[PATCH 4/5] ata: libata-scsi: Assign local_port_no at host allocation time

[Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>]

Now when we have removed support for decreasing the number of ports,
the most logical thing is to assign local_port_no at the same location(s)
where we assign port_no.

Note that we cannot move the local_port_no assignment to ata_port_alloc(),
because not all users of ata_port_alloc() assigns local_port_no
(i.e. ata_sas_port_alloc()).

I have no idea what local_port_no is actually used for, but at least
there should be no functional changes caused by this commit.

Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
index fb4835c2ba2d..ee1a75bc0466 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
@@ -5591,6 +5591,7 @@ struct ata_host *ata_host_alloc(struct device *dev, int n_ports)
 			goto err_out;
 
 		ap->port_no = i;
+		ap->local_port_no = i + 1;
 		host->ports[i] = ap;
 	}
 
@@ -5902,10 +5903,6 @@ int ata_host_register(struct ata_host *host, const struct scsi_host_template *sh
 	for (i = host->n_ports; host->ports[i]; i++)
 		WARN_ON(host->ports[i]);
 
-	/* give ports names and add SCSI hosts */
-	for (i = 0; i < host->n_ports; i++)
-		host->ports[i]->local_port_no = i + 1;
-
 	/* Create associated sysfs transport objects  */
 	for (i = 0; i < host->n_ports; i++) {
 		rc = ata_tport_add(host->dev,host->ports[i]);
-- 
2.45.2