From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: chao@kernel.org,dhowells@redhat.com,gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,huyue2@coolpad.com,jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com,linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org,marc.dionne@auristor.com,netfs@lists.linux.dev,xiang@kernel.org
Cc: stable-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Patch "cachefiles, erofs: Fix NULL deref in when cachefiles is not doing ondemand-mode" has been added to the 6.6-stable tree
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 13:27:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024061901-dangle-idealism-cf51@gregkh> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
cachefiles, erofs: Fix NULL deref in when cachefiles is not doing ondemand-mode
to the 6.6-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
cachefiles-erofs-fix-null-deref-in-when-cachefiles-is-not-doing-ondemand-mode.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.6 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
From c3d6569a43322f371e7ba0ad386112723757ac8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 20:49:34 +0000
Subject: cachefiles, erofs: Fix NULL deref in when cachefiles is not doing ondemand-mode
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
commit c3d6569a43322f371e7ba0ad386112723757ac8f upstream.
cachefiles_ondemand_init_object() as called from cachefiles_open_file() and
cachefiles_create_tmpfile() does not check if object->ondemand is set
before dereferencing it, leading to an oops something like:
RIP: 0010:cachefiles_ondemand_init_object+0x9/0x41
...
Call Trace:
<TASK>
cachefiles_open_file+0xc9/0x187
cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x122/0x2be
fscache_cookie_state_machine+0xbe/0x32b
fscache_cookie_worker+0x1f/0x2d
process_one_work+0x136/0x208
process_scheduled_works+0x3a/0x41
worker_thread+0x1a2/0x1f6
kthread+0xca/0xd2
ret_from_fork+0x21/0x33
Fix this by making cachefiles_ondemand_init_object() return immediately if
cachefiles->ondemand is NULL.
Fixes: 3c5ecfe16e76 ("cachefiles: extract ondemand info field from cachefiles_object")
Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>
cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
cc: Yue Hu <huyue2@coolpad.com>
cc: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
cc: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
+++ b/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
@@ -611,6 +611,9 @@ int cachefiles_ondemand_init_object(stru
struct fscache_volume *volume = object->volume->vcookie;
size_t volume_key_size, cookie_key_size, data_len;
+ if (!object->ondemand)
+ return 0;
+
/*
* CacheFiles will firstly check the cache file under the root cache
* directory. If the coherency check failed, it will fallback to
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from dhowells@redhat.com are
queue-6.6/cachefiles-resend-an-open-request-if-the-read-reques.patch
queue-6.6/cachefiles-add-restore-command-to-recover-inflight-o.patch
queue-6.6/cachefiles-introduce-object-ondemand-state.patch
queue-6.6/cachefiles-extract-ondemand-info-field-from-cachefil.patch
queue-6.6/cachefiles-erofs-fix-null-deref-in-when-cachefiles-is-not-doing-ondemand-mode.patch
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: chao@kernel.org,dhowells@redhat.com,gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,huyue2@coolpad.com,jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com,linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org,marc.dionne@auristor.com,netfs@lists.linux.dev,xiang@kernel.org
Cc: <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "cachefiles, erofs: Fix NULL deref in when cachefiles is not doing ondemand-mode" has been added to the 6.6-stable tree
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 13:27:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2024061901-dangle-idealism-cf51@gregkh> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
cachefiles, erofs: Fix NULL deref in when cachefiles is not doing ondemand-mode
to the 6.6-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
cachefiles-erofs-fix-null-deref-in-when-cachefiles-is-not-doing-ondemand-mode.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.6 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
From c3d6569a43322f371e7ba0ad386112723757ac8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 20:49:34 +0000
Subject: cachefiles, erofs: Fix NULL deref in when cachefiles is not doing ondemand-mode
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
commit c3d6569a43322f371e7ba0ad386112723757ac8f upstream.
cachefiles_ondemand_init_object() as called from cachefiles_open_file() and
cachefiles_create_tmpfile() does not check if object->ondemand is set
before dereferencing it, leading to an oops something like:
RIP: 0010:cachefiles_ondemand_init_object+0x9/0x41
...
Call Trace:
<TASK>
cachefiles_open_file+0xc9/0x187
cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x122/0x2be
fscache_cookie_state_machine+0xbe/0x32b
fscache_cookie_worker+0x1f/0x2d
process_one_work+0x136/0x208
process_scheduled_works+0x3a/0x41
worker_thread+0x1a2/0x1f6
kthread+0xca/0xd2
ret_from_fork+0x21/0x33
Fix this by making cachefiles_ondemand_init_object() return immediately if
cachefiles->ondemand is NULL.
Fixes: 3c5ecfe16e76 ("cachefiles: extract ondemand info field from cachefiles_object")
Reported-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>
cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
cc: Yue Hu <huyue2@coolpad.com>
cc: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
cc: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
+++ b/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
@@ -611,6 +611,9 @@ int cachefiles_ondemand_init_object(stru
struct fscache_volume *volume = object->volume->vcookie;
size_t volume_key_size, cookie_key_size, data_len;
+ if (!object->ondemand)
+ return 0;
+
/*
* CacheFiles will firstly check the cache file under the root cache
* directory. If the coherency check failed, it will fallback to
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from dhowells@redhat.com are
queue-6.6/cachefiles-resend-an-open-request-if-the-read-reques.patch
queue-6.6/cachefiles-add-restore-command-to-recover-inflight-o.patch
queue-6.6/cachefiles-introduce-object-ondemand-state.patch
queue-6.6/cachefiles-extract-ondemand-info-field-from-cachefil.patch
queue-6.6/cachefiles-erofs-fix-null-deref-in-when-cachefiles-is-not-doing-ondemand-mode.patch
next reply other threads:[~2024-06-19 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-19 11:27 gregkh [this message]
2024-06-19 11:27 ` Patch "cachefiles, erofs: Fix NULL deref in when cachefiles is not doing ondemand-mode" has been added to the 6.6-stable tree gregkh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2024061901-dangle-idealism-cf51@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=huyue2@coolpad.com \
--cc=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=marc.dionne@auristor.com \
--cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.