From: "Markku Ahvenjärvi" <mankku@gmail.com>
To: seanjc@google.com
Cc: bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com,
janne.karhunen@gmail.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mankku@gmail.com, mingo@redhat.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, tglx@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] KVM: nVMX: update VPPR on vmlaunch/vmresume
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 15:42:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241002124324.14360-1-mankku@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zu0vvRyCyUaQ2S2a@google.com>
Hi Sean,
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2024, Markku Ahvenjärvi wrote:
> > Running certain hypervisors under KVM on VMX suffered L1 hangs after
> > launching a nested guest. The external interrupts were not processed on
> > vmlaunch/vmresume due to stale VPPR, and L2 guest would resume without
> > allowing L1 hypervisor to process the events.
> >
> > The patch ensures VPPR to be updated when checking for pending
> > interrupts.
>
> This is architecturally incorrect, PPR isn't refreshed at VM-Enter.
I looked into this and found the following from Intel manual:
"30.1.3 PPR Virtualization
The processor performs PPR virtualization in response to the following
operations: (1) VM entry; (2) TPR virtualization; and (3) EOI virtualization.
..."
The section "27.3.2.5 Updating Non-Register State" further explains the VM
enter:
"If the “virtual-interrupt delivery” VM-execution control is 1, VM entry loads
the values of RVI and SVI from the guest interrupt-status field in the VMCS
(see Section 25.4.2). After doing so, the logical processor first causes PPR
virtualization (Section 30.1.3) and then evaluates pending virtual interrupts
(Section 30.2.1). If a virtual interrupt is recognized, it may be delivered in
VMX non-root operation immediately after VM entry (including any specified
event injection) completes; ..."
According to that, PPR is supposed to be refreshed at VM-Enter, or am I
missing something here?
Kind regards,
Markku
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-02 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-20 7:59 [PATCH 0/1] KVM: nVMX: update VPPR on vmlaunch/vmresume Markku Ahvenjärvi
2024-09-20 7:59 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Markku Ahvenjärvi
2024-09-20 8:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-09-20 12:40 ` Markku Ahvenjärvi
2024-10-02 12:42 ` Markku Ahvenjärvi [this message]
2024-10-02 15:52 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-02 16:49 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-02 17:20 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-03 11:29 ` Markku Ahvenjärvi
2024-10-10 11:00 ` Chao Gao
2024-10-14 10:57 ` Markku Ahvenjärvi
2024-10-16 18:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-10-17 13:27 ` Chao Gao
2024-10-17 16:05 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241002124324.14360-1-mankku@gmail.com \
--to=mankku@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=janne.karhunen@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.