From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>, <michal.simek@amd.com>,
<richard@nod.at>, <vigneshr@ti.com>, <liang.yang@amlogic.com>,
<neil.armstrong@linaro.org>, <khilman@baylibre.com>,
<jbrunet@baylibre.com>, <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>, <heiko@sntech.de>,
<mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>, <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
<wens@csie.org>, <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
<samuel@sholland.org>, <kees@kernel.org>, <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
<linux@treblig.org>, <robh@kernel.org>,
<u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>, <erick.archer@gmx.com>,
<christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>, <val@packett.cool>,
<christophe.kerello@foss.st.com>, <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>, <jic23@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next RESEND 00/10] mtd: Use for_each_child_of_node_scoped()
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 09:45:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240830094549.1c513ba2@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c29263ae-89f1-edd7-003a-bd03cdddc821@huawei.com>
Jinjie,
ruanjinjie@huawei.com wrote on Fri, 30 Aug 2024 14:34:38 +0800:
> On 2024/8/26 20:49, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > krzk@kernel.org wrote on Mon, 26 Aug 2024 12:19:07 +0200:
> >
> >> On 26/08/2024 11:52, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> >>> Hi Jinjie,
> >>>
> >>> ruanjinjie@huawei.com wrote on Mon, 26 Aug 2024 17:43:18 +0800:
> >>>
> >>>> Use scoped for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() when iterating over
> >>>> device nodes to make code a bit simpler.
> >>>
> >>> Why is this a resend ? Did I miss a previous iteration?
> >>
> >> You were not cc-ed on previous iteration. I asked for proper split
> >> between subsystems and sending to maintainers, thus this resend.
> >
> > Ok. Makes sense, and the patchset looks fine.
>
> Hi, Miquel,
>
> Could this series be merged, thank you!
You've sent this series on Monday, we are Friday. I answered a first
time within 5h and reviewed it within 8h. So that means I will take the
patchset:
- when I have the time to do so
- after several days to give a chance to other to review it as well
- unless someone speaks up against it in a "reasonable time frame"
- unless a robot that parses the patches on the mailing lists complains
about it (usually within few days, up to a week).
In general, a good rule of thumb is to refrain yourself from pinging
within 2 weeks for non-urgent matters like this series.
Thanks,
Miquèl
_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>, <michal.simek@amd.com>,
<richard@nod.at>, <vigneshr@ti.com>, <liang.yang@amlogic.com>,
<neil.armstrong@linaro.org>, <khilman@baylibre.com>,
<jbrunet@baylibre.com>, <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>, <heiko@sntech.de>,
<mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>, <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
<wens@csie.org>, <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
<samuel@sholland.org>, <kees@kernel.org>, <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
<linux@treblig.org>, <robh@kernel.org>,
<u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>, <erick.archer@gmx.com>,
<christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>, <val@packett.cool>,
<christophe.kerello@foss.st.com>, <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>, <jic23@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next RESEND 00/10] mtd: Use for_each_child_of_node_scoped()
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 09:45:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240830094549.1c513ba2@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c29263ae-89f1-edd7-003a-bd03cdddc821@huawei.com>
Jinjie,
ruanjinjie@huawei.com wrote on Fri, 30 Aug 2024 14:34:38 +0800:
> On 2024/8/26 20:49, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > krzk@kernel.org wrote on Mon, 26 Aug 2024 12:19:07 +0200:
> >
> >> On 26/08/2024 11:52, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> >>> Hi Jinjie,
> >>>
> >>> ruanjinjie@huawei.com wrote on Mon, 26 Aug 2024 17:43:18 +0800:
> >>>
> >>>> Use scoped for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() when iterating over
> >>>> device nodes to make code a bit simpler.
> >>>
> >>> Why is this a resend ? Did I miss a previous iteration?
> >>
> >> You were not cc-ed on previous iteration. I asked for proper split
> >> between subsystems and sending to maintainers, thus this resend.
