From: Parker Newman <parker@finest.io>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
Parker Newman <pnewman@connecttech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] serial: 8250_exar: Replace custom EEPROM read with eeprom_93cx6
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 11:42:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240920114221.57da8890@SWDEV2.connecttech.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zu2UEAY1jweup6tS@smile.fi.intel.com>
On Fri, 20 Sep 2024 18:26:08 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 10:03:23AM -0400, Parker Newman wrote:
> > From: Parker Newman <pnewman@connecttech.com>
>
> ...
>
> > + osc_freq = le16_to_cpu(ee_words[0]) | (le16_to_cpu(ee_words[1]) << 16);
> > + if (osc_freq == GENMASK(31, 0))
> > return -EIO;
>
> Just noticed that you have
> #define CTI_EE_MASK_OSC_FREQ_LOWER GENMASK(15, 0)
> #define CTI_EE_MASK_OSC_FREQ_UPPER GENMASK(31, 16)
>
> So, please modify them and the above check using these.
> Something like
>
Good catch, I debated using them again with FIELD_PREP() like the
old code but it looked pretty ugly. I guess I missed removing them.
I will fix in v3. In this case should I drop your Reviewed-by tag?
Or is this change small enough to keep it?
> #define CTI_EE_MASK_OSC_FREQ GENMASK(31, 0)
>
> osc_freq = le16_to_cpu(ee_words[0]) | (le16_to_cpu(ee_words[1]) << 16);
> if (osc_freq == CTI_EE_MASK_OSC_FREQ)
> return -EIO;
>
> P.S> If I am not mistaken the definitions were only used in this function.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-20 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-20 14:03 [PATCH v2 0/4] serial: 8250_exar: Replace custom EEPROM code with eeprom_93cx6 Parker Newman
2024-09-20 14:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] misc: eeprom: eeprom_93cx6: Add quirk for extra read clock cycle Parker Newman
2024-09-20 14:45 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-20 15:03 ` Parker Newman
2024-09-20 14:48 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-20 14:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] misc: eeprom: eeprom_93cx6: Switch to BIT() macro Parker Newman
2024-09-20 14:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-20 14:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] serial: 8250_exar: Replace custom EEPROM read with eeprom_93cx6 Parker Newman
2024-09-20 14:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-20 15:09 ` Parker Newman
2024-09-20 15:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-20 15:42 ` Parker Newman [this message]
2024-09-20 15:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-09-20 14:03 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] serial: 8250_exar: Remove old exar_ee_read() and other unneeded code Parker Newman
2024-09-20 14:37 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240920114221.57da8890@SWDEV2.connecttech.local \
--to=parker@finest.io \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pnewman@connecttech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.