From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
edumazet@google.com, Madhu Chittim <madhu.chittim@intel.com>,
anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>,
Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com,
Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v5 net-next 02/12] net-shapers: implement NL get operation
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 11:39:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240830113900.4c5c9b2a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57ef8eb8-9534-4061-ba6c-4dadaf790c45@redhat.com>
On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 12:55:05 +0200 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On 8/30/24 03:20, Jakub Kicinski wrote:>> +/* Initialize the context
> fetching the relevant device and
> >> + * acquiring a reference to it.
> >> + */
> >> +static int net_shaper_ctx_init(const struct genl_info *info, int type,
> >> + struct net_shaper_nl_ctx *ctx)
> >> +{
> >> + struct net *ns = genl_info_net(info);
> >> + struct net_device *dev;
> >> + int ifindex;
> >> +
> >> + memset(ctx, 0, sizeof(*ctx));
> >> + if (GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, type))
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> + ifindex = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[type]);
> >
> > Let's limit the 'binding' thing to just driver call sites, we can
> > redo the rest easily later. This line and next pretends to take
> > "arbitrary" type but clearly wants a ifindex/netdev, right?
>
> There is a misunderstanding. This helper will be used in a following
> patch (7/12) with a different 'type' argument:
> NET_SHAPER_A_BINDING_IFINDEX. I've put a note in the commit message, but
> was unintentionally dropped in one of the recent refactors. I'll add
> that note back.
What I'm saying is that if you want to prep the ground for more
"binding" types you should also add:
if (type != ...IFINDEX) {
/* other binding types are TBD */
return -EINVAL;
}
> I hope you are ok with the struct net_shaper_binding * argument to most
> helpers? does not add complexity, will help to support devlink objects
> and swapping back and forth from/to struct net_device* can't be automated.
I am "okay" in the American sense of the word which AFAIU is "unhappy
but won't complain unless asked".
> > Maybe send a patch like this, to avoid having to allocate this space,
> > and special casing dump vs doit:
> >
> > diff --git a/include/net/genetlink.h b/include/net/genetlink.h
> > index 9ab49bfeae78..7658f0885178 100644
> > --- a/include/net/genetlink.h
> > +++ b/include/net/genetlink.h
> > @@ -124,7 +124,8 @@ struct genl_family {
> > * @genlhdr: generic netlink message header
> > * @attrs: netlink attributes
> > * @_net: network namespace
> > - * @user_ptr: user pointers
> > + * @ctx: storage space for the use by the family
> > + * @user_ptr: user pointers (deprecated, use ctx instead)
> > * @extack: extended ACK report struct
> > */
> > struct genl_info {
> > @@ -135,7 +136,10 @@ struct genl_info {
> > struct genlmsghdr * genlhdr;
> > struct nlattr ** attrs;
> > possible_net_t _net;
> > - void * user_ptr[2];
> > + union {
> > + u8 ctx[48];
> > + void * user_ptr[2];
> > + };
> > struct netlink_ext_ack *extack;
> > };
>
> Makes sense. Plus likely:
>
> #define NETLINK_CTX_SIZE 48
>
> and use such define above and in linux/netlink.h
Aha, would be good to also have a checking macro. Maybe rename
NL_ASSERT_DUMP_CTX_FITS()
to apply more broadly? or add a new one? Weak preference for former.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
Madhu Chittim <madhu.chittim@intel.com>,
Sridhar Samudrala <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@marvell.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>,
anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, edumazet@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 02/12] net-shapers: implement NL get operation
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2024 11:39:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240830113900.4c5c9b2a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57ef8eb8-9534-4061-ba6c-4dadaf790c45@redhat.com>
On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 12:55:05 +0200 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On 8/30/24 03:20, Jakub Kicinski wrote:>> +/* Initialize the context
> fetching the relevant device and
> >> + * acquiring a reference to it.
> >> + */
> >> +static int net_shaper_ctx_init(const struct genl_info *info, int type,
> >> + struct net_shaper_nl_ctx *ctx)
> >> +{
> >> + struct net *ns = genl_info_net(info);
> >> + struct net_device *dev;
> >> + int ifindex;
> >> +
> >> + memset(ctx, 0, sizeof(*ctx));
> >> + if (GENL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK(info, type))
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> + ifindex = nla_get_u32(info->attrs[type]);
> >
> > Let's limit the 'binding' thing to just driver call sites, we can
> > redo the rest easily later. This line and next pretends to take
> > "arbitrary" type but clearly wants a ifindex/netdev, right?
>
> There is a misunderstanding. This helper will be used in a following
> patch (7/12) with a different 'type' argument:
> NET_SHAPER_A_BINDING_IFINDEX. I've put a note in the commit message, but
> was unintentionally dropped in one of the recent refactors. I'll add
> that note back.
