From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
ncardwell@google.com, shuah@kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, fw@strlen.de,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
"Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@kernel.org>,
martineau@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC] selftests/net: integrate packetdrill with ksft
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 09:46:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240902094612.6d40a914@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <66d4d97a4cac_3df182941a@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
On Sun, 01 Sep 2024 17:15:38 -0400 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> Changing kselftests to preserve directories turns out to be trivial.
> Patch inline below.
>
> But, existing TARGETS of course then start failing. Because they
> depend on existing rsync without -R. In (at least) two ways:
>
> amd-pstate fails because its TEST_FILES has includes from other
> directories and it expects those files to land in the directory
> with tests.
>
> x86 prefixes all its output with $(OUTPUT) to form absolute paths,
> which also creates absolute paths in kselftest-list.txt.
>
> These two are examples, not necessarily the one instances of those
> patterns. So switching to preserving directories for existing targets
> like TEST_FILES seems intractable.
I wonder how many of the targets actually need this behavior (it's
intentionally useful to them) vs they grew to depend on it accidentally.
> Plan B is to add a new TEST_PROGS_RECURSE, analogous to how
> TEST_INCLUDES extended TEST_FILES with optional path preservation.
> That is not much more complex.
Alternative would be to allow opt-in (diff at the end), I'm personally
biased against yet another TEST_* group because it's hard enough already
to make sense of the existing ones. Maybe it's better for the test to
"declare":
PRESERVE_TEST_DIRS
---
tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk | 17 +++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk b/tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk
index d6edcfcb5be8..7be9bd583642 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk
@@ -51,6 +51,12 @@ else
CC := $(CROSS_COMPILE)gcc
endif # LLVM
+ifeq ($(PRESERVE_TEST_DIRS),)
+RSYNC_INSTALL_FLAGS=-a --copy-unsafe-links
+else
+RSYNC_INSTALL_FLAGS=-aR --copy-unsafe-links
+endif
+
ifeq (0,$(MAKELEVEL))
ifeq ($(OUTPUT),)
OUTPUT := $(shell pwd)
@@ -150,12 +156,12 @@ endif
define INSTALL_SINGLE_RULE
$(if $(INSTALL_LIST),@mkdir -p $(INSTALL_PATH))
- $(if $(INSTALL_LIST),rsync -a --copy-unsafe-links $(INSTALL_LIST) $(INSTALL_PATH)/)
+ $(if $(INSTALL_LIST),rsync $(RSYNC_INSTALL_FLAGS) $(INSTALL_LIST) $(INSTALL_PATH)/)
endef
define INSTALL_MODS_RULE
$(if $(INSTALL_LIST),@mkdir -p $(INSTALL_PATH)/$(INSTALL_LIST))
- $(if $(INSTALL_LIST),rsync -a --copy-unsafe-links $(INSTALL_LIST)/*.ko $(INSTALL_PATH)/$(INSTALL_LIST))
+ $(if $(INSTALL_LIST),rsync $(RSYNC_INSTALL_FLAGS) $(INSTALL_LIST)/*.ko $(INSTALL_PATH)/$(INSTALL_LIST))
endef
define INSTALL_RULE
@@ -179,10 +185,17 @@ else
endif
emit_tests:
+ifeq ($(PRESERVE_TEST_DIRS),)
for TEST in $(TEST_GEN_PROGS) $(TEST_CUSTOM_PROGS) $(TEST_PROGS); do \
BASENAME_TEST=`basename $$TEST`; \
echo "$(COLLECTION):$$BASENAME_TEST"; \
done
+else
+ for TEST in $(TEST_GEN_PROGS) $(TEST_CUSTOM_PROGS) $(TEST_PROGS); do \
+ BASENAME_TEST=$$TEST; \
+ echo "$(COLLECTION):$$TEST"; \
+ done
+endif
# define if isn't already. It is undefined in make O= case.
ifeq ($(RM),)
--
2.46.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-02 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-27 19:32 [PATCH net-next RFC] selftests/net: integrate packetdrill with ksft Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-28 0:39 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-28 13:58 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-28 8:20 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-08-28 14:03 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-28 16:01 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-28 19:33 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-28 21:00 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-30 15:20 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-30 17:33 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-30 18:47 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-30 21:44 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-30 21:52 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-09-01 21:15 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-09-02 16:46 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2024-09-02 16:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-09-02 20:50 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-09-05 3:27 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-30 21:46 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-28 16:26 ` Matthieu Baerts
2024-08-28 15:01 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2024-08-28 15:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-28 15:43 ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-08-28 17:20 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2024-08-28 18:23 ` Jakub Kicinski
2024-08-28 18:36 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2024-08-28 18:26 ` Mina Almasry
2024-08-28 18:39 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240902094612.6d40a914@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martineau@kernel.org \
--cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.