From: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/rapl: Clean up cpumask and hotplug
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 10:10:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240913171033.2144124-2-kan.liang@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240913171033.2144124-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
The rapl pmu is die scope, which is supported by the generic perf_event
subsystem now.
Set the scope for the rapl PMU and remove all the cpumask and hotplug
codes.
Tested-by: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/events/rapl.c | 90 +++-----------------------------------
include/linux/cpuhotplug.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 85 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
index a6f31978a5b4..74b057737ea1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
@@ -148,7 +148,6 @@ struct rapl_model {
/* 1/2^hw_unit Joule */
static int rapl_hw_unit[NR_RAPL_DOMAINS] __read_mostly;
static struct rapl_pmus *rapl_pmus;
-static cpumask_t rapl_cpu_mask;
static unsigned int rapl_cntr_mask;
static u64 rapl_timer_ms;
static struct perf_msr *rapl_msrs;
@@ -369,8 +368,6 @@ static int rapl_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
if (event->cpu < 0)
return -EINVAL;
- event->event_caps |= PERF_EV_CAP_READ_ACTIVE_PKG;
-
if (!cfg || cfg >= NR_RAPL_DOMAINS + 1)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -389,7 +386,6 @@ static int rapl_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
pmu = cpu_to_rapl_pmu(event->cpu);
if (!pmu)
return -EINVAL;
- event->cpu = pmu->cpu;
event->pmu_private = pmu;
event->hw.event_base = rapl_msrs[bit].msr;
event->hw.config = cfg;
@@ -403,23 +399,6 @@ static void rapl_pmu_event_read(struct perf_event *event)
rapl_event_update(event);
}
-static ssize_t rapl_get_attr_cpumask(struct device *dev,
- struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
-{
- return cpumap_print_to_pagebuf(true, buf, &rapl_cpu_mask);
-}
-
-static DEVICE_ATTR(cpumask, S_IRUGO, rapl_get_attr_cpumask, NULL);
-
-static struct attribute *rapl_pmu_attrs[] = {
- &dev_attr_cpumask.attr,
- NULL,
-};
-
-static struct attribute_group rapl_pmu_attr_group = {
- .attrs = rapl_pmu_attrs,
-};
-
RAPL_EVENT_ATTR_STR(energy-cores, rapl_cores, "event=0x01");
RAPL_EVENT_ATTR_STR(energy-pkg , rapl_pkg, "event=0x02");
RAPL_EVENT_ATTR_STR(energy-ram , rapl_ram, "event=0x03");
@@ -467,7 +446,6 @@ static struct attribute_group rapl_pmu_format_group = {
};
static const struct attribute_group *rapl_attr_groups[] = {
- &rapl_pmu_attr_group,
&rapl_pmu_format_group,
&rapl_pmu_events_group,
NULL,
@@ -570,54 +548,6 @@ static struct perf_msr amd_rapl_msrs[] = {
[PERF_RAPL_PSYS] = { 0, &rapl_events_psys_group, NULL, false, 0 },
};
-static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
-{
- struct rapl_pmu *pmu = cpu_to_rapl_pmu(cpu);
- int target;
-
- /* Check if exiting cpu is used for collecting rapl events */
- if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &rapl_cpu_mask))
- return 0;
-
- pmu->cpu = -1;
- /* Find a new cpu to collect rapl events */
- target = cpumask_any_but(get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(cpu), cpu);
-
- /* Migrate rapl events to the new target */
- if (target < nr_cpu_ids) {
- cpumask_set_cpu(target, &rapl_cpu_mask);
- pmu->cpu = target;
- perf_pmu_migrate_context(pmu->pmu, cpu, target);
- }
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int rapl_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
-{
- s32 rapl_pmu_idx = get_rapl_pmu_idx(cpu);
- if (rapl_pmu_idx < 0) {
- pr_err("topology_logical_(package/die)_id() returned a negative value");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
- struct rapl_pmu *pmu = cpu_to_rapl_pmu(cpu);
- int target;
-
- if (!pmu)
- return -ENOMEM;
-
- /*
- * Check if there is an online cpu in the package which collects rapl
- * events already.
