All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: microchip: rework reg region handing to support using either instance 1 or 2
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 04:01:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202407040339.i1nFFozS-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240701-charger-recognize-fd8a65026a89@spud>

Hi Conor,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on pci/for-linus]
[also build test WARNING on robh/for-next linus/master v6.10-rc6]
[cannot apply to pci/next next-20240703]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Conor-Dooley/dt-bindings-PCI-microchip-pcie-host-fix-reg-properties/20240701-183154
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pci/pci.git for-linus
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240701-charger-recognize-fd8a65026a89%40spud
patch subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: microchip: rework reg region handing to support using either instance 1 or 2
config: x86_64-randconfig-102-20240703 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240704/202407040339.i1nFFozS-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-13 (Ubuntu 13.2.0-4ubuntu3) 13.2.0

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202407040339.i1nFFozS-lkp@intel.com/

cocci warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-microchip-host.c:1142:5-11: inconsistent IS_ERR and PTR_ERR on line 1143.

vim +1142 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-microchip-host.c

  1118	
  1119	static int mc_host_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  1120	{
  1121		struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
  1122		void __iomem *apb_base_addr;
  1123		int ret;
  1124		u32 val;
  1125	
  1126		port = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*port), GFP_KERNEL);
  1127		if (!port)
  1128			return -ENOMEM;
  1129	
  1130		port->dev = dev;
  1131	
  1132		port->bridge_base_addr = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "bridge");
  1133		port->ctrl_base_addr = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "ctrl");
  1134		if(!IS_ERR(port->bridge_base_addr) && !IS_ERR(port->ctrl_base_addr))
  1135			goto addrs_set;
  1136	
  1137		/*
  1138		 * The original, incorrect, binding that lumped the control and
  1139		 * bridge addresses together still needs to be handled by the driver.
  1140		 */
  1141		apb_base_addr = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "apb");
> 1142		if (IS_ERR(apb_base_addr))
> 1143			return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(port->bridge_base_addr),
  1144					     "both legacy apb register and ctrl/bridge regions missing");
  1145	
  1146		port->bridge_base_addr = apb_base_addr + MC_PCIE1_BRIDGE_ADDR;
  1147		port->ctrl_base_addr = apb_base_addr + MC_PCIE1_CTRL_ADDR;
  1148	
  1149	addrs_set:
  1150		mc_disable_interrupts(port);
  1151	
  1152		/* Allow enabling MSI by disabling MSI-X */
  1153		val = readl(port->bridge_base_addr + PCIE_PCI_IRQ_DW0);
  1154		val &= ~MSIX_CAP_MASK;
  1155		writel(val, port->bridge_base_addr + PCIE_PCI_IRQ_DW0);
  1156	
  1157		/* Pick num vectors from bitfile programmed onto FPGA fabric */
  1158		val = readl(port->bridge_base_addr + PCIE_PCI_IRQ_DW0);
  1159		val &= NUM_MSI_MSGS_MASK;
  1160		val >>= NUM_MSI_MSGS_SHIFT;
  1161	
  1162		port->msi.num_vectors = 1 << val;
  1163	
  1164		/* Pick vector address from design */
  1165		port->msi.vector_phy = readl_relaxed(port->bridge_base_addr + IMSI_ADDR);
  1166	
  1167		ret = mc_pcie_init_clks(dev);
  1168		if (ret) {
  1169			dev_err(dev, "failed to get clock resources, error %d\n", ret);
  1170			return -ENODEV;
  1171		}
  1172	
  1173		return pci_host_common_probe(pdev);
  1174	}
  1175	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-03 20:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-01 10:22 [PATCH v3 0/2] PCI: microchip: support using either instance 1 or 2 Conor Dooley
2024-07-01 10:22 ` Conor Dooley
2024-07-01 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: PCI: microchip,pcie-host: fix reg properties Conor Dooley
2024-07-01 10:22   ` Conor Dooley
2024-07-01 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: microchip: rework reg region handing to support using either instance 1 or 2 Conor Dooley
2024-07-01 10:22   ` Conor Dooley
2024-07-03 20:01   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-07-03 20:14     ` Conor Dooley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202407040339.i1nFFozS-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.