From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: shuah@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mark.rutland@arm.com,
ryan.roberts@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
Anshuman.Khandual@arm.com, DeepakKumar.Mishra@arm.com,
aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] selftests: Add a test mangling with uc_sigmask
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 11:18:47 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240626054847.1463889-3-dev.jain@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240626054847.1463889-1-dev.jain@arm.com>
This test asserts the relation between blocked signal, delivered signal,
and ucontext. The ucontext is mangled with, by adding a signal mask to
it; on return from the handler, the thread must block the corresponding
signal.
In the test description, I have also described signal delivery and blockage,
for ease of understanding what the test does.
Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/signal/.gitignore | 1 +
tools/testing/selftests/signal/Makefile | 3 +-
.../selftests/signal/mangle_uc_sigmask.c | 194 ++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/signal/mangle_uc_sigmask.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/signal/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/signal/.gitignore
index 98a7bbc4f325..397fef11c89f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/signal/.gitignore
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/signal/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+mangle_uc_sigmask
sigaltstack
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/signal/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/signal/Makefile
index dd6be992fd81..735387a53114 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/signal/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/signal/Makefile
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
CFLAGS = -Wall
-TEST_GEN_PROGS = sigaltstack
+TEST_GEN_PROGS = mangle_uc_sigmask
+TEST_GEN_PROGS += sigaltstack
include ../lib.mk
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/signal/mangle_uc_sigmask.c b/tools/testing/selftests/signal/mangle_uc_sigmask.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..772109e97aaf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/signal/mangle_uc_sigmask.c
@@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2024 ARM Ltd.
+ *
+ * Author: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
+ *
+ * Test describing a clear distinction between signal states - delivered and
+ * blocked, and their relation with ucontext.
+ *
+ * A process can request blocking of a signal by masking it into its set of
+ * blocked signals; such a signal, when sent to the process by the kernel,
+ * will get blocked by the process and it may later unblock it and take an
+ * action. At that point, the signal will be delivered.
+ *
+ * We test the following functionalities of the kernel:
+ *
+ * ucontext_t describes the interrupted context of the thread; this implies
+ * that, in case of registering a handler and catching the corresponding
+ * signal, that state is before what was jumping into the handler.
+ *
+ * The thread's mask of blocked signals can be permanently changed, i.e, not
+ * just during the execution of the handler, by mangling with uc_sigmask
+ * from inside the handler.
+ *
+ * Assume that we block the set of signals, S1, by sigaction(), and say, the
+ * signal for which the handler was installed, is S2. When S2 is sent to the
+ * program, it will be considered "delivered", since we will act on the
+ * signal and jump to the handler. Any instances of S1 or S2 raised, while the
+ * program is executing inside the handler, will be blocked; they will be
+ * delivered immediately upon termination of the handler.
+ *
+ * For standard signals (also see real-time signals in the man page), multiple
+ * blocked instances of the same signal are not queued; such a signal will
+ * be delivered just once.
+ */
+
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <signal.h>
+#include <ucontext.h>
+
+#include "../kselftest.h"
+
+void handler_verify_ucontext(int signo, siginfo_t *info, void *uc)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Kernel dumps ucontext with USR2 blocked */
+ ret = sigismember(&(((ucontext_t *)uc)->uc_sigmask), SIGUSR2);
+ ksft_test_result(ret == 1, "USR2 blocked in ucontext\n");
+
+ /*
+ * USR2 is blocked; can be delivered neither here, nor after
+ * exit from handler
+ */
+ if (raise(SIGUSR2))
+ ksft_exit_fail_perror("raise");
+}
+
+void handler_segv(int signo, siginfo_t *info, void *uc)
+{
+ /*
+ * Three cases possible:
+ * 1. Program already terminated due to segmentation fault.
+ * 2. SEGV was blocked even after returning from handler_usr.
+ * 3. SEGV was delivered on returning from handler_usr.
+ * The last option must happen.
