From: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@kernel.org>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master 3246/3984] kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:303:2: error: call to undeclared function 'rcu_tasks_torture_stats_print'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2024 12:38:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240811070859.GA977168@neeraj.linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202408110343.A2yLpRdP-lkp@intel.com>
On Sun, Aug 11, 2024 at 03:55:37AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> head: 61c01d2e181adfba02fe09764f9fca1de2be0dbe
> commit: 628ea78b8d1057d4709b38730a1f181e9607ad23 [3246/3984] rcuscale: Print detailed grace-period and barrier diagnostics
> config: x86_64-randconfig-074-20240809 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240811/202408110343.A2yLpRdP-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: clang version 18.1.5 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 617a15a9eac96088ae5e9134248d8236e34b91b1)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240811/202408110343.A2yLpRdP-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202408110343.A2yLpRdP-lkp@intel.com/
>
> Note: the linux-next/master HEAD 61c01d2e181adfba02fe09764f9fca1de2be0dbe builds fine.
> It may have been fixed somewhere.
>
Thanks for reporting this! I have fixed the order of below 2 commits here
[1]
cb4b877e9d5f rcu/tasks: Add detailed grace-period and barrier diagnostics
d9562675f501 rcuscale: Print detailed grace-period and barrier diagnostics
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rcu/linux.git/log/?h=next
- Neeraj
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> >> kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:303:2: error: call to undeclared function 'rcu_tasks_torture_stats_print'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 303 | rcu_tasks_torture_stats_print(scale_type, SCALE_FLAG);
> | ^
> kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:303:2: note: did you mean 'srcu_torture_stats_print'?
> include/linux/srcutree.h:192:6: note: 'srcu_torture_stats_print' declared here
> 192 | void srcu_torture_stats_print(struct srcu_struct *ssp, char *tt, char *tf);
> | ^
> >> kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:347:2: error: call to undeclared function 'rcu_tasks_rude_torture_stats_print'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 347 | rcu_tasks_rude_torture_stats_print(scale_type, SCALE_FLAG);
> | ^
> >> kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:393:2: error: call to undeclared function 'rcu_tasks_trace_torture_stats_print'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 393 | rcu_tasks_trace_torture_stats_print(scale_type, SCALE_FLAG);
> | ^
> 3 errors generated.
>
>
> vim +/rcu_tasks_torture_stats_print +303 kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c
>
> 300
> 301 static void rcu_tasks_scale_stats(void)
> 302 {
> > 303 rcu_tasks_torture_stats_print(scale_type, SCALE_FLAG);
> 304 }
> 305
> 306 static struct rcu_scale_ops tasks_ops = {
> 307 .ptype = RCU_TASKS_FLAVOR,
> 308 .init = rcu_sync_scale_init,
> 309 .readlock = tasks_scale_read_lock,
> 310 .readunlock = tasks_scale_read_unlock,
> 311 .get_gp_seq = rcu_no_completed,
> 312 .gp_diff = rcu_seq_diff,
> 313 .async = call_rcu_tasks,
> 314 .gp_barrier = rcu_barrier_tasks,
> 315 .sync = synchronize_rcu_tasks,
> 316 .exp_sync = synchronize_rcu_tasks,
> 317 .rso_gp_kthread = get_rcu_tasks_gp_kthread,
> 318 .stats = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TINY_RCU) ? NULL : rcu_tasks_scale_stats,
> 319 .name = "tasks"
> 320 };
> 321
> 322 #define TASKS_OPS &tasks_ops,
> 323
> 324 #else // #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU
> 325
> 326 #define TASKS_OPS
> 327
> 328 #endif // #else // #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RCU
> 329
> 330 #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RUDE_RCU
> 331
> 332 /*
> 333 * Definitions for RCU-tasks-rude scalability testing.
> 334 */
> 335
> 336 static int tasks_rude_scale_read_lock(void)
> 337 {
> 338 return 0;
> 339 }
> 340
> 341 static void tasks_rude_scale_read_unlock(int idx)
> 342 {
> 343 }
> 344
> 345 static void rcu_tasks_rude_scale_stats(void)
> 346 {
> > 347 rcu_tasks_rude_torture_stats_print(scale_type, SCALE_FLAG);
> 348 }
> 349
> 350 static struct rcu_scale_ops tasks_rude_ops = {
> 351 .ptype = RCU_TASKS_RUDE_FLAVOR,
> 352 .init = rcu_sync_scale_init,
> 353 .readlock = tasks_rude_scale_read_lock,
> 354 .readunlock = tasks_rude_scale_read_unlock,
> 355 .get_gp_seq = rcu_no_completed,
> 356 .gp_diff = rcu_seq_diff,
> 357 .async = call_rcu_tasks_rude,
> 358 .gp_barrier = rcu_barrier_tasks_rude,
> 359 .sync = synchronize_rcu_tasks_rude,
> 360 .exp_sync = synchronize_rcu_tasks_rude,
> 361 .rso_gp_kthread = get_rcu_tasks_rude_gp_kthread,
> 362 .stats = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TINY_RCU) ? NULL : rcu_tasks_rude_scale_stats,
> 363 .name = "tasks-rude"
> 364 };
> 365
> 366 #define TASKS_RUDE_OPS &tasks_rude_ops,
> 367
> 368 #else // #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RUDE_RCU
> 369
> 370 #define TASKS_RUDE_OPS
> 371
> 372 #endif // #else // #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_RUDE_RCU
> 373
> 374 #ifdef CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU
> 375
> 376 /*
> 377 * Definitions for RCU-tasks-trace scalability testing.
> 378 */
> 379
> 380 static int tasks_trace_scale_read_lock(void)
> 381 {
> 382 rcu_read_lock_trace();
> 383 return 0;
> 384 }
> 385
> 386 static void tasks_trace_scale_read_unlock(int idx)
> 387 {
> 388 rcu_read_unlock_trace();
> 389 }
> 390
> 391 static void rcu_tasks_trace_scale_stats(void)
> 392 {
> > 393 rcu_tasks_trace_torture_stats_print(scale_type, SCALE_FLAG);
> 394 }
> 395
>
> --
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-11 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-10 19:55 [linux-next:master 3246/3984] kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:303:2: error: call to undeclared function 'rcu_tasks_torture_stats_print'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations kernel test robot
2024-08-11 7:08 ` Neeraj Upadhyay [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240811070859.GA977168@neeraj.linux \
--to=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.