All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
Subject: [linux-next:master 3246/3984] kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:303:2: error: call to undeclared function 'rcu_tasks_torture_stats_print'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2024 03:55:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202408110343.A2yLpRdP-lkp@intel.com> (raw)

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
head:   61c01d2e181adfba02fe09764f9fca1de2be0dbe
commit: 628ea78b8d1057d4709b38730a1f181e9607ad23 [3246/3984] rcuscale: Print detailed grace-period and barrier diagnostics
config: x86_64-randconfig-074-20240809 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240811/202408110343.A2yLpRdP-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 18.1.5 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 617a15a9eac96088ae5e9134248d8236e34b91b1)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240811/202408110343.A2yLpRdP-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408110343.A2yLpRdP-lkp@intel.com/

Note: the linux-next/master HEAD 61c01d2e181adfba02fe09764f9fca1de2be0dbe builds fine.
      It may have been fixed somewhere.

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:303:2: error: call to undeclared function 'rcu_tasks_torture_stats_print'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     303 |         rcu_tasks_torture_stats_print(scale_type, SCALE_FLAG);
         |         ^
   kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:303:2: note: did you mean 'srcu_torture_stats_print'?
   include/linux/srcutree.h:192:6: note: 'srcu_torture_stats_print' declared here
     192 | void srcu_torture_stats_print(struct srcu_struct *ssp, char *tt, char *tf);
         |      ^
>> kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:347:2: error: call to undeclared function 'rcu_tasks_rude_torture_stats_print'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     347 |         rcu_tasks_rude_torture_stats_print(scale_type, SCALE_FLAG);
         |         ^
>> kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:393:2: error: call to undeclared function 'rcu_tasks_trace_torture_stats_print'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     393 |         rcu_tasks_trace_torture_stats_print(scale_type, SCALE_FLAG);
         |         ^
   3 errors generated.


vim +/rcu_tasks_torture_stats_print +303 kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c

   300	
   301	static void rcu_tasks_scale_stats(void)
   302	{
 > 303		rcu_tasks_torture_stats_print(scale_type, SCALE_FLAG);
   304	}
   305	
   306	static struct rcu_scale_ops tasks_ops = {
   307		.ptype		= RCU_TASKS_FLAVOR,
   308		.init		= rcu_sync_scale_init,
   309		.readlock	= tasks_scale_read_lock,
   310		.readunlock	= tasks_scale_read_unlock,
   311		.get_gp_seq	= rcu_no_completed,
   312		.gp_diff	= rcu_seq_diff,
   313		.async		= call_rcu_tasks,
   314		.gp_barrier	= rcu_barrier_tasks,
   315		.sync		= synchronize_rcu_tasks,
   316		.exp_sync	= synchronize_rcu_tasks,
   317		.rso_gp_kthread	= get_rcu_tasks_gp_kthread,
   318		.stats		= IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TINY_RCU) ? NULL : rcu_tasks_scale_stats,
   319		.name		= "tasks"
   320	};
   321	
   322	#define TASKS_OPS &tasks_ops,
   323	
   324	#else // #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU
   325	
   326	#define TASKS_OPS
   327	
   328	#endif // #else // #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU
   329	
   330	#ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RUDE_RCU
   331	
   332	/*
   333	 * Definitions for RCU-tasks-rude scalability testing.
   334	 */
   335	
   336	static int tasks_rude_scale_read_lock(void)
   337	{
   338		return 0;
   339	}
   340	
   341	static void tasks_rude_scale_read_unlock(int idx)
   342	{
   343	}
   344	
   345	static void rcu_tasks_rude_scale_stats(void)
   346	{
 > 347		rcu_tasks_rude_torture_stats_print(scale_type, SCALE_FLAG);
   348	}
   349	
   350	static struct rcu_scale_ops tasks_rude_ops = {
   351		.ptype		= RCU_TASKS_RUDE_FLAVOR,
   352		.init		= rcu_sync_scale_init,
   353		.readlock	= tasks_rude_scale_read_lock,
   354		.readunlock	= tasks_rude_scale_read_unlock,
   355		.get_gp_seq	= rcu_no_completed,
   356		.gp_diff	= rcu_seq_diff,
   357		.async		= call_rcu_tasks_rude,
   358		.gp_barrier	= rcu_barrier_tasks_rude,
   359		.sync		= synchronize_rcu_tasks_rude,
   360		.exp_sync	= synchronize_rcu_tasks_rude,
   361		.rso_gp_kthread	= get_rcu_tasks_rude_gp_kthread,
   362		.stats		= IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TINY_RCU) ? NULL : rcu_tasks_rude_scale_stats,
   363		.name		= "tasks-rude"
   364	};
   365	
   366	#define TASKS_RUDE_OPS &tasks_rude_ops,
   367	
   368	#else // #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RUDE_RCU
   369	
   370	#define TASKS_RUDE_OPS
   371	
   372	#endif // #else // #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RUDE_RCU
   373	
   374	#ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU
   375	
   376	/*
   377	 * Definitions for RCU-tasks-trace scalability testing.
   378	 */
   379	
   380	static int tasks_trace_scale_read_lock(void)
   381	{
   382		rcu_read_lock_trace();
   383		return 0;
   384	}
   385	
   386	static void tasks_trace_scale_read_unlock(int idx)
   387	{
   388		rcu_read_unlock_trace();
   389	}
   390	
   391	static void rcu_tasks_trace_scale_stats(void)
   392	{
 > 393		rcu_tasks_trace_torture_stats_print(scale_type, SCALE_FLAG);
   394	}
   395	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

             reply	other threads:[~2024-08-10 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-10 19:55 kernel test robot [this message]
2024-08-11  7:08 ` [linux-next:master 3246/3984] kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:303:2: error: call to undeclared function 'rcu_tasks_torture_stats_print'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations Neeraj Upadhyay

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202408110343.A2yLpRdP-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.