From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
patches@lists.linux.dev, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@linux.dev>,
Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Rafael J . Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>,
Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/11] of: Add test managed wrappers for of_overlay_apply()/of_node_put()
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2024 15:39:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2863a45a9fa0479707672c52164ceb0d.sboyd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABVgOS=duqR0Lea0i92pWR-618iRGkvvATk30MJrU7RRDR8LPg@mail.gmail.com>
Quoting David Gow (2024-06-13 00:48:54)
>
> This looks good to me.
>
> I was a little confused at first by some of the wrapper names: in
> particular that of_overlay_fdt_apply_kunit() is applying the overlay
> immediately, and deferring a cleanup action, but of_node_put_kunit()
> is not doing anything immediately, and deferring the put action. My
> feeling is that the ideal thing would be to have wrappers for all of
> the of_* functions which return a node which needs to be 'put', and
> have those wrappers add an of_node_put() action. You could then have
> of_node_put_kunit() provide a way to trigger that action early. But
> that seems like it'd be a lot of work and generate a lot of wrappers
> we otherwise wouldn't need, so this seems an okay compromise to be
> able to keep using the existing of_ functions. The documentation /
> comments help make this more clear, too.
>
> So, no actual problems. (Assuming you don't want to put the
> documentation under the devicetree rather than under KUnit -- it can
> go either way.)
>
> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
>
Thanks. I'll just leave this alone as I feel like the kunit postfix
means "do stuff when test is done".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-02 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-03 22:37 [PATCH v5 00/11] clk: Add kunit tests for fixed rate and parent data Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:37 ` [PATCH v5 01/11] of/platform: Allow overlays to create platform devices from the root node Stephen Boyd
2024-06-05 23:47 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-06-03 22:37 ` [PATCH v5 02/11] of: Add test managed wrappers for of_overlay_apply()/of_node_put() Stephen Boyd
2024-06-13 7:48 ` David Gow
2024-07-02 22:39 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 03/11] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add "test" vendor for KUnit and friends Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 04/11] dt-bindings: test: Add KUnit empty node binding Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 05/11] of: Add a KUnit test for overlays and test managed APIs Stephen Boyd
2024-06-05 23:47 ` Rob Herring
2024-06-06 15:23 ` Stephen Boyd
2024-06-13 7:50 ` David Gow
2024-07-02 21:45 ` Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 06/11] platform: Add test managed platform_device/driver APIs Stephen Boyd
2024-06-04 13:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-06-13 7:50 ` David Gow
2024-06-13 7:50 ` David Gow
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 07/11] dt-bindings: test: Add single clk consumer Stephen Boyd
2024-06-04 12:50 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
2024-06-04 13:05 ` Rob Herring
2024-06-04 18:28 ` Stephen Boyd
2024-06-04 20:19 ` Rob Herring
2024-06-04 20:52 ` Stephen Boyd
2024-06-04 20:53 ` Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 08/11] clk: Add test managed clk provider/consumer APIs Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 09/11] clk: Add KUnit tests for clk fixed rate basic type Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 10/11] dt-bindings: clk: Add clk_parent_data test Stephen Boyd
2024-06-03 22:38 ` [PATCH v5 11/11] clk: Add KUnit tests for clks registered with struct clk_parent_data Stephen Boyd
2024-06-13 7:56 ` David Gow
2024-07-02 22:25 ` Stephen Boyd
2024-07-02 22:34 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2863a45a9fa0479707672c52164ceb0d.sboyd@kernel.org \
--to=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
--cc=brendan.higgins@linux.dev \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlatypov@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rmoar@google.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.