From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: microchip: rework reg region handing to support using either instance 1 or 2
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 21:14:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240703-persuaded-replace-abd30141b2eb@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202407040339.i1nFFozS-lkp@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4693 bytes --]
On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 04:01:42AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Conor,
>
> kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
>
> [auto build test WARNING on pci/for-linus]
> [also build test WARNING on robh/for-next linus/master v6.10-rc6]
> [cannot apply to pci/next next-20240703]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Conor-Dooley/dt-bindings-PCI-microchip-pcie-host-fix-reg-properties/20240701-183154
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci.git for-linus
> patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240701-charger-recognize-fd8a65026a89%40spud
> patch subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: microchip: rework reg region handing to support using either instance 1 or 2
> config: x86_64-randconfig-102-20240703 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240704/202407040339.i1nFFozS-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: gcc-13 (Ubuntu 13.2.0-4ubuntu3) 13.2.0
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202407040339.i1nFFozS-lkp@intel.com/
>
> cocci warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> >> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-microchip-host.c:1142:5-11: inconsistent IS_ERR and PTR_ERR on line 1143.
This is a valid warning and was reported against my patch submission
rather than my kernel.org tree where I had put the patch overnight
before submitting - any reason why it only CCed me and the build issue
mailing list? Seems worth sending to the maintainers etc since it is a
Real Bug^tm.
Also, Julia - any chance of an improved error message here? I was
scratching my head saying wtf cos IS_ERR() and PTR_ERR() are the right
things to use here - missing that the inconsistency was the variable
passed to it. Would something like "inconsistent argument passed to IS_ERR()
and PTR_ERR() on line $" be an improvement here?
Cheers,
Conor.
>
> vim +1142 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-microchip-host.c
>
> 1118
> 1119 static int mc_host_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> 1120 {
> 1121 struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> 1122 void __iomem *apb_base_addr;
> 1123 int ret;
> 1124 u32 val;
> 1125
> 1126 port = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*port), GFP_KERNEL);
> 1127 if (!port)
> 1128 return -ENOMEM;
> 1129
> 1130 port->dev = dev;
> 1131
> 1132 port->bridge_base_addr = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "bridge");
> 1133 port->ctrl_base_addr = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "ctrl");
> 1134 if(!IS_ERR(port->bridge_base_addr) && !IS_ERR(port->ctrl_base_addr))
> 1135 goto addrs_set;
> 1136
> 1137 /*
> 1138 * The original, incorrect, binding that lumped the control and
> 1139 * bridge addresses together still needs to be handled by the driver.
> 1140 */
> 1141 apb_base_addr = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "apb");
> > 1142 if (IS_ERR(apb_base_addr))
> > 1143 return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(port->bridge_base_addr),
> 1144 "both legacy apb register and ctrl/bridge regions missing");
> 1145
> 1146 port->bridge_base_addr = apb_base_addr + MC_PCIE1_BRIDGE_ADDR;
> 1147 port->ctrl_base_addr = apb_base_addr + MC_PCIE1_CTRL_ADDR;
> 1148
> 1149 addrs_set:
> 1150 mc_disable_interrupts(port);
> 1151
> 1152 /* Allow enabling MSI by disabling MSI-X */
> 1153 val = readl(port->bridge_base_addr + PCIE_PCI_IRQ_DW0);
> 1154 val &= ~MSIX_CAP_MASK;
> 1155 writel(val, port->bridge_base_addr + PCIE_PCI_IRQ_DW0);
> 1156
> 1157 /* Pick num vectors from bitfile programmed onto FPGA fabric */
> 1158 val = readl(port->bridge_base_addr + PCIE_PCI_IRQ_DW0);
> 1159 val &= NUM_MSI_MSGS_MASK;
> 1160 val >>= NUM_MSI_MSGS_SHIFT;
> 1161
> 1162 port->msi.num_vectors = 1 << val;
> 1163
> 1164 /* Pick vector address from design */
> 1165 port->msi.vector_phy = readl_relaxed(port->bridge_base_addr + IMSI_ADDR);
> 1166
> 1167 ret = mc_pcie_init_clks(dev);
> 1168 if (ret) {
> 1169 dev_err(dev, "failed to get clock resources, error %d\n", ret);
> 1170 return -ENODEV;
> 1171 }
> 1172
> 1173 return pci_host_common_probe(pdev);
> 1174 }
> 1175
>
> --
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-03 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-01 10:22 [PATCH v3 0/2] PCI: microchip: support using either instance 1 or 2 Conor Dooley
2024-07-01 10:22 ` Conor Dooley
2024-07-01 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: PCI: microchip,pcie-host: fix reg properties Conor Dooley
2024-07-01 10:22 ` Conor Dooley
2024-07-01 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: microchip: rework reg region handing to support using either instance 1 or 2 Conor Dooley
2024-07-01 10:22 ` Conor Dooley
2024-07-03 20:01 ` kernel test robot
2024-07-03 20:14 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240703-persuaded-replace-abd30141b2eb@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.