> >
> > Ok. Makes sense, and the patchset looks fine.
>
> Hi, Miquel,
>
> Could this series be merged, thank you!
You've sent this series on Monday, we are Friday. I answered a first
time within 5h and reviewed it within 8h. So that means I will take the
patchset:
- when I have the time to do so
- after several days to give a chance to other to review it as well
- unless someone speaks up against it in a "reasonable time frame"
- unless a robot that parses the patches on the mailing lists complains
about it (usually within few days, up to a week).
In general, a good rule of thumb is to refrain yourself from pinging
within 2 weeks for non-urgent matters like this series.
Thanks,
Miquèl
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>, <michal.simek@amd.com>,
<richard@nod.at>, <vigneshr@ti.com>, <liang.yang@amlogic.com>,
<neil.armstrong@linaro.org>, <khilman@baylibre.com>,
<jbrunet@baylibre.com>, <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>, <heiko@sntech.de>,
<mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>, <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
<wens@csie.org>, <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
<samuel@sholland.org>, <kees@kernel.org>, <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
<linux@treblig.org>, <robh@kernel.org>,
<u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>, <erick.archer@gmx.com>,
<christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>, <val@packett.cool>,
<christophe.kerello@foss.st.com>, <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>, <jic23@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next RESEND 00/10] mtd: Use for_each_child_of_node_scoped()
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 09:45:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240830094549.1c513ba2@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c29263ae-89f1-edd7-003a-bd03cdddc821@huawei.com>
Jinjie,
ruanjinjie@huawei.com wrote on Fri, 30 Aug 2024 14:34:38 +0800:
> On 2024/8/26 20:49, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > krzk@kernel.org wrote on Mon, 26 Aug 2024 12:19:07 +0200:
> >
> >> On 26/08/2024 11:52, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> >>> Hi Jinjie,
> >>>
> >>> ruanjinjie@huawei.com wrote on Mon, 26 Aug 2024 17:43:18 +0800:
> >>>
> >>>> Use scoped for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() when iterating over
> >>>> device nodes to make code a bit simpler.
> >>>
> >>> Why is this a resend ? Did I miss a previous iteration?
> >>
> >> You were not cc-ed on previous iteration. I asked for proper split
> >> between subsystems and sending to maintainers, thus this resend.
> >
> > Ok. Makes sense, and the patchset looks fine.
>
> Hi, Miquel,
>
> Could this series be merged, thank you!
You've sent this series on Monday, we are Friday. I answered a first
time within 5h and reviewed it within 8h. So that means I will take the
patchset:
- when I have the time to do so
- after several days to give a chance to other to review it as well
- unless someone speaks up against it in a "reasonable time frame"
- unless a robot that parses the patches on the mailing lists complains
about it (usually within few days, up to a week).
In general, a good rule of thumb is to refrain yourself from pinging
within 2 weeks for non-urgent matters like this series.
Thanks,
Miquèl
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>, <michal.simek@amd.com>,
<richard@nod.at>, <vigneshr@ti.com>, <liang.yang@amlogic.com>,
<neil.armstrong@linaro.org>, <khilman@baylibre.com>,
<jbrunet@baylibre.com>, <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>, <heiko@sntech.de>,
<mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>, <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
<wens@csie.org>, <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
<samuel@sholland.org>, <kees@kernel.org>, <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
<linux@treblig.org>, <robh@kernel.org>,
<u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>, <erick.archer@gmx.com>,
<christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>, <val@packett.cool>,
<christophe.kerello@foss.st.com>, <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>, <jic23@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next RESEND 00/10] mtd: Use for_each_child_of_node_scoped()
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 09:45:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240830094549.1c513ba2@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c29263ae-89f1-edd7-003a-bd03cdddc821@huawei.com>
Jinjie,
ruanjinjie@huawei.com wrote on Fri, 30 Aug 2024 14:34:38 +0800:
> On 2024/8/26 20:49, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > krzk@kernel.org wrote on Mon, 26 Aug 2024 12:19:07 +0200:
> >
> >> On 26/08/2024 11:52, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> >>> Hi Jinjie,
> >>>
> >>> ruanjinjie@huawei.com wrote on Mon, 26 Aug 2024 17:43:18 +0800:
> >>>
> >>>> Use scoped for_each_available_child_of_node_scoped() when iterating over
> >>>> device nodes to make code a bit simpler.
