From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/3] firmware: ti_sci: Introduce Power Management Ops
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2024 14:31:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202408031302.28NpPykP-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240801195422.2296347-2-msp@baylibre.com>
Hi Markus,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on soc/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.11-rc1 next-20240802]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Markus-Schneider-Pargmann/firmware-ti_sci-Introduce-Power-Management-Ops/20240803-041746
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240801195422.2296347-2-msp%40baylibre.com
patch subject: [PATCH v8 1/3] firmware: ti_sci: Introduce Power Management Ops
config: arm-keystone_defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240803/202408031302.28NpPykP-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 14.1.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240803/202408031302.28NpPykP-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408031302.28NpPykP-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:1886:12: warning: 'ti_sci_cmd_set_latency_constraint' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
1886 | static int ti_sci_cmd_set_latency_constraint(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:1832:12: warning: 'ti_sci_cmd_set_device_constraint' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
1832 | static int ti_sci_cmd_set_device_constraint(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:1779:12: warning: 'ti_sci_cmd_set_io_isolation' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
1779 | static int ti_sci_cmd_set_io_isolation(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:1664:12: warning: 'ti_sci_cmd_prepare_sleep' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
1664 | static int ti_sci_cmd_prepare_sleep(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle, u8 mode,
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/ti_sci_cmd_set_io_isolation +1779 drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
1653
1654 /**
1655 * ti_sci_cmd_prepare_sleep() - Prepare system for system suspend
1656 * @handle: pointer to TI SCI handle
1657 * @mode: Device identifier
1658 * @ctx_lo: Low part of address for context save
1659 * @ctx_hi: High part of address for context save
1660 * @debug_flags: Debug flags to pass to firmware
1661 *
1662 * Return: 0 if all went well, else returns appropriate error value.
1663 */
> 1664 static int ti_sci_cmd_prepare_sleep(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle, u8 mode,
1665 u32 ctx_lo, u32 ctx_hi, u32 debug_flags)
1666 {
1667 struct ti_sci_info *info;
1668 struct ti_sci_msg_req_prepare_sleep *req;
1669 struct ti_sci_msg_hdr *resp;
1670 struct ti_sci_xfer *xfer;
1671 struct device *dev;
1672 int ret = 0;
1673
1674 if (IS_ERR(handle))
1675 return PTR_ERR(handle);
1676 if (!handle)
1677 return -EINVAL;
1678
1679 info = handle_to_ti_sci_info(handle);
1680 dev = info->dev;
1681
1682 xfer = ti_sci_get_one_xfer(info, TI_SCI_MSG_PREPARE_SLEEP,
1683 TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED,
1684 sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
1685 if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
1686 ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
1687 dev_err(dev, "Message alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
1688 return ret;
1689 }
1690
1691 req = (struct ti_sci_msg_req_prepare_sleep *)xfer->xfer_buf;
1692 req->mode = mode;
1693 req->ctx_lo = ctx_lo;
1694 req->ctx_hi = ctx_hi;
1695 req->debug_flags = debug_flags;
1696
1697 ret = ti_sci_do_xfer(info, xfer);
1698 if (ret) {
1699 dev_err(dev, "Mbox send fail %d\n", ret);
1700 goto fail;
1701 }
1702
1703 resp = (struct ti_sci_msg_hdr *)xfer->xfer_buf;
1704
1705 ret = ti_sci_is_response_ack(resp) ? 0 : -ENODEV;
1706
1707 fail:
1708 ti_sci_put_one_xfer(&info->minfo, xfer);
1709
1710 return ret;
1711 }
1712
1713 /**
1714 * ti_sci_msg_cmd_lpm_wake_reason() - Get the wakeup source from LPM
1715 * @handle: Pointer to TI SCI handle
1716 * @source: The wakeup source that woke the SoC from LPM
1717 * @timestamp: Timestamp of the wakeup event
1718 *
1719 * Return: 0 if all went well, else returns appropriate error value.
