* [merged mm-stable] mm-memcg-dont-call-propagate_protected_usage-needlessly.patch removed from -mm tree
@ 2024-09-02 3:28 Andrew Morton
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2024-09-02 3:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mm-commits, songmuchun, shakeel.butt, mhocko, hannes,
roman.gushchin, akpm
The quilt patch titled
Subject: mm: memcg: don't call propagate_protected_usage() needlessly
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-memcg-dont-call-propagate_protected_usage-needlessly.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Subject: mm: memcg: don't call propagate_protected_usage() needlessly
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 20:31:08 +0000
Patch series "mm: memcg: page counters optimizations", v3.
This patchset contains 3 independent small optimizations of page counters.
This patch (of 3):
Memory protection (min/low) requires a constant tracking of protected
memory usage. propagate_protected_usage() is called on each page counters
update and does a number of operations even in cases when the actual
memory protection functionality is not supported (e.g. hugetlb cgroups or
memcg swap counters).
It's obviously inefficient and leads to a waste of CPU cycles. It can be
addressed by calling propagate_protected_usage() only for the counters
which do support memory guarantees. As of now it's only memcg->memory -
the unified memory memcg counter.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240726203110.1577216-2-roman.gushchin@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
include/linux/page_counter.h | 8 +++++++-
mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c | 4 ++--
mm/memcontrol.c | 16 ++++++++--------
mm/page_counter.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/page_counter.h~mm-memcg-dont-call-propagate_protected_usage-needlessly
+++ a/include/linux/page_counter.h
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct page_counter {
/* Keep all the read most fields in a separete cacheline. */
CACHELINE_PADDING(_pad2_);
+ bool protection_support;
unsigned long min;
unsigned long low;
unsigned long high;
@@ -44,12 +45,17 @@ struct page_counter {
#define PAGE_COUNTER_MAX (LONG_MAX / PAGE_SIZE)
#endif
+/*
+ * Protection is supported only for the first counter (with id 0).
+ */
static inline void page_counter_init(struct page_counter *counter,
- struct page_counter *parent)
+ struct page_counter *parent,
+ bool protection_support)
{
atomic_long_set(&counter->usage, 0);
counter->max = PAGE_COUNTER_MAX;
counter->parent = parent;
+ counter->protection_support = protection_support;
}
static inline unsigned long page_counter_read(struct page_counter *counter)
--- a/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c~mm-memcg-dont-call-propagate_protected_usage-needlessly
+++ a/mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c
@@ -114,10 +114,10 @@ static void hugetlb_cgroup_init(struct h
}
page_counter_init(hugetlb_cgroup_counter_from_cgroup(h_cgroup,
idx),
- fault_parent);
+ fault_parent, false);
page_counter_init(
hugetlb_cgroup_counter_from_cgroup_rsvd(h_cgroup, idx),
- rsvd_parent);
+ rsvd_parent, false);
limit = round_down(PAGE_COUNTER_MAX,
pages_per_huge_page(&hstates[idx]));
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c~mm-memcg-dont-call-propagate_protected_usage-needlessly
+++ a/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -3596,21 +3596,21 @@ mem_cgroup_css_alloc(struct cgroup_subsy
if (parent) {
WRITE_ONCE(memcg->swappiness, mem_cgroup_swappiness(parent));
- page_counter_init(&memcg->memory, &parent->memory);
- page_counter_init(&memcg->swap, &parent->swap);
+ page_counter_init(&memcg->memory, &parent->memory, true);
+ page_counter_init(&memcg->swap, &parent->swap, false);
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_V1
WRITE_ONCE(memcg->oom_kill_disable, READ_ONCE(parent->oom_kill_disable));
- page_counter_init(&memcg->kmem, &parent->kmem);
- page_counter_init(&memcg->tcpmem, &parent->tcpmem);
+ page_counter_init(&memcg->kmem, &parent->kmem, false);
+ page_counter_init(&memcg->tcpmem, &parent->tcpmem, false);
#endif
} else {
init_memcg_stats();
init_memcg_events();
- page_counter_init(&memcg->memory, NULL);
- page_counter_init(&memcg->swap, NULL);
+ page_counter_init(&memcg->memory, NULL, true);
+ page_counter_init(&memcg->swap, NULL, false);
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_V1
- page_counter_init(&memcg->kmem, NULL);
- page_counter_init(&memcg->tcpmem, NULL);
+ page_counter_init(&memcg->kmem, NULL, false);
+ page_counter_init(&memcg->tcpmem, NULL, false);
#endif
root_mem_cgroup = memcg;
return &memcg->css;
--- a/mm/page_counter.c~mm-memcg-dont-call-propagate_protected_usage-needlessly
+++ a/mm/page_counter.c
@@ -13,6 +13,11 @@
#include <linux/bug.h>
#include <asm/page.h>
+static bool track_protection(struct page_counter *c)
+{
+ return c->protection_support;
+}
+
static void propagate_protected_usage(struct page_counter *c,
unsigned long usage)
{
@@ -57,7 +62,8 @@ void page_counter_cancel(struct page_cou
new = 0;
atomic_long_set(&counter->usage, new);
}
- propagate_protected_usage(counter, new);
+ if (track_protection(counter))
+ propagate_protected_usage(counter, new);
}
/**
@@ -70,12 +76,14 @@ void page_counter_cancel(struct page_cou
void page_counter_charge(struct page_counter *counter, unsigned long nr_pages)
{
struct page_counter *c;
+ bool protection = track_protection(counter);
for (c = counter; c; c = c->parent) {
long new;
new = atomic_long_add_return(nr_pages, &c->usage);
- propagate_protected_usage(c, new);
+ if (protection)
+ propagate_protected_usage(c, new);
/*
* This is indeed racy, but we can live with some
* inaccuracy in the watermark.
@@ -99,6 +107,7 @@ bool page_counter_try_charge(struct page
struct page_counter **fail)
{
struct page_counter *c;
+ bool protection = track_protection(counter);
for (c = counter; c; c = c->parent) {
long new;
@@ -128,7 +137,9 @@ bool page_counter_try_charge(struct page
*fail = c;
goto failed;
}
- propagate_protected_usage(c, new);
+ if (protection)
+ propagate_protected_usage(c, new);
+
/*
* Just like with failcnt, we can live with some
* inaccuracy in the watermark.
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from roman.gushchin@linux.dev are
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2024-09-02 3:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-09-02 3:28 [merged mm-stable] mm-memcg-dont-call-propagate_protected_usage-needlessly.patch removed from -mm tree Andrew Morton
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.