> >>>
> >>> Why is this a resend ? Did I miss a previous iteration?
> >>
> >> You were not cc-ed on previous iteration. I asked for proper split
> >> between subsystems and sending to maintainers, thus this resend.
> >
> > Ok. Makes sense, and the patchset looks fine.
>
> Hi, Miquel,
>
> Could this series be merged, thank you!
You've sent this series on Monday, we are Friday. I answered a first
time within 5h and reviewed it within 8h. So that means I will take the
patchset:
- when I have the time to do so
- after several days to give a chance to other to review it as well
- unless someone speaks up against it in a "reasonable time frame"
- unless a robot that parses the patches on the mailing lists complains
about it (usually within few days, up to a week).
In general, a good rule of thumb is to refrain yourself from pinging
within 2 weeks for non-urgent matters like this series.
Thanks,
Miquèl
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-30 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 120+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-26 9:43 [PATCH -next RESEND 00/10] mtd: Use for_each_child_of_node_scoped() Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` [PATCH -next RESEND 01/10] mtd: rawnand: arasan: " Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-06 15:04 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:04 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:04 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:04 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-08-26 9:43 ` [PATCH -next RESEND 02/10] mtd: rawnand: cadence: " Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-06 15:04 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:04 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:04 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:04 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-08-26 9:43 ` [PATCH -next RESEND 03/10] mtd: rawnand: pl353: " Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-06 15:04 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:04 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:04 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:04 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-08-26 9:43 ` [PATCH -next RESEND 04/10] mtd: rawnand: marvell: drm/rockchip: " Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-06 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-08-26 9:43 ` [PATCH -next RESEND 05/10] mtd: rawnand: rockchip: " Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-06 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-08-26 9:43 ` [PATCH -next RESEND 06/10] mtd: rawnand: meson: " Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-06 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-08-26 9:43 ` [PATCH -next RESEND 07/10] mtd: rawnand: mtk: " Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-06 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-08-26 9:43 ` [PATCH -next RESEND 08/10] mtd: rawnand: renesas: " Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:53 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-08-26 9:53 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-08-26 9:53 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-08-26 9:53 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-09-06 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-08-26 9:43 ` [PATCH -next RESEND 09/10] mtd: rawnand: stm32_fmc2: " Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-06 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-08-26 9:43 ` [PATCH -next RESEND 10/10] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: " Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 9:43 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-06 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-09-06 15:03 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-08-26 9:52 ` [PATCH -next RESEND 00/10] mtd: " Miquel Raynal
2024-08-26 9:52 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-08-26 9:52 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-08-26 9:52 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-08-26 10:19 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-26 10:19 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-26 10:19 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-26 10:19 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-08-26 10:56 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 10:56 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 10:56 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 10:56 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 12:49 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-08-26 12:49 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-08-26 12:49 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-08-26 12:49 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-08-26 12:56 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 12:56 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 12:56 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 12:56 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-30 6:34 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-30 6:34 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-30 6:34 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-30 6:34 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-30 7:45 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2024-08-30 7:45 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-08-30 7:45 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-08-30 7:45 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-08-26 10:53 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 10:53 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 10:53 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-08-26 10:53 ` Jinjie Ruan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240830094549.1c513ba2@xps-13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=christophe.kerello@foss.st.com \
--cc=erick.archer@gmx.com \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=liang.yang@amlogic.com \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=linux@treblig.org \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=michal.simek@amd.com \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=val@packett.cool \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.