From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
To: kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] target/riscv: enable floating point unit
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 08:05:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240918-039d1e3bebf2231bd452a5ad@orel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8b24728f-8b6e-4c79-91f6-7cbb79494550@canonical.com>
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 06:45:21PM GMT, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
...
> When thinking about the migration of virtual machines shouldn't QEMU be in
> control of the initial state of vcpus instead of KVM?
>
Thinking about this more, I'm inclined to agree. Initial state and reset
state should be traits of the VMM (potentially influenced by the user)
rather than KVM.
Thanks,
drew
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
To: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>,
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>, Weiwei Li <liwei1518@gmail.com>,
Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>,
Liu Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>,
qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] target/riscv: enable floating point unit
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 08:05:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240918-039d1e3bebf2231bd452a5ad@orel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8b24728f-8b6e-4c79-91f6-7cbb79494550@canonical.com>
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 06:45:21PM GMT, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
...
> When thinking about the migration of virtual machines shouldn't QEMU be in
> control of the initial state of vcpus instead of KVM?
>
Thinking about this more, I'm inclined to agree. Initial state and reset
state should be traits of the VMM (potentially influenced by the user)
rather than KVM.
Thanks,
drew
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
To: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>,
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>, Weiwei Li <liwei1518@gmail.com>,
Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>,
Liu Zhiwei <zhiwei_liu@linux.alibaba.com>,
qemu-riscv@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] target/riscv: enable floating point unit
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2024 08:05:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240918-039d1e3bebf2231bd452a5ad@orel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8b24728f-8b6e-4c79-91f6-7cbb79494550@canonical.com>
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 06:45:21PM GMT, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
...
> When thinking about the migration of virtual machines shouldn't QEMU be in
> control of the initial state of vcpus instead of KVM?
>
Thinking about this more, I'm inclined to agree. Initial state and reset
state should be traits of the VMM (potentially influenced by the user)
rather than KVM.
Thanks,
drew
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-18 6:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-16 18:16 [PATCH 1/1] target/riscv: enable floating point unit Heinrich Schuchardt
2024-09-17 12:13 ` Andrew Jones
2024-09-17 13:28 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2024-09-17 14:49 ` Andrew Jones
2024-09-17 16:45 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2024-09-17 16:45 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2024-09-17 16:45 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2024-09-18 6:05 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2024-09-18 6:05 ` Andrew Jones
2024-09-18 6:05 ` Andrew Jones
2024-09-18 11:10 ` Peter Maydell
2024-09-18 11:10 ` Peter Maydell
2024-09-18 11:10 ` Peter Maydell
2024-09-18 13:06 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2024-09-18 13:06 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2024-09-18 13:06 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2024-09-18 13:12 ` Peter Maydell
2024-09-18 13:12 ` Peter Maydell
2024-09-18 13:12 ` Peter Maydell
2024-09-18 13:49 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2024-09-18 13:49 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2024-09-18 13:49 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2024-09-18 13:56 ` Andrew Jones
2024-09-18 13:56 ` Andrew Jones
2024-09-18 13:56 ` Andrew Jones
2024-09-18 15:49 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2024-09-18 15:49 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2024-09-18 15:49 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2024-09-18 15:32 ` Peter Maydell
2024-09-18 15:32 ` Peter Maydell
2024-09-18 15:32 ` Peter Maydell
2024-09-18 16:27 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2024-09-18 16:27 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2024-09-18 16:27 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2024-10-08 0:45 ` Alistair Francis
2024-10-08 0:45 ` Alistair Francis
2024-10-08 0:45 ` Alistair Francis
2024-09-18 14:38 ` Richard Henderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240918-039d1e3bebf2231bd452a5ad@orel \
--to=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.