From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: enable passthrough command statistics
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 15:00:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241003130053.GE17031@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241002210744.72321-1-kbusch@meta.com>
On Wed, Oct 02, 2024 at 02:07:44PM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> + accounting of the disk. Set to 0 to disable all stats. Set to 1
> + to enable block IO stats. Set to 2 to enable passthrough stats
> + in addition to block IO.
Jens' reply suggest he likes this interface, but I have to say I
already hated it with a passion for the merges - overloading a
previously boolean file with a numberic value is not exactly an
intuitive interface. Is a new sysfs file for this really a problem?
> + if (!bio)
> + return false;
> + if (!bio->bi_bdev)
> + return false;
> + if (blk_rq_bytes(req) & (bdev_logical_block_size(bio->bi_bdev) - 1))
> + return false;
I understand why all these conditions are there, because basically
they'd break the current code to collect stats. But I think this needs
a comment explaining why they are there, and why the statistics are
still useful without the requests matching them.
> + lim = queue_limits_start_update(disk->queue);
> + if (!ios)
> + lim.features &= ~(BLK_FEAT_IO_STAT | BLK_FEAT_PASSTHROUGH_STAT);
> + else if (ios == 2)
> + lim.features |= BLK_FEAT_IO_STAT | BLK_FEAT_PASSTHROUGH_STAT;
> + else if (ios == 1) {
> + lim.features |= BLK_FEAT_IO_STAT;
> + lim.features &= ~BLK_FEAT_PASSTHROUGH_STAT;
BLK_FEAT_IO_STAT is in ->features because drivers need to opt into it,
but BLK_FEAT_PASSTHROUGH_STAT is purely a flag triggered by sysfs and
should go into ->flags.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-03 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-02 21:07 [PATCH] block: enable passthrough command statistics Keith Busch
2024-10-03 1:30 ` Jens Axboe
2024-10-03 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-10-03 13:20 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241003130053.GE17031@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kbusch@meta.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.