From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Cc: "Daniel P .\" =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Berrang=E9?= <berrange@redhat.com>,
Eduardo Habkost <eduardo@habkost.net>,
Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
Philippe =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= <philmd@linaro.org>,
Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>,
Michael S.Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>,
Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Alex =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Sia Jee Heng <jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@intel.com>"@domain.invalid
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] hw/core: Check smp cache topology support for machine
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 13:47:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240722134716.000067b8@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240704031603.1744546-5-zhao1.liu@intel.com>
On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 11:15:59 +0800
Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> Add cache_supported flags in SMPCompatProps to allow machines to
> configure various caches support.
>
> And implement check() method for machine's "smp-cache" link property,
> which will check the compatibility of the cache properties with the
> machine support.
One question inline.
> Signed-off-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
> ---
> Changes since RFC v2:
> * Split as a separate commit to just include compatibility checking and
> topology checking.
> * Allow setting "default" topology level even though the cache
> isn't supported by machine. (Daniel)
> ---
> hw/core/machine-smp.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> hw/core/machine.c | 17 +++++++--
> include/hw/boards.h | 6 ++++
> 3 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/core/machine-smp.c b/hw/core/machine-smp.c
> index 88a73743eb1c..bf6f2f91070d 100644
> --- a/hw/core/machine-smp.c
> +++ b/hw/core/machine-smp.c
> @@ -276,3 +276,83 @@ CpuTopologyLevel machine_get_cache_topo_level(const MachineState *ms,
> {
> return ms->smp_cache->props[cache].topo;
> }
> +
> +static bool machine_check_topo_support(MachineState *ms,
> + CpuTopologyLevel topo,
> + Error **errp)
> +{
> + MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(ms);
> +
> + if ((topo == CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_MODULE && !mc->smp_props.modules_supported) ||
I can sort of understand why they will always be supported but why not include
core and socket in here just to avoid the complexity of wondering if they are?
> + (topo == CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_CLUSTER && !mc->smp_props.clusters_supported) ||
> + (topo == CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_DIE && !mc->smp_props.dies_supported) ||
> + (topo == CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_BOOK && !mc->smp_props.books_supported) ||
> + (topo == CPU_TOPO_LEVEL_DRAWER && !mc->smp_props.drawers_supported)) {
> + error_setg(errp,
> + "Invalid topology level: %s. "
> + "The topology level is not supported by this machine",
> + CpuTopologyLevel_str(topo));
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-22 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-04 3:15 [PATCH 0/8] Introduce SMP Cache Topology Zhao Liu
2024-07-04 3:15 ` [PATCH 1/8] hw/core: Make CPU topology enumeration arch-agnostic Zhao Liu
2024-07-22 11:56 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-07-22 12:25 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-22 13:24 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-07-22 14:01 ` Zhao Liu
2024-07-23 10:14 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-07-23 14:40 ` Zhao Liu
2024-07-04 3:15 ` [PATCH 2/8] qapi/qom: Introduce smp-cache object Zhao Liu
2024-07-09 10:13 ` Zhao Liu
2024-07-22 12:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-22 13:33 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-07-22 14:30 ` Zhao Liu
2024-07-24 11:35 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-07-24 12:47 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2024-07-24 14:03 ` Zhao Liu
2024-07-24 15:10 ` Zhao Liu
2024-07-24 14:55 ` Zhao Liu
2024-07-25 8:51 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-07-25 10:50 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-25 10:59 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2024-07-25 10:59 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2024-07-25 10:59 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-25 11:58 ` Zhao Liu
2024-07-25 11:56 ` Zhao Liu
2024-07-04 3:15 ` [PATCH 3/8] hw/core: Add smp cache topology for machine Zhao Liu
2024-07-22 12:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-04 3:15 ` [PATCH 4/8] hw/core: Check smp cache topology support " Zhao Liu
2024-07-22 12:47 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-07-04 3:16 ` [PATCH 5/8] i386/cpu: Support thread and module level cache topology Zhao Liu
2024-07-04 3:16 ` [PATCH 6/8] i386/cpu: Update cache topology with machine's configuration Zhao Liu
2024-07-04 3:16 ` [PATCH 7/8] i386/pc: Support cache topology in -machine for PC machine Zhao Liu
2024-07-04 3:16 ` [PATCH 8/8] qemu-options: Add the description of smp-cache object Zhao Liu
2024-07-22 13:37 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-07-22 14:42 ` Zhao Liu
2024-07-24 12:39 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-07-24 14:21 ` Zhao Liu
2024-07-25 9:07 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-08-01 9:37 ` Zhao Liu
2024-08-01 11:28 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-08-02 7:58 ` Zhao Liu
2024-08-07 10:00 ` Zhao Liu
2024-08-09 12:24 ` Markus Armbruster
2024-08-12 9:24 ` Zhao Liu
2024-08-14 12:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-07-22 7:33 ` [PATCH 0/8] Introduce SMP Cache Topology Zhao Liu
2024-07-22 7:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2024-07-22 12:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240722134716.000067b8@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc="Daniel P .\" =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Berrang=E9?= <berrange@redhat.com>, Eduardo Habkost <eduardo@habkost.net>, Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>, Philippe =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= <philmd@linaro.org>, Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>, Michael S.Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, Alex =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= <alex.bennee@linaro.org>, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Sia Jee Heng <jeeheng.sia@starfivetech.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, Zhenyu Wang <zhenyu.z.wang@intel.com>, Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>, Yongwei Ma <yongwei.ma@intel.com>"@domain.invalid \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.