1720 */
1721 static int ti_sci_msg_cmd_lpm_wake_reason(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
1722 u32 *source, u64 *timestamp)
1723 {
1724 struct ti_sci_info *info;
1725 struct ti_sci_xfer *xfer;
1726 struct ti_sci_msg_resp_lpm_wake_reason *resp;
1727 struct device *dev;
1728 int ret = 0;
1729
1730 if (IS_ERR(handle))
1731 return PTR_ERR(handle);
1732 if (!handle)
1733 return -EINVAL;
1734
1735 info = handle_to_ti_sci_info(handle);
1736 dev = info->dev;
1737
1738 xfer = ti_sci_get_one_xfer(info, TI_SCI_MSG_LPM_WAKE_REASON,
1739 TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED,
1740 sizeof(struct ti_sci_msg_hdr),
1741 sizeof(*resp));
1742 if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
1743 ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
1744 dev_err(dev, "Message alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
1745 return ret;
1746 }
1747
1748 ret = ti_sci_do_xfer(info, xfer);
1749 if (ret) {
1750 dev_err(dev, "Mbox send fail %d\n", ret);
1751 goto fail;
1752 }
1753
1754 resp = (struct ti_sci_msg_resp_lpm_wake_reason *)xfer->xfer_buf;
1755
1756 if (!ti_sci_is_response_ack(resp)) {
1757 ret = -ENODEV;
1758 goto fail;
1759 }
1760
1761 if (source)
1762 *source = resp->wake_source;
1763 if (timestamp)
1764 *timestamp = resp->wake_timestamp;
1765
1766 fail:
1767 ti_sci_put_one_xfer(&info->minfo, xfer);
1768
1769 return ret;
1770 }
1771
1772 /**
1773 * ti_sci_cmd_set_io_isolation() - Enable IO isolation in LPM
1774 * @handle: Pointer to TI SCI handle
1775 * @state: The desired state of the IO isolation
1776 *
1777 * Return: 0 if all went well, else returns appropriate error value.
1778 */
> 1779 static int ti_sci_cmd_set_io_isolation(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
1780 u8 state)
1781 {
1782 struct ti_sci_info *info;
1783 struct ti_sci_msg_req_set_io_isolation *req;
1784 struct ti_sci_msg_hdr *resp;
1785 struct ti_sci_xfer *xfer;
1786 struct device *dev;
1787 int ret = 0;
1788
1789 if (IS_ERR(handle))
1790 return PTR_ERR(handle);
1791 if (!handle)
1792 return -EINVAL;
1793
1794 info = handle_to_ti_sci_info(handle);
1795 dev = info->dev;
1796
1797 xfer = ti_sci_get_one_xfer(info, TI_SCI_MSG_SET_IO_ISOLATION,
1798 TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED,
1799 sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
1800 if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
1801 ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
1802 dev_err(dev, "Message alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
1803 return ret;
1804 }
1805 req = (struct ti_sci_msg_req_set_io_isolation *)xfer->xfer_buf;
1806 req->state = state;
1807
1808 ret = ti_sci_do_xfer(info, xfer);
1809 if (ret) {
1810 dev_err(dev, "Mbox send fail %d\n", ret);
1811 goto fail;
1812 }
1813
1814 resp = (struct ti_sci_msg_hdr *)xfer->xfer_buf;
1815
1816 ret = ti_sci_is_response_ack(resp) ? 0 : -ENODEV;
1817
1818 fail:
1819 ti_sci_put_one_xfer(&info->minfo, xfer);
1820
1821 return ret;
1822 }
1823
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-03 6:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-01 19:54 [PATCH v8 0/3] firmware: ti_sci: Introduce system suspend support Markus Schneider-Pargmann
2024-08-01 19:54 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] firmware: ti_sci: Introduce Power Management Ops Markus Schneider-Pargmann
2024-08-03 6:31 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-08-06 15:39 ` Nishanth Menon
2024-08-06 18:47 ` Markus Schneider-Pargmann
2024-08-01 19:54 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] firmware: ti_sci: Add support for querying the firmware caps Markus Schneider-Pargmann
2024-08-06 15:42 ` Nishanth Menon
2024-08-01 19:54 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] firmware: ti_sci: Add system suspend and resume call Markus Schneider-Pargmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202408031302.28NpPykP-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=msp@baylibre.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.