From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Gazzillo <paul@pgazz.com>,
Necip Fazil Yildiran <fazilyildiran@gmail.com>,
oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 7/7] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2024 19:07:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202410081902.TwQcmWjk-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241007131620.2090104-8-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
Hi Arnaud,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on 9852d85ec9d492ebef56dc5f229416c925758edc]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Arnaud-Pouliquen/remoteproc-core-Introduce-rproc_pa_to_va-helper/20241007-212358
base: 9852d85ec9d492ebef56dc5f229416c925758edc
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241007131620.2090104-8-arnaud.pouliquen%40foss.st.com
patch subject: [PATCH v10 7/7] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware
config: alpha-kismet-CONFIG_REMOTEPROC_TEE-CONFIG_STM32_RPROC-0-0 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241008/202410081902.TwQcmWjk-lkp@intel.com/config)
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241008/202410081902.TwQcmWjk-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410081902.TwQcmWjk-lkp@intel.com/
kismet warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> kismet: WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for REMOTEPROC_TEE when selected by STM32_RPROC
WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for REMOTEPROC_TEE
Depends on [n]: REMOTEPROC [=y] && OPTEE [=n]
Selected by [y]:
- STM32_RPROC [=y] && (ARCH_STM32 || COMPILE_TEST [=y]) && REMOTEPROC [=y]
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 7/7] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2024 19:07:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202410081902.TwQcmWjk-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241007131620.2090104-8-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1528 bytes --]
Hi Arnaud,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on 9852d85ec9d492ebef56dc5f229416c925758edc]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Arnaud-Pouliquen/remoteproc-core-Introduce-rproc_pa_to_va-helper/20241007-212358
base: 9852d85ec9d492ebef56dc5f229416c925758edc
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241007131620.2090104-8-arnaud.pouliquen%40foss.st.com
patch subject: [PATCH v10 7/7] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware
config: alpha-kismet-CONFIG_REMOTEPROC_TEE-CONFIG_STM32_RPROC-0-0 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241008/202410081902.TwQcmWjk-lkp(a)intel.com/config)
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241008/202410081902.TwQcmWjk-lkp(a)intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410081902.TwQcmWjk-lkp(a)intel.com/
kismet warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> kismet: WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for REMOTEPROC_TEE when selected by STM32_RPROC
WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for REMOTEPROC_TEE
Depends on [n]: REMOTEPROC [=y] && OPTEE [=n]
Selected by [y]:
- STM32_RPROC [=y] && (ARCH_STM32 || COMPILE_TEST [=y]) && REMOTEPROC [=y]
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-08 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-07 13:16 [PATCH v10 0/7] Introduction of a remoteproc tee to load signed firmware Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-10-07 13:16 ` Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-10-07 13:16 ` [PATCH v10 1/7] remoteproc: core: Introduce rproc_pa_to_va helper Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-10-07 13:16 ` Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-10-07 13:16 ` [PATCH v10 2/7] remoteproc: Add TEE support Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-10-07 13:16 ` Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-10-07 13:16 ` [PATCH v10 3/7] remoteproc: core: Refactor resource table cleanup into rproc_release_fw Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-10-07 13:16 ` Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-10-07 13:16 ` [PATCH v10 4/7] remoteproc: Introduce release_fw optional operation Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-10-07 13:16 ` Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-10-07 13:16 ` [PATCH v10 5/7] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add compatibility for TEE support Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-10-07 13:16 ` Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-10-07 13:16 ` [PATCH v10 6/7] remoteproc: stm32: Create sub-functions to request shutdown and release Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-10-07 13:16 ` Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-10-07 13:16 ` [PATCH v10 7/7] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-10-07 13:16 ` Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-10-08 9:55 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-08 9:55 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-08 11:07 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-10-08 11:07 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-08 14:23 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-10-08 14:23 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-10-08 18:27 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-08 18:27 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202410081902.TwQcmWjk-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=fazilyildiran@gmail.com \
--cc=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org \
--cc=paul@pgazz.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.