From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: run savedefconfig for defconfig
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 12:21:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240722-unlovely-snowflake-75e44dfd22fa@wendy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdXc_VPRLg1N_uCerXzzntJ23pq6m3Jb5eSPVZjxuXjHAg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1201 bytes --]
On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 01:05:10PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Conor,
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 3:29 PM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote:
> > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> >
> > It's been a while since this was run, and there's a few things that have
> > changed. Firstly, almost all of the Renesas stuff vanishes because the
> > config for the RZ/Five is gated behind NONPORTABLE. Several options
> > (like CONFIG_PM) are removed as they are the default values.
> >
> > To retain DEFVFREQ_THERMAL and BLK_DEV_THROTTLING, add PM_DEVFREQ and
> > BLK_CGROUP respectively.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> Perhaps we should add an rzfive_defconfig?
I dunno, do we want (potentially a bunch of) platform specific
defconfigs? I'd sooner delete the ones that we have than add more!
I would suggest to just turn on NONPORTABLE, but that isn't a solution
given that the RZ/Five support requires turning off Zicbom. Ultimately I
think it is Palmer's decision whether we add a defconfig for the
platform - it is a bit of a special case given the aforementioned
incompatibility.
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] RISC-V: run savedefconfig for defconfig
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 12:21:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240722-unlovely-snowflake-75e44dfd22fa@wendy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdXc_VPRLg1N_uCerXzzntJ23pq6m3Jb5eSPVZjxuXjHAg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1201 bytes --]
On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 01:05:10PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Conor,
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 3:29 PM Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> wrote:
> > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
> >
> > It's been a while since this was run, and there's a few things that have
> > changed. Firstly, almost all of the Renesas stuff vanishes because the
> > config for the RZ/Five is gated behind NONPORTABLE. Several options
> > (like CONFIG_PM) are removed as they are the default values.
> >
> > To retain DEFVFREQ_THERMAL and BLK_DEV_THROTTLING, add PM_DEVFREQ and
> > BLK_CGROUP respectively.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> Perhaps we should add an rzfive_defconfig?
I dunno, do we want (potentially a bunch of) platform specific
defconfigs? I'd sooner delete the ones that we have than add more!
I would suggest to just turn on NONPORTABLE, but that isn't a solution
given that the RZ/Five support requires turning off Zicbom. Ultimately I
think it is Palmer's decision whether we add a defconfig for the
platform - it is a bit of a special case given the aforementioned
incompatibility.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-22 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-17 13:29 [PATCH v1] RISC-V: run savedefconfig for defconfig Conor Dooley
2024-07-17 13:29 ` Conor Dooley
2024-07-19 11:05 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-07-19 11:05 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-07-22 11:21 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2024-07-22 11:21 ` Conor Dooley
2024-07-23 12:58 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
2024-07-23 12:58 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240722-unlovely-snowflake-75e44dfd22fa@wendy \
--to=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.