From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@shopee.com>,
jack@suse.cz, hch@infradead.org, willy@infradead.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, chandan.babu@oracle.com
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Tang Yizhou <yizhou.tang@shopee.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] xfs: Let the max iomap length be consistent with the writeback code
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 15:24:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202410091559.uWiy0Oj0-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241006152849.247152-4-yizhou.tang@shopee.com>
Hi Tang,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
[also build test ERROR on brauner-vfs/vfs.all xfs-linux/for-next linus/master v6.12-rc2 next-20241008]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Tang-Yizhou/mm-page-writeback-c-Rename-BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL-to-BW_DIRTYLIMIT_INTERVAL/20241006-225445
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241006152849.247152-4-yizhou.tang%40shopee.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] xfs: Let the max iomap length be consistent with the writeback code
config: x86_64-kexec (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241009/202410091559.uWiy0Oj0-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 18.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 3b5b5c1ec4a3095ab096dd780e84d7ab81f3d7ff)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241009/202410091559.uWiy0Oj0-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410091559.uWiy0Oj0-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c:768:7: error: call to undeclared function 'inode_to_wb'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
768 | wb = inode_to_wb(wb);
| ^
>> fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c:768:5: error: incompatible integer to pointer conversion assigning to 'struct bdi_writeback *' from 'int' [-Wint-conversion]
768 | wb = inode_to_wb(wb);
| ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2 errors generated.
vim +/inode_to_wb +768 fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
748
749 /*
750 * We cap the maximum length we map to a sane size to keep the chunks
751 * of work done where somewhat symmetric with the work writeback does.
752 * This is a completely arbitrary number pulled out of thin air as a
753 * best guess for initial testing.
754 *
755 * Following the logic of writeback_chunk_size(), the length will be
756 * rounded to the nearest 4MB boundary.
757 *
758 * Note that the values needs to be less than 32-bits wide until the
759 * lower level functions are updated.
760 */
761 static loff_t
762 xfs_max_map_length(struct inode *inode, loff_t length)
763 {
764 struct bdi_writeback *wb;
765 long pages;
766
767 spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> 768 wb = inode_to_wb(wb);
769 pages = min(wb->avg_write_bandwidth / 2,
770 global_wb_domain.dirty_limit / DIRTY_SCOPE);
771 spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
772 pages = round_down(pages + MIN_WRITEBACK_PAGES, MIN_WRITEBACK_PAGES);
773
774 return min_t(loff_t, length, pages * PAGE_SIZE);
775 }
776
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-09 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-06 15:28 [PATCH v2 0/3] Cleanup some writeback codes Tang Yizhou
2024-10-06 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm/page-writeback.c: Rename BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL to BW_DIRTYLIMIT_INTERVAL Tang Yizhou
2024-10-06 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mm/page-writeback.c: Fix comment of wb_domain_writeout_add() Tang Yizhou
2024-10-06 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] xfs: Let the max iomap length be consistent with the writeback code Tang Yizhou
2024-10-06 16:30 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-07 5:36 ` Tang Yizhou
2024-10-07 16:36 ` Jan Kara
2024-10-07 17:52 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-07 21:36 ` Dave Chinner
2024-10-08 6:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-09 7:24 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-10-09 8:26 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202410091559.uWiy0Oj0-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chandan.babu@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yizhou.tang@shopee.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.