- */
- target = cpumask_any_and(&rapl_cpu_mask, get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(cpu));
- if (target < nr_cpu_ids)
- return 0;
-
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &rapl_cpu_mask);
- pmu->cpu = cpu;
- return 0;
-}
-
static int rapl_check_hw_unit(struct rapl_model *rm)
{
u64 msr_rapl_power_unit_bits;
@@ -731,9 +661,12 @@ static void __init init_rapl_pmu(void)
static int __init init_rapl_pmus(void)
{
int nr_rapl_pmu = topology_max_packages();
+ int rapl_pmu_scope = PERF_PMU_SCOPE_PKG;
- if (!rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope())
+ if (!rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope()) {
nr_rapl_pmu *= topology_max_dies_per_package();
+ rapl_pmu_scope = PERF_PMU_SCOPE_DIE;
+ }
rapl_pmus = kzalloc(struct_size(rapl_pmus, pmus, nr_rapl_pmu), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!rapl_pmus)
@@ -749,6 +682,7 @@ static int __init init_rapl_pmus(void)
rapl_pmus->pmu.start = rapl_pmu_event_start;
rapl_pmus->pmu.stop = rapl_pmu_event_stop;
rapl_pmus->pmu.read = rapl_pmu_event_read;
+ rapl_pmus->pmu.scope = rapl_pmu_scope;
rapl_pmus->pmu.module = THIS_MODULE;
rapl_pmus->pmu.capabilities = PERF_PMU_CAP_NO_EXCLUDE;
@@ -900,24 +834,13 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void)
if (ret)
return ret;
- /*
- * Install callbacks. Core will call them for each online cpu.
- */
- ret = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_PERF_X86_RAPL_ONLINE,
- "perf/x86/rapl:online",
- rapl_cpu_online, rapl_cpu_offline);
- if (ret)
- goto out;
-
ret = perf_pmu_register(&rapl_pmus->pmu, "power", -1);
if (ret)
- goto out1;
+ goto out;
rapl_advertise();
return 0;
-out1:
- cpuhp_remove_state(CPUHP_AP_PERF_X86_RAPL_ONLINE);
out:
pr_warn("Initialization failed (%d), disabled\n", ret);
cleanup_rapl_pmus();
@@ -927,7 +850,6 @@ module_init(rapl_pmu_init);
static void __exit intel_rapl_exit(void)
{
- cpuhp_remove_state_nocalls(CPUHP_AP_PERF_X86_RAPL_ONLINE);
perf_pmu_unregister(&rapl_pmus->pmu);
cleanup_rapl_pmus();
}
diff --git a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
index 2101ae2ecfca..801053c45c88 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
@@ -207,7 +207,6 @@ enum cpuhp_state {
CPUHP_AP_PERF_X86_UNCORE_ONLINE,
CPUHP_AP_PERF_X86_AMD_UNCORE_ONLINE,
CPUHP_AP_PERF_X86_AMD_POWER_ONLINE,
- CPUHP_AP_PERF_X86_RAPL_ONLINE,
CPUHP_AP_PERF_S390_CF_ONLINE,
CPUHP_AP_PERF_S390_SF_ONLINE,
CPUHP_AP_PERF_ARM_CCI_ONLINE,
--
2.38.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-13 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-13 17:10 [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/rapl: Move the pmu allocation out of CPU hotplug kan.liang
2024-09-13 17:10 ` kan.liang [this message]
2024-10-08 16:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-08 20:10 ` Liang, Kan
2024-10-08 20:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-08 20:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-08 21:05 ` Liang, Kan
2024-10-08 22:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240913171033.2144124-2-kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.