From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpuidle: riscv-sbi: Use scoped device node handling to simplify error paths
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:13:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240819171313.00004677@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240816150931.142208-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 17:09:29 +0200
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> Obtain the device node reference with scoped/cleanup.h to reduce error
> handling and make the code a bit simpler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
The original code looks suspect. See below.
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c | 21 +++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> index a6e123dfe394..5bb3401220d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "cpuidle-riscv-sbi: " fmt
>
> +#include <linux/cleanup.h>
> #include <linux/cpuhotplug.h>
> #include <linux/cpuidle.h>
> #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> @@ -236,19 +237,16 @@ static int sbi_cpuidle_dt_init_states(struct device *dev,
> {
> struct sbi_cpuidle_data *data = per_cpu_ptr(&sbi_cpuidle_data, cpu);
> struct device_node *state_node;
> - struct device_node *cpu_node;
> u32 *states;
> int i, ret;
>
> - cpu_node = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
> + struct device_node *cpu_node __free(device_node) = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
> if (!cpu_node)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> states = devm_kcalloc(dev, state_count, sizeof(*states), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!states) {
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto fail;
> - }
> + if (!states)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> /* Parse SBI specific details from state DT nodes */
> for (i = 1; i < state_count; i++) {
> @@ -264,10 +262,8 @@ static int sbi_cpuidle_dt_init_states(struct device *dev,
>
> pr_debug("sbi-state %#x index %d\n", states[i], i);
> }
> - if (i != state_count) {
> - ret = -ENODEV;
> - goto fail;
> - }
> + if (i != state_count)
> + return -ENODEV;
>
> /* Initialize optional data, used for the hierarchical topology. */
> ret = sbi_dt_cpu_init_topology(drv, data, state_count, cpu);
The handling of error ret from here doesn't free the node.
Bug or something subtle I'm missing?
If it's a bug, then fixes tag.
> @@ -277,10 +273,7 @@ static int sbi_cpuidle_dt_init_states(struct device *dev,
> /* Store states in the per-cpu struct. */
> data->states = states;
>
> -fail:
> - of_node_put(cpu_node);
> -
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static void sbi_cpuidle_deinit_cpu(int cpu)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] cpuidle: riscv-sbi: Use scoped device node handling to simplify error paths
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2024 17:13:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240819171313.00004677@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240816150931.142208-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
On Fri, 16 Aug 2024 17:09:29 +0200
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> Obtain the device node reference with scoped/cleanup.h to reduce error
> handling and make the code a bit simpler.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
The original code looks suspect. See below.
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c | 21 +++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> index a6e123dfe394..5bb3401220d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
>
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "cpuidle-riscv-sbi: " fmt
>
> +#include <linux/cleanup.h>
> #include <linux/cpuhotplug.h>
> #include <linux/cpuidle.h>
> #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> @@ -236,19 +237,16 @@ static int sbi_cpuidle_dt_init_states(struct device *dev,
> {
> struct sbi_cpuidle_data *data = per_cpu_ptr(&sbi_cpuidle_data, cpu);
> struct device_node *state_node;
> - struct device_node *cpu_node;
> u32 *states;
> int i, ret;
>
> - cpu_node = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
> + struct device_node *cpu_node __free(device_node) = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
> if (!cpu_node)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> states = devm_kcalloc(dev, state_count, sizeof(*states), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!states) {
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto fail;
> - }
> + if (!states)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> /* Parse SBI specific details from state DT nodes */
> for (i = 1; i < state_count; i++) {
> @@ -264,10 +262,8 @@ static int sbi_cpuidle_dt_init_states(struct device *dev,
>
> pr_debug("sbi-state %#x index %d\n", states[i], i);
> }
> - if (i != state_count) {
> - ret = -ENODEV;
> - goto fail;
> - }
> + if (i != state_count)
> + return -ENODEV;
>
> /* Initialize optional data, used for the hierarchical topology. */
> ret = sbi_dt_cpu_init_topology(drv, data, state_count, cpu);
The handling of error ret from here doesn't free the node.
Bug or something subtle I'm missing?
If it's a bug, then fixes tag.
> @@ -277,10 +273,7 @@ static int sbi_cpuidle_dt_init_states(struct device *dev,
> /* Store states in the per-cpu struct. */
> data->states = states;
>
> -fail:
> - of_node_put(cpu_node);
> -
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static void sbi_cpuidle_deinit_cpu(int cpu)
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-19 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-16 15:09 [PATCH 1/4] cpuidle: psci: Simplify with scoped for each OF child loop Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-16 15:09 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-16 15:09 ` [PATCH 2/4] cpuidle: riscv-sbi: Use scoped device node handling to simplify error paths Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-16 15:09 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-19 16:13 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2024-08-19 16:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-19 16:19 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-19 16:19 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-20 9:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-20 9:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-21 11:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-21 11:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-20 9:29 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-20 9:29 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-16 15:09 ` [PATCH 3/4] cpuidle: riscv-sbi: Simplify with scoped for each OF child loop Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-16 15:09 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-19 16:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-19 16:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-16 15:09 ` [PATCH 4/4] cpuidle: dt_idle_genpd: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-16 15:09 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-19 16:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-19 16:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-20 9:34 ` Ulf Hansson
2024-08-20 9:34 ` Ulf Hansson
2024-08-19 16:11 ` [PATCH 1/4] cpuidle: psci: " Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-19 16:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2024-08-20 9:33 ` Ulf Hansson
2024-08-20 9:33 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240819171313.00004677@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.