All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	patches@lists.linux.dev, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
	David Gow <davidgow@google.com>, Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
	Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>,
	Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/11] of: Add a KUnit test for overlays and test managed APIs
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 17:47:20 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240605234720.GA3441001-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240603223811.3815762-6-sboyd@kernel.org>

On Mon, Jun 03, 2024 at 03:38:02PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Test the KUnit test managed overlay APIs. Confirm that platform devices
> are created and destroyed properly. This provides us confidence that the
> test managed APIs work correctly and can be relied upon to provide tests
> with fake platform devices and device nodes via overlays compiled into
> the kernel image.
> 
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
> Cc: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
> Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>
> Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
> Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/of/.kunitconfig            |   1 +
>  drivers/of/Kconfig                 |  10 +++
>  drivers/of/Makefile                |   1 +
>  drivers/of/kunit_overlay_test.dtso |   9 +++
>  drivers/of/overlay_test.c          | 116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 137 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/of/kunit_overlay_test.dtso
>  create mode 100644 drivers/of/overlay_test.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/.kunitconfig b/drivers/of/.kunitconfig
> index 5a8fee11978c..4c53d2c7a275 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/.kunitconfig
> +++ b/drivers/of/.kunitconfig
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
>  CONFIG_KUNIT=y
>  CONFIG_OF=y
>  CONFIG_OF_KUNIT_TEST=y
> +CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY_KUNIT_TEST=y
> diff --git a/drivers/of/Kconfig b/drivers/of/Kconfig
> index dd726c7056bf..0e2d608c3e20 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/of/Kconfig
> @@ -107,6 +107,16 @@ config OF_OVERLAY
>  	  While this option is selected automatically when needed, you can
>  	  enable it manually to improve device tree unit test coverage.
>  
> +config OF_OVERLAY_KUNIT_TEST
> +	tristate "Device Tree overlay KUnit tests" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> +	depends on KUNIT
> +	default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> +	select OF_OVERLAY
> +	help
> +	  This option builds KUnit unit tests for the device tree overlay code.
> +
> +	  If unsure, say N here, but this option is safe to enable.
> +
>  config OF_NUMA
>  	bool
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/of/Makefile b/drivers/of/Makefile
> index 2ae909adde49..abd9c578343b 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/of/Makefile
> @@ -21,5 +21,6 @@ endif
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_KUNIT) += of_kunit_helpers.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_OF_KUNIT_TEST) += of_test.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY_KUNIT_TEST) += overlay_test.o kunit_overlay_test.dtbo.o
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_OF_UNITTEST) += unittest-data/
> diff --git a/drivers/of/kunit_overlay_test.dtso b/drivers/of/kunit_overlay_test.dtso
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..85f20b4b4c16
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/of/kunit_overlay_test.dtso
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/dts-v1/;
> +/plugin/;
> +
> +&{/} {
> +	kunit-test {
> +		compatible = "test,empty";
> +	};
> +};
> diff --git a/drivers/of/overlay_test.c b/drivers/of/overlay_test.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..9a8083c3a659
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/of/overlay_test.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * KUnit tests for device tree overlays
> + */
> +#include <linux/device/bus.h>
> +#include <linux/kconfig.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +
> +#include <kunit/of.h>
> +#include <kunit/test.h>
> +
> +static const char * const kunit_node_name = "kunit-test";
> +static const char * const kunit_compatible = "test,empty";
> +
> +/* Test that of_overlay_apply_kunit() adds a node to the live tree */
> +static void of_overlay_apply_kunit_apply(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0,
> +			of_overlay_apply_kunit(test, kunit_overlay_test));
> +
> +	np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, kunit_node_name);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> +	of_node_put(np);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Test that of_overlay_apply_kunit() creates platform devices with the
> + * expected device_node
> + */
> +static void of_overlay_apply_kunit_platform_device(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct platform_device *pdev;
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0,
> +			of_overlay_apply_kunit(test, kunit_overlay_test));
> +
> +	np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, kunit_node_name);
> +	of_node_put_kunit(test, np);

Moving target, but we now have of_node_put() cleanups. Would that work 
here instead?

> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> +
> +	pdev = of_find_device_by_node(np);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, pdev);
> +	if (pdev)
> +		put_device(&pdev->dev);
> +}
> +
> +static int of_overlay_bus_match_compatible(struct device *dev, const void *data)
> +{
> +	return of_device_is_compatible(dev->of_node, data);
> +}
> +
> +/* Test that of_overlay_apply_kunit() cleans up after the test is finished */
> +static void of_overlay_apply_kunit_cleanup(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct kunit fake;
> +	struct platform_device *pdev;
> +	struct device *dev;
> +	struct device_node *np;
> +
> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY))
> +		kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY");
> +	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_EARLY_FLATTREE))
> +		kunit_skip(test, "requires CONFIG_OF_EARLY_FLATTREE for root node");
> +
> +	kunit_init_test(&fake, "fake test", NULL);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, fake.status, KUNIT_SUCCESS);
> +
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 0,
> +			of_overlay_apply_kunit(&fake, kunit_overlay_test));
> +
> +	np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, kunit_node_name);
> +	of_node_put(np); /* Not derefing 'np' after this */
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, np);
> +
> +	pdev = of_find_device_by_node(np);

Don't you need to hold a ref on np until here?


> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, pdev);
> +	put_device(&pdev->dev); /* Not derefing 'pdev' after this */
> +
> +	/* Remove overlay */
> +	kunit_cleanup(&fake);
> +
> +	/* The node and device should be removed */
> +	np = of_find_node_by_name(NULL, kunit_node_name);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, NULL, np);
> +	of_node_put(np);
> +
> +	dev = bus_find_device(&platform_bus_type, NULL, kunit_compatible,
> +			      of_overlay_bus_match_compatible);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, NULL, dev);
> +	put_device(dev);
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_case of_overlay_apply_kunit_test_cases[] = {
> +	KUNIT_CASE(of_overlay_apply_kunit_apply),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(of_overlay_apply_kunit_platform_device),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(of_overlay_apply_kunit_cleanup),
> +	{}
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Test suite for test managed device tree overlays.
> + */
> +static struct kunit_suite of_overlay_apply_kunit_suite = {
> +	.name = "of_overlay_apply_kunit",
> +	.test_cases = of_overlay_apply_kunit_test_cases,
> +};
> +
> +kunit_test_suites(
> +	&of_overlay_apply_kunit_suite,
> +);
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> -- 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git/
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sboyd/spmi.git
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-05 23:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-03 22:37 [PATCH v5 00/11] clk: Add kunit tests for fixed rate and parent data Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:37 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] of/platform: Allow overlays to create platform devices from the root node Stephen Boyd
2024-06-05 23:47   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-06-03 22:37 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] of: Add test managed wrappers for of_overlay_apply()/of_node_put() Stephen Boyd
2024-06-13  7:48   ` David Gow
2024-07-02 22:39     ` Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add "test" vendor for KUnit and friends Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] dt-bindings: test: Add KUnit empty node binding Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] of: Add a KUnit test for overlays and test managed APIs Stephen Boyd
2024-06-05 23:47   ` Rob Herring [this message]
2024-06-06 15:23     ` Stephen Boyd
2024-06-13  7:50   ` David Gow
2024-07-02 21:45     ` Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] platform: Add test managed platform_device/driver APIs Stephen Boyd
2024-06-04 13:48   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-06-13  7:50   ` David Gow
2024-06-13  7:50     ` David Gow
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] dt-bindings: test: Add single clk consumer Stephen Boyd
2024-06-04 12:50   ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-06-04 13:05   ` Rob Herring
2024-06-04 18:28     ` Stephen Boyd
2024-06-04 20:19       ` Rob Herring
2024-06-04 20:52         ` Stephen Boyd
2024-06-04 20:53         ` Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] clk: Add test managed clk provider/consumer APIs Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] clk: Add KUnit tests for clk fixed rate basic type Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] dt-bindings: clk: Add clk_parent_data test Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] clk: Add KUnit tests for clks registered with struct clk_parent_data Stephen Boyd
2024-06-13  7:56   ` David Gow
2024-07-02 22:25     ` Stephen Boyd
2024-07-02 22:34       ` Stephen Boyd

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240605234720.GA3441001-robh@kernel.org \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
    --cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dlatypov@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rmoar@google.com \
    --cc=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.