From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, thepacketgeek@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
davej@codemonkey.org.uk, vlad.wing@gmail.com, max@kutsevol.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 04/10] net: netconsole: rename body to msg_body
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 17:03:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240909160303.GC2097826@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240909130756.2722126-5-leitao@debian.org>
On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 06:07:45AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> With the introduction of the userdata concept, the term body has become
> ambiguous and less intuitive.
>
> To improve clarity, body is renamed to msg_body, making it clear that
> the body is not the only content following the header.
>
> In an upcoming patch, the term body_len will also be revised for further
> clarity.
>
> The current packet structure is as follows:
>
> release, header, body, [msg_body + userdata]
>
> Here, [msg_body + userdata] collectively forms what is currently
> referred to as "body." This renaming helps to distinguish and better
> understand each component of the packet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/netconsole.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/netconsole.c b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> index 8faea9422ea1..c312ad6d5cf8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/netconsole.c
> @@ -1092,22 +1092,22 @@ static void send_msg_fragmented(struct netconsole_target *nt,
> {
> static char buf[MAX_PRINT_CHUNK]; /* protected by target_list_lock */
> int offset = 0, userdata_len = 0;
> - const char *header, *body;
> - int header_len, body_len;
> + const char *header, *msgbody;
> + int header_len, msgbody_len;
> const char *release;
>
> if (userdata)
> userdata_len = nt->userdata_length;
>
> - /* need to insert extra header fields, detect header and body */
> + /* need to insert extra header fields, detect header and msgbody */
> header = msg;
> - body = memchr(msg, ';', msg_len);
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!body))
> + msgbody = memchr(msg, ';', msg_len);
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!msgbody))
> return;
>
> - header_len = body - header;
> - body_len = msg_len - header_len - 1;
> - body++;
> + header_len = msgbody - header;
> + msgbody_len = msg_len - header_len - 1;
> + msgbody++;
>
> /*
> * Transfer multiple chunks with the following extra header.
> @@ -1122,10 +1122,10 @@ static void send_msg_fragmented(struct netconsole_target *nt,
> memcpy(buf + release_len, header, header_len);
> header_len += release_len;
>
> - /* for now on, the header will be persisted, and the body
> + /* for now on, the header will be persisted, and the msgbody
> * will be replaced
> */
> - while (offset < body_len + userdata_len) {
> + while (offset < msgbody_len + userdata_len) {
> int this_header = header_len;
> int this_offset = 0;
> int this_chunk = 0;
> @@ -1133,23 +1133,31 @@ static void send_msg_fragmented(struct netconsole_target *nt,
> this_header += scnprintf(buf + this_header,
> sizeof(buf) - this_header,
> ",ncfrag=%d/%d;", offset,
> - body_len + userdata_len);
> + msgbody_len + userdata_len);
>
> - /* Not all body data has been written yet */
> - if (offset < body_len) {
> - this_chunk = min(body_len - offset,
> + /* Not all msgbody data has been written yet */
> + if (offset < msgbody_len) {
> + this_chunk = min(msgbody_len - offset,
> MAX_PRINT_CHUNK - this_header);
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(this_chunk <= 0))
> return;
> - memcpy(buf + this_header, body + offset, this_chunk);
> + memcpy(buf + this_header, msgbody + offset, this_chunk);
> this_offset += this_chunk;
> }
> - /* Body is fully written and there is pending userdata to write,
> - * append userdata in this chunk
> +
> + if (offset + this_offset >= msgbody_len)
> + /* msgbody was finally written, either in the previous
> + * messages and/or in the current buf. Time to write
> + * the userdata.
> + */
> + msgbody_written = true;
Something went a bit wrong somewhere, msgbody_written isn't declared
in this scope.
> +
> + /* Msg body is fully written and there is pending userdata to
> + * write, append userdata in this chunk
> */
> - if (offset + this_offset >= body_len &&
> - offset + this_offset < userdata_len + body_len) {
> - int sent_userdata = (offset + this_offset) - body_len;
> + if (offset + this_offset >= msgbody_len &&
> + offset + this_offset < userdata_len + msgbody_len) {
> + int sent_userdata = (offset + this_offset) - msgbody_len;
> int preceding_bytes = this_chunk + this_header;
>
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(sent_userdata < 0))
--
pw-bot: cr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-09 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-09 13:07 [PATCH net-next v2 00/10] netconsole refactoring and warning fix Breno Leitao
2024-09-09 13:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/10] net: netconsole: remove msg_ready variable Breno Leitao
2024-09-09 13:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/10] net: netconsole: split send_ext_msg_udp() function Breno Leitao
2024-09-09 15:58 ` Simon Horman
2024-09-09 13:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/10] net: netconsole: separate fragmented message handling in send_ext_msg Breno Leitao
2024-09-09 13:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/10] net: netconsole: rename body to msg_body Breno Leitao
2024-09-09 16:03 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2024-09-09 13:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/10] net: netconsole: introduce variable to track body length Breno Leitao
2024-09-09 13:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/10] net: netconsole: track explicitly if msgbody was written to buffer Breno Leitao
2024-09-09 13:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/10] net: netconsole: extract release appending into separate function Breno Leitao
2024-09-09 13:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/10] net: netconsole: do not pass userdata up to the tail Breno Leitao
2024-09-09 16:05 ` Simon Horman
2024-09-10 9:44 ` Breno Leitao
2024-09-09 13:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/10] net: netconsole: split send_msg_fragmented Breno Leitao
2024-09-09 13:07 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/10] net: netconsole: fix wrong warning Breno Leitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240909160303.GC2097826@kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=max@kutsevol.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=thepacketgeek@gmail.com \
--cc=vlad.wing@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.