From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Allen Pais <apais@linux.microsoft.com>,
Roman Kisel <romank@linux.microsoft.com>,
Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@huawei.com>,
Vijay Nag <nagvijay@microsoft.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coredump: Do not lock during 'comm' reporting
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 14:51:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202409281449.B228D0C1E7@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240928144636.d1964e6c6bb77c3e9123fc64@linux-foundation.org>
On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 02:46:36PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Sep 2024 14:39:45 -0700 Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 28, 2024 at 02:35:32PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Sat, 28 Sep 2024 14:08:31 -0700 Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > The 'comm' member will always be NUL terminated,
> > >
> > > Why is this? I thought this is only true if the caller holds task_lock()?
> >
> > Because it's always written with strscpy_pad(). The final byte will
> > always be NUL. (And this has been true for a very long time.)
>
> So why does __get_task_comm() need to take task_lock()?
That was to make sure we didn't end up with garbled results, but
discussions have determined that we don't care:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240828030321.20688-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com/
But just for safety's sake, I'll change this memcpy to:
memcpy_and_pad(comm, sizeof(comm), current->comm, sizeof(comm) - 1, 0);
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-28 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-28 21:08 [PATCH] coredump: Do not lock during 'comm' reporting Kees Cook
2024-09-28 21:35 ` Andrew Morton
2024-09-28 21:39 ` Kees Cook
2024-09-28 21:46 ` Andrew Morton
2024-09-28 21:51 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2024-09-29 18:42 ` Vegard Nossum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202409281449.B228D0C1E7@keescook \
--to=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apais@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nagvijay@microsoft.com \
--cc=nixiaoming@huawei.com \
--cc=romank@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.