Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] rcar-vin: Add support for R-Car V4M

["Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>]

Hello,

On 2024-08-20 09:34:55 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 6:16 PM Niklas Söderlund
> <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se> wrote:
> > This series adds bindings and support to rcar-vin for R-Car V4M by the
> > means of adding a Gen4 family fallback compatible.
> >
> > Previous versions of this series added V4M support like done for VIN
> > since the first Gen3 device, by the use of only a single SoC specific
> > compatible value. This was done as in Gen3 almost every new device
> > differed from the others and a family fallback was not very useful.
> >
> > For the Gen4 devices with a video capture pipeline currently documented
> > the VIN instances are very similar and a family fallback can be used.
> > This however requires updating existing DTS files to add this new family
> > fallback. This is done in a backward compatible way and the driver
> > retains the compatible values.
> >
> > See individual patches for changes since previous versions.
> >
> > Niklas Söderlund (6):
> >   dt-bindings: media: renesas,vin: Add Gen4 family fallback
> >   arm64: dts: renesas: r8a779g0: Add family fallback for VIN IP
> >   arm64: dts: renesas: r8a779a0: Add family fallback for VIN IP
> >   media: rcar-vin: Add family compatible for R-Car Gen4 family
> >   dt-bindings: media: renesas,vin: Add binding for V4M
> >   arm64: dts: renesas: r8a779h0: Add family fallback for VIN IP
> 
> Any chance the media parts can be accepted, so I can take the DTS
> patches through the Renesas tree?

I would be happy to have some feedback on the media parts as well as I 
will need to send a very similar series for the rcar-isp driver to add a 
family fallback for Gen4. But I have hold of on posting them until I 
knew this is the correct path forward.

> 
> BTW, running b4 seems to add two bogus Acked-by tags from Conor:
> 
> $ b4 am 20240704161620.1425409-3-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se
> Analyzing 7 messages in the thread
> Analyzing 14 code-review messages
> Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment...
> ---
>   ✗ [PATCH v5 1/6] dt-bindings: media: renesas,vin: Add Gen4 family fallback
>   ✗ [PATCH v5 2/6] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a779g0: Add family fallback for VIN IP
>     + Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> (✓ DKIM/kernel.org)
>   ✗ [PATCH v5 3/6] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a779a0: Add family fallback for VIN IP
>   ✗ [PATCH v5 4/6] media: rcar-vin: Add family compatible for R-Car Gen4 family
>   ✗ [PATCH v5 5/6] dt-bindings: media: renesas,vin: Add binding for V4M
>   ✗ [PATCH v5 6/6] arm64: dts: renesas: r8a779h0: Add family fallback for VIN IP
>     + Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> (✓ DKIM/kernel.org)
> 
> I cannot find these Acks in my inbox or on lore.
> What's happening?

No idea, I can't find any Acks from Conner in my inbox neither. Both 
patches in question where new in v4 of the series.

-- 
Kind Regards,
Niklas Söderlund