Re: [PATCH v10 00/38] ep93xx device tree conversion

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@maquefel.me>
Cc: "Nikita Shubin via B4 Relay"
	<devnull+nikita.shubin.maquefel.me@kernel.org>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Hartley Sweeten" <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>,
	"Alexander Sverdlin" <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com>,
	"Russell King" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"Lukasz Majewski" <lukma@denx.de>,
	"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	"Bartosz Golaszewski" <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
	"Michael Turquette" <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	"Stephen Boyd" <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	"Sebastian Reichel" <sre@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Vinod Koul" <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	"Wim Van Sebroeck" <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
	"Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
	"Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	"Damien Le Moal" <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
	"Sergey Shtylyov" <s.shtylyov@omp.ru>,
	"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	"Liam Girdwood" <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	"Jaroslav Kysela" <perex@perex.cz>,
	"Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@suse.com>,
	"Ralf Baechle" <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
	"Wu, Aaron" <Aaron.Wu@analog.com>, "Lee Jones" <lee@kernel.org>,
	"Olof Johansson" <olof@lixom.net>,
	"Niklas Cassel" <cassel@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org,
	"Bartosz Golaszewski" <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/38] ep93xx device tree conversion
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 11:08:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240618110808.7829d214@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eb3e6c0b883f408fed68e725a23b54854701ce9e.camel@maquefel.me>

On Tue, 18 Jun 2024 19:33:49 +0300 Nikita Shubin wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-06-18 at 07:33 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:36:34 +0300 Nikita Shubin via B4 Relay wrote:  
> > > The goal is to recieve ACKs for all patches in series to merge it
> > > via Arnd branch.  
> > 
> > Why? The usual process is for every subsystem to accept the relevant
> > patches, and then they converge during the merge window.  
> 
> It was decided from the very beginning of these series, mostly because
> it's a full conversion of platform code to DT and it seemed not
> convenient to maintain compatibility with both platform and DT.
> 
> Generally i think it's too late to ask such a question, when just a few
> patches left.

Put the relevant information in the cover letter. Justification why you
can't follow normal merging rules is very relevant.