All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	leit@meta.com, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
	"open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: skbuff: Skip early return in skb_unref when debugging
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 12:50:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240730105012.GA1809@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e6b1f967-aaf4-47f4-be33-c981a7abc120@redhat.com>

Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> wrote:
> >   	else if (likely(!refcount_dec_and_test(&skb->users)))
> >   		return false;
> 
> I think one assumption behind CONFIG_DEBUG_NET is that enabling such config
> should not have any measurable impact on performances.

If thats the case why does it exist at all?

I was under impression that entire reason for CONFIG_DEBUG_NET was
to enable more checks for fuzzers and the like, i.e. NOT for production
kernels.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-30 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-29 10:47 [PATCH net-next] net: skbuff: Skip early return in skb_unref when debugging Breno Leitao
2024-07-30  9:38 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-07-30 10:24   ` Breno Leitao
2024-07-30 10:50   ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2024-07-30 11:15     ` Paolo Abeni
2024-07-30 14:10       ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-07-30 14:21         ` Eric Dumazet
2024-07-30 14:37         ` Paolo Abeni
2024-07-30 14:48           ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-07-31 11:24   ` Breno Leitao
2024-07-31 11:53     ` Jason Xing
2024-08-01  9:07     ` Paolo Abeni
2024-08-01  9:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240730105012.GA1809@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=leit@meta.com \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.