From: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@suse.com>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>,
Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] nvme: core: shorten duration of multipath namespace rescan
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 16:22:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240826142241.53601-1-mwilck@suse.com> (raw)
For multipath devices, nvme_update_ns_info() needs to freeze both
the queue of the path and the queue of the multipath device. For
both operations, it waits for one RCU grace period to pass, ~25ms
on my test system. By calling blk_freeze_queue_start() for the
multipath queue early, we avoid waiting twice; tests using ftrace
have shown that the second blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait() call finishes
in just a few microseconds. The path queue is unfrozen before
calling blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait() on the multipath queue, so that
possibly outstanding IO in the multipath queue can be flushed.
I tested this using the "controller rescan under I/O load" test
I submitted recently [1].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/20240822193814.106111-3-mwilck@suse.com/T/#u
Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>
---
v2: (all changes suggested by Sagi Grimberg)
- patch subject changed from "nvme: core: freeze multipath queue early in
nvme_update_ns_info()" to "nvme: core: shorten duration of multipath
namespace rescan"
- inserted comment explaining why blk_freeze_queue_start() is called early
- wait for queue to be frozen even if ret != 0
- make code structure more obvious vs. freeze_start / freeze_wait / unfreeze
Hannes and Daniel had already added Reviewed-by: tags to the v1 patch, but
I didn't add them above, because the patch looks quite different now.
---
drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index 0dc8bcc664f2..1ea052450846 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -2217,6 +2217,16 @@ static int nvme_update_ns_info(struct nvme_ns *ns, struct nvme_ns_info *info)
bool unsupported = false;
int ret;
+ /*
+ * The controller queue is going to be frozen in
+ * nvme_update_ns_info_{generic,block}(). Every freeze implies waiting
+ * for an RCU grace period to pass. For multipath devices, we
+ * need to freeze the multipath queue, too. Start freezing the
+ * multipath queue now, lest we need to wait for two grace periods.
+ */
+ if (nvme_ns_head_multipath(ns->head))
+ blk_freeze_queue_start(ns->head->disk->queue);
+
switch (info->ids.csi) {
case NVME_CSI_ZNS:
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED)) {
@@ -2250,11 +2260,13 @@ static int nvme_update_ns_info(struct nvme_ns *ns, struct nvme_ns_info *info)
ret = 0;
}
- if (!ret && nvme_ns_head_multipath(ns->head)) {
+ if (!nvme_ns_head_multipath(ns->head))
+ return ret;
+
+ blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait(ns->head->disk->queue);
+ if (!ret) {
struct queue_limits *ns_lim = &ns->disk->queue->limits;
struct queue_limits lim;
-
- blk_mq_freeze_queue(ns->head->disk->queue);
/*
* queue_limits mixes values that are the hardware limitations
* for bio splitting with what is the device configuration.
@@ -2286,9 +2298,8 @@ static int nvme_update_ns_info(struct nvme_ns *ns, struct nvme_ns_info *info)
set_capacity_and_notify(ns->head->disk, get_capacity(ns->disk));
set_disk_ro(ns->head->disk, nvme_ns_is_readonly(ns, info));
nvme_mpath_revalidate_paths(ns);
-
- blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(ns->head->disk->queue);
}
+ blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(ns->head->disk->queue);
return ret;
}
--
2.46.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-08-26 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-26 14:22 Martin Wilck [this message]
2024-08-26 14:30 ` [PATCH v2] nvme: core: shorten duration of multipath namespace rescan Sagi Grimberg
2024-08-26 14:31 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-08-26 15:46 ` Martin Wilck
2024-08-27 7:33 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240826142241.53601-1-mwilck@suse.com \
--to=martin.wilck@suse.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dwagner@suse.de \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mwilck@suse.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.