What I'm saying is that if you want to prep the ground for more
"binding" types you should also add:
if (type != ...IFINDEX) {
/* other binding types are TBD */
return -EINVAL;
}
> I hope you are ok with the struct net_shaper_binding * argument to most
> helpers? does not add complexity, will help to support devlink objects
> and swapping back and forth from/to struct net_device* can't be automated.
I am "okay" in the American sense of the word which AFAIU is "unhappy
but won't complain unless asked".
> > Maybe send a patch like this, to avoid having to allocate this space,
> > and special casing dump vs doit:
> >
> > diff --git a/include/net/genetlink.h b/include/net/genetlink.h
> > index 9ab49bfeae78..7658f0885178 100644
> > --- a/include/net/genetlink.h
> > +++ b/include/net/genetlink.h
> > @@ -124,7 +124,8 @@ struct genl_family {
> > * @genlhdr: generic netlink message header
> > * @attrs: netlink attributes
> > * @_net: network namespace
> > - * @user_ptr: user pointers
> > + * @ctx: storage space for the use by the family
> > + * @user_ptr: user pointers (deprecated, use ctx instead)
> > * @extack: extended ACK report struct
> > */
> > struct genl_info {
> > @@ -135,7 +136,10 @@ struct genl_info {
> > struct genlmsghdr * genlhdr;
> > struct nlattr ** attrs;
> > possible_net_t _net;
> > - void * user_ptr[2];
> > + union {
> > + u8 ctx[48];
> > + void * user_ptr[2];
> > + };
> > struct netlink_ext_ack *extack;
> > };
>
> Makes sense. Plus likely:
>
> #define NETLINK_CTX_SIZE 48
>
> and use such define above and in linux/netlink.h
Aha, would be good to also have a checking macro. Maybe rename
NL_ASSERT_DUMP_CTX_FITS()
to apply more broadly? or add a new one? Weak preference for former.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-30 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-29 15:16 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v5 net-next 00/12] net: introduce TX H/W shaping API Paolo Abeni
2024-08-29 15:16 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-08-29 15:16 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v5 net-next 01/12] netlink: spec: add shaper YAML spec Paolo Abeni
2024-08-29 15:16 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-08-29 15:16 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v5 net-next 02/12] net-shapers: implement NL get operation Paolo Abeni
2024-08-29 15:16 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-08-29 23:28 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-29 23:28 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-30 1:20 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-30 1:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-30 10:55 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Paolo Abeni
2024-08-30 10:55 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-08-30 18:39 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-08-30 18:39 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-30 23:42 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-30 23:42 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-09-02 13:00 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Paolo Abeni
2024-09-02 13:00 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-08-30 15:43 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Paolo Abeni
2024-08-30 15:43 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-08-30 19:14 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-30 19:14 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-09-02 10:10 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Paolo Abeni
2024-09-02 10:10 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-09-03 0:37 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2024-09-03 0:37 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-29 15:16 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v5 net-next 03/12] net-shapers: implement NL set and delete operations Paolo Abeni
2024-08-29 15:16 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-08-30 1:43 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-30 1:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-29 15:16 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v5 net-next 04/12] net-shapers: implement NL group operation Paolo Abeni
2024-08-29 15:16 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-08-30 2:04 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-30 2:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-30 16:48 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Paolo Abeni
2024-08-30 16:48 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-08-30 18:48 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-30 18:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-29 15:16 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v5 net-next 05/12] net-shapers: implement delete support for NODE scope shaper Paolo Abeni
2024-08-29 15:16 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-08-29 15:16 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v5 net-next 06/12] netlink: spec: add shaper introspection support Paolo Abeni
2024-08-29 15:16 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-08-29 15:17 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v5 net-next 07/12] net: shaper: implement " Paolo Abeni
2024-08-29 15:17 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-08-30 2:11 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-30 2:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-29 15:17 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v5 net-next 08/12] testing: net-drv: add basic shaper test Paolo Abeni
2024-08-29 15:17 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-08-29 15:17 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v5 net-next 09/12] virtchnl: support queue rate limit and quanta size configuration Paolo Abeni
2024-08-29 15:17 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-08-29 15:17 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v5 net-next 10/12] ice: Support VF " Paolo Abeni
2024-08-29 15:17 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-08-29 15:17 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v5 net-next 11/12] iavf: Add net_shaper_ops support Paolo Abeni
2024-08-29 15:17 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-08-30 2:09 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-30 2:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-29 15:17 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v5 net-next 12/12] iavf: add support to exchange qos capabilities Paolo Abeni
2024-08-29 15:17 ` Paolo Abeni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240830113900.4c5c9b2a@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=madhu.chittim@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=sgoutham@marvell.com \
--cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.