+ */
+ ksft_test_result_pass("SEGV delivered\n");
+}
+
+static int cnt;
+
+void handler_usr(int signo, siginfo_t *info, void *uc)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ /*
+ * Break out of infinite recursion caused by raise(SIGUSR1) invoked
+ * from inside the handler
+ */
+ ++cnt;
+ if (cnt > 1)
+ return;
+
+ ksft_print_msg("In handler_usr\n");
+
+ /* SEGV blocked during handler execution, delivered on return */
+ if (raise(SIGSEGV))
+ ksft_exit_fail_perror("raise");
+
+ ksft_print_msg("SEGV bypassed successfully\n");
+
+ /*
+ * Signal responsible for handler invocation is blocked by default;
+ * delivered on return, leading to recursion
+ */
+ if (raise(SIGUSR1))
+ ksft_exit_fail_perror("raise");
+
+ ksft_test_result(cnt == 1,
+ "USR1 is blocked, cannot invoke handler right now\n");
+
+ /* Raise USR1 again; only one instance must be delivered upon exit */
+ if (raise(SIGUSR1))
+ ksft_exit_fail_perror("raise");
+
+ /* SEGV has been blocked in sa_mask, but ucontext is empty */
+ ret = sigismember(&(((ucontext_t *)uc)->uc_sigmask), SIGSEGV);
+ ksft_test_result(ret == 0, "SEGV not blocked in ucontext\n");
+
+ /* USR1 has been blocked, but ucontext is empty */
+ ret = sigismember(&(((ucontext_t *)uc)->uc_sigmask), SIGUSR1);
+ ksft_test_result(ret == 0, "USR1 not blocked in ucontext\n");
+
+ /*
+ * Mangle ucontext; this will be copied back into ¤t->blocked
+ * on return from the handler.
+ */
+ if (sigaddset(&((ucontext_t *)uc)->uc_sigmask, SIGUSR2))
+ ksft_exit_fail_perror("sigaddset");
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+ struct sigaction act, act2;
+ sigset_t *set, *oldset;
+
+ ksft_print_header();
+ ksft_set_plan(7);
+
+ act.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO;
+ act.sa_sigaction = &handler_usr;
+
+ /* Add SEGV to blocked mask */
+ if (sigemptyset(&act.sa_mask) || sigaddset(&act.sa_mask, SIGSEGV)
+ || (sigismember(&act.sa_mask, SIGSEGV) != 1))
+ ksft_exit_fail_msg("Cannot add SEGV to blocked mask\n");
+
+ if (sigaction(SIGUSR1, &act, NULL))
+ ksft_exit_fail_perror("Cannot install handler");
+
+ act2.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO;
+ act2.sa_sigaction = &handler_segv;
+
+ if (sigaction(SIGSEGV, &act2, NULL))
+ ksft_exit_fail_perror("Cannot install handler");
+
+ /* Invoke handler */
+ if (raise(SIGUSR1))
+ ksft_exit_fail_perror("raise");
+
+ /* USR1 must not be queued */
+ ksft_test_result(cnt == 2, "handler invoked only twice\n");
+
+ /* Mangled ucontext implies USR2 is blocked for current thread */
+ if (raise(SIGUSR2))
+ ksft_exit_fail_perror("raise");
+
+ ksft_print_msg("USR2 bypassed successfully\n");
+
+ act.sa_sigaction = &handler_verify_ucontext;
+ if (sigaction(SIGUSR1, &act, NULL))
+ ksft_exit_fail_perror("Cannot install handler");
+
+ if (raise(SIGUSR1))
+ ksft_exit_fail_perror("raise");
+
+ /*
+ * Raising USR2 in handler_verify_ucontext is redundant since it
+ * is blocked
+ */
+ ksft_print_msg("USR2 still blocked on return from handler\n");
+
+ /* Confirm USR2 blockage by sigprocmask() too */
+ set = malloc(sizeof(sigset_t *));
+ if (!set)
+ ksft_exit_fail_perror("malloc");
+
+ oldset = malloc(sizeof(sigset_t *));
+ if (!oldset)
+ ksft_exit_fail_perror("malloc");
+
+ if (sigemptyset(set))
+ ksft_exit_fail_perror("sigemptyset");
+
+ if (sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, set, oldset))
+ ksft_exit_fail_perror("sigprocmask");
+
+ ksft_test_result(sigismember(oldset, SIGUSR2) == 1,
+ "USR2 present in ¤t->blocked\n");
+
+ ksft_finished();
+}
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-26 5:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-26 5:48 [PATCH v3 0/2] Add test to distinguish between thread's signal mask and ucontext_t Dev Jain
2024-06-26 5:48 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] selftests: Rename sigaltstack to generic signal Dev Jain
2024-06-26 5:48 ` Dev Jain [this message]
2024-06-26 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] selftests: Add a test mangling with uc_sigmask Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-26 13:36 ` Dev Jain
2024-06-26 16:07 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240626054847.1463889-3-dev.jain@arm.com \
--to=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=Anshuman.Khandual@arm.com \
--cc=DeepakKumar.Mishra@arm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.