From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 00/17] slab: add struct kmem_cache_args
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 09:56:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240905-work-kmem_cache_args-v4-0-ed45d5380679@kernel.org> (raw)
Hey,
This is v4 which allows NULL to be passed in the struct kmem_cache_args
argument of kmem_cache_create() and substitutes default parameters in
this case.
As discussed last week the various kmem_cache_*() functions should be
replaced by a unified function that is based around a struct, with only
the basic parameters passed separately.
Vlastimil already said that he would like to keep core parameters out
of the struct: name, object size, and flags. I personally don't care
much and would not object to moving everything into the struct but
that's a matter of taste and I yield that decision power to the
maintainer.
In the first version I pointed out that the choice of name is somewhat
forced as kmem_cache_create() is taken and the only way to reuse it
would be to replace all users in one go. Or to do a global
sed/kmem_cache_create()/kmem_cache_create2()/g. And then introduce
kmem_cache_setup(). That doesn't strike me as a viable option.
If we really cared about the *_create() suffix then an alternative might
be to do a sed/kmem_cache_setup()/kmem_cache_create()/g after every user
in the kernel is ported. I honestly don't think that's worth it but I
wanted to at least mention it to highlight the fact that this might lead
to a naming compromise.
However, I came up with an alternative using _Generic() to create a
compatibility layer that will call the correct variant of
kmem_cache_create() depending on whether struct kmem_cache_args is
passed or not. That compatibility layer can stay in place until we
updated all calls to be based on struct kmem_cache_args.
From a cursory grep (and not excluding Documentation mentions) we will
have to replace 44 kmem_cache_create_usercopy() calls and about 463
kmem_cache_create() calls which makes for a bit above 500 calls to port
to kmem_cache_setup(). That'll probably be good work for people getting
into kernel development.
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
---
Changes in v4:
- Allow NULL to be passed in the struct kmem_cache_args argument of
kmem_cache_create() and use default parameters in this case.
- Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240904-work-kmem_cache_args-v3-0-05db2179a8c2@kernel.org
Changes in v3:
- Reworded some commit messages.
- Picked up various RvBs.
- Added two patches to make two functions static inline.
- Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240903-work-kmem_cache_args-v2-0-76f97e9a4560@kernel.org
Changes in v2:
- Remove kmem_cache_setup() and add a compatibility layer built around
_Generic() so that we can keep the kmem_cache_create() name and type
switch on the third argument to either call __kmem_cache_create() or
__kmem_cache_create_args().
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240902-work-kmem_cache_args-v1-0-27d05bc05128@kernel.org
---
Christian Brauner (17):
slab: s/__kmem_cache_create/do_kmem_cache_create/g
slab: add struct kmem_cache_args
slab: port kmem_cache_create() to struct kmem_cache_args
slab: port kmem_cache_create_rcu() to struct kmem_cache_args
slab: port kmem_cache_create_usercopy() to struct kmem_cache_args
slab: pass struct kmem_cache_args to create_cache()
slab: pull kmem_cache_open() into do_kmem_cache_create()
slab: pass struct kmem_cache_args to do_kmem_cache_create()
slab: remove rcu_freeptr_offset from struct kmem_cache
slab: port KMEM_CACHE() to struct kmem_cache_args
slab: port KMEM_CACHE_USERCOPY() to struct kmem_cache_args
slab: create kmem_cache_create() compatibility layer
file: port to struct kmem_cache_args
slab: remove kmem_cache_create_rcu()
slab: make kmem_cache_create_usercopy() static inline
slab: make __kmem_cache_create() static inline
io_uring: port to struct kmem_cache_args
fs/file_table.c | 11 ++-
include/linux/slab.h | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
io_uring/io_uring.c | 14 ++--
mm/slab.h | 6 +-
mm/slab_common.c | 197 +++++++++++----------------------------------------
mm/slub.c | 162 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
6 files changed, 250 insertions(+), 270 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 6e016babce7c845ed015da25c7a097fa3482d95a
change-id: 20240902-work-kmem_cache_args-e9760972c7d4
next reply other threads:[~2024-09-05 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-05 7:56 Christian Brauner [this message]
2024-09-05 7:56 ` [PATCH v4 01/17] slab: s/__kmem_cache_create/do_kmem_cache_create/g Christian Brauner
2024-09-06 0:12 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-09-05 7:56 ` [PATCH v4 02/17] slab: add struct kmem_cache_args Christian Brauner
2024-09-06 0:15 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-09-05 7:56 ` [PATCH v4 03/17] slab: port kmem_cache_create() to " Christian Brauner
2024-09-06 0:43 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-09-05 7:56 ` [PATCH v4 04/17] slab: port kmem_cache_create_rcu() " Christian Brauner
2024-09-06 0:45 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-09-05 7:56 ` [PATCH v4 05/17] slab: port kmem_cache_create_usercopy() " Christian Brauner
2024-09-06 0:48 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-09-05 7:56 ` [PATCH v4 06/17] slab: pass struct kmem_cache_args to create_cache() Christian Brauner
2024-09-06 0:51 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-09-05 7:56 ` [PATCH v4 07/17] slab: pull kmem_cache_open() into do_kmem_cache_create() Christian Brauner
2024-09-06 0:53 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-09-05 7:56 ` [PATCH v4 08/17] slab: pass struct kmem_cache_args to do_kmem_cache_create() Christian Brauner
2024-09-06 0:54 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-09-05 7:56 ` [PATCH v4 09/17] slab: remove rcu_freeptr_offset from struct kmem_cache Christian Brauner
2024-09-06 0:55 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-09-05 7:56 ` [PATCH v4 10/17] slab: port KMEM_CACHE() to struct kmem_cache_args Christian Brauner
2024-09-06 0:58 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-09-05 7:56 ` [PATCH v4 11/17] slab: port KMEM_CACHE_USERCOPY() " Christian Brauner
2024-09-06 1:00 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-09-05 7:56 ` [PATCH v4 12/17] slab: create kmem_cache_create() compatibility layer Christian Brauner
2024-09-05 8:15 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-09-05 11:54 ` Vlastimil Babka
2024-09-06 1:05 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-09-05 7:56 ` [PATCH v4 13/17] file: port to struct kmem_cache_args Christian Brauner
2024-09-06 1:06 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-09-05 7:56 ` [PATCH v4 14/17] slab: remove kmem_cache_create_rcu() Christian Brauner
2024-09-06 1:08 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-09-05 7:56 ` [PATCH v4 15/17] slab: make kmem_cache_create_usercopy() static inline Christian Brauner
2024-09-05 8:15 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-09-06 1:08 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-09-05 7:56 ` [PATCH v4 16/17] slab: make __kmem_cache_create() " Christian Brauner
2024-09-05 8:16 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-09-06 1:10 ` Roman Gushchin
2024-09-05 7:57 ` [PATCH v4 17/17] io_uring: port to struct kmem_cache_args Christian Brauner
2024-09-05 12:02 ` [PATCH v4 00/17] slab: add " Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240905-work-kmem_cache_args-v4-0-ed45d5380679@kernel.org \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.