
> 110 *
> 111 * Either FOLL_PIN or FOLL_GET (or neither) must be set, but not both at the
> 112 * same time. (That's true throughout the get_user_pages*() and
> 113 * pin_user_pages*() APIs.) Cases:
> 114 *
> 115 * FOLL_GET: folio's refcount will be incremented by @refs.
> 116 *
> 117 * FOLL_PIN on large folios: folio's refcount will be incremented by
> 118 * @refs, and its pincount will be incremented by @refs.
> 119 *
> 120 * FOLL_PIN on single-page folios: folio's refcount will be incremented by
> 121 * @refs * GUP_PIN_COUNTING_BIAS.
> 122 *
> 123 * Return: The folio containing @page (with refcount appropriately
> 124 * incremented) for success, or NULL upon failure. If neither FOLL_GET
> 125 * nor FOLL_PIN was set, that's considered failure, and furthermore,
> 126 * a likely bug in the caller, so a warning is also emitted.
> 127 *
> 128 * It uses add ref unless zero to elevate the folio refcount and must be called
> 129 * in fast path only.
> 130 */
> > 131 static struct folio *try_grab_folio_fast(struct page *page, int refs,
> 132 unsigned int flags)
> 133 {
> 134 struct folio *folio;
> 135
> 136 /* Raise warn if it is not called in fast GUP */
> 137 VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());
> 138
> 139 if (WARN_ON_ONCE((flags & (FOLL_GET | FOLL_PIN)) == 0))
> 140 return NULL;
> 141
> 142 if (unlikely(!(flags & FOLL_PCI_P2PDMA) && is_pci_p2pdma_page(page)))
> 143 return NULL;
> 144
> 145 if (flags & FOLL_GET)
> 146 return try_get_folio(page, refs);
> 147
> 148 /* FOLL_PIN is set */
> 149
> 150 /*
> 151 * Don't take a pin on the zero page - it's not going anywhere
> 152 * and it is used in a *lot* of places.
> 153 */
> 154 if (is_zero_page(page))
> 155 return page_folio(page);
> 156
> 157 folio = try_get_folio(page, refs);
> 158 if (!folio)
> 159 return NULL;
> 160
> 161 /*
> 162 * Can't do FOLL_LONGTERM + FOLL_PIN gup fast path if not in a
> 163 * right zone, so fail and let the caller fall back to the slow
> 164 * path.
> 165 */
> 166 if (unlikely((flags & FOLL_LONGTERM) &&
> 167 !folio_is_longterm_pinnable(folio))) {
> 168 if (!put_devmap_managed_folio_refs(folio, refs))
> 169 folio_put_refs(folio, refs);
> 170 return NULL;
> 171 }
> 172
> 173 /*
> 174 * When pinning a large folio, use an exact count to track it.
> 175 *
> 176 * However, be sure to *also* increment the normal folio
> 177 * refcount field at least once, so that the folio really
> 178 * is pinned. That's why the refcount from the earlier
> 179 * try_get_folio() is left intact.
> 180 */
> 181 if (folio_test_large(folio))
> 182 atomic_add(refs, &folio->_pincount);
> 183 else
> 184 folio_ref_add(folio,
> 185 refs * (GUP_PIN_COUNTING_BIAS - 1));
> 186 /*
> 187 * Adjust the pincount before re-checking the PTE for changes.
> 188 * This is essentially a smp_mb() and is paired with a memory
> 189 * barrier in folio_try_share_anon_rmap_*().
> 190 */
> 191 smp_mb__after_atomic();
> 192
> 193 node_stat_mod_folio(folio, NR_FOLL_PIN_ACQUIRED, refs);
> 194
> 195 return folio;
> 196 }
> 197
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-05 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-04 23:48 [PATCH 1/2] mm: page_ref: remove folio_try_get_rcu() Yang Shi
2024-06-04 23:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: gup: do not call try_grab_folio() in slow path Yang Shi
2024-06-04 23:50 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-05 2:57 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-05 16:19 ` Yang Shi [this message]
2024-06-05 15:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: page_ref: remove folio_try_get_rcu() Peter Xu
2024-06-05 16:16 ` Yang Shi
2024-06-05 16:17 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dd7f2213-df8b-4105-a20a-bbf1f9e0a0ac@os.amperecomputing.com \
--to=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vivek.kasireddy@intel.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.