From: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org (open list:GENERIC PHY FRAMEWORK),
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated
list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support),
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org (open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC
support), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Cc: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/6] phy: rockchip-pcie: Use devm_clk_get_enabled() helper
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 12:49:04 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241012071919.3726-3-linux.amoon@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241012071919.3726-1-linux.amoon@gmail.com>
Use devm_clk_get_enabled() instead of devm_clk_get() to make the code
cleaner and avoid calling clk_disable_unprepare(), as this is exactly
what this function does. Use the dev_err_probe() helper to simplify
error handling during probe.
Refactor the mutex handling in the rockchip_pcie_phy_init() function
to improve code readability and maintainability. The goto statement has
been removed, and the mutex_unlock call is now directly within the
conditional block.
Return the result of reset_control_assert() function, with 0 indicating
success and an error code indicating failure
Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
---
v3:
Dan Carpenter: Reported below warning.
smatch warnings:
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c:278 rockchip_pcie_phy_init() warn: missing error code 'err'
So refactor the mutex_lock/mutex_unlock and return the err code.
v2: Change the subject drop: Change to use/Use
v1: New patch in this series
---
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c | 34 +++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
index 51e636a1ce33..b5b1b1a667b2 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
@@ -274,30 +274,19 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
mutex_lock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
- if (rk_phy->init_cnt++)
- goto err_out;
-
- err = clk_prepare_enable(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref);
- if (err) {
- dev_err(&phy->dev, "Fail to enable pcie ref clock.\n");
- goto err_refclk;
+ if (rk_phy->init_cnt++) {
+ mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
+ return 0;
}
err = reset_control_assert(rk_phy->phy_rst);
if (err) {
dev_err(&phy->dev, "assert phy_rst err %d\n", err);
- goto err_reset;
+ rk_phy->init_cnt--;
+ mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
+ return err;
}
-err_out:
- mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
- return 0;
-
-err_reset:
-
- clk_disable_unprepare(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref);
-err_refclk:
- rk_phy->init_cnt--;
mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
return err;
}
@@ -312,8 +301,6 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_exit(struct phy *phy)
if (--rk_phy->init_cnt)
goto err_init_cnt;
- clk_disable_unprepare(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref);
-
err_init_cnt:
mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
return 0;
@@ -375,11 +362,10 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(rk_phy->phy_rst),
"missing phy property for reset controller\n");
- rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref = devm_clk_get(dev, "refclk");
- if (IS_ERR(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref)) {
- dev_err(dev, "refclk not found.\n");
- return PTR_ERR(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref);
- }
+ rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, "refclk");
+ if (IS_ERR(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref))
+ return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref),
+ "failed to get phyclk\n");
/* parse #phy-cells to see if it's legacy PHY model */
if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "#phy-cells", &phy_num))
--
2.44.0
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org (open list:GENERIC PHY FRAMEWORK),
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated
list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support),
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org (open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC
support), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Cc: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/6] phy: rockchip-pcie: Use devm_clk_get_enabled() helper
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 12:49:04 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241012071919.3726-3-linux.amoon@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241012071919.3726-1-linux.amoon@gmail.com>
Use devm_clk_get_enabled() instead of devm_clk_get() to make the code
cleaner and avoid calling clk_disable_unprepare(), as this is exactly
what this function does. Use the dev_err_probe() helper to simplify
error handling during probe.
Refactor the mutex handling in the rockchip_pcie_phy_init() function
to improve code readability and maintainability. The goto statement has
been removed, and the mutex_unlock call is now directly within the
conditional block.
Return the result of reset_control_assert() function, with 0 indicating
success and an error code indicating failure
Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
---
v3:
Dan Carpenter: Reported below warning.
smatch warnings:
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c:278 rockchip_pcie_phy_init() warn: missing error code 'err'
So refactor the mutex_lock/mutex_unlock and return the err code.
v2: Change the subject drop: Change to use/Use
v1: New patch in this series
---
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c | 34 +++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
index 51e636a1ce33..b5b1b1a667b2 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
@@ -274,30 +274,19 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
mutex_lock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
- if (rk_phy->init_cnt++)
- goto err_out;
-
- err = clk_prepare_enable(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref);
- if (err) {
- dev_err(&phy->dev, "Fail to enable pcie ref clock.\n");
- goto err_refclk;
+ if (rk_phy->init_cnt++) {
+ mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
+ return 0;
}
err = reset_control_assert(rk_phy->phy_rst);
if (err) {
dev_err(&phy->dev, "assert phy_rst err %d\n", err);
- goto err_reset;
+ rk_phy->init_cnt--;
+ mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
+ return err;
}
-err_out:
- mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
- return 0;
-
-err_reset:
-
- clk_disable_unprepare(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref);
-err_refclk:
- rk_phy->init_cnt--;
mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
return err;
}
@@ -312,8 +301,6 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_exit(struct phy *phy)
if (--rk_phy->init_cnt)
goto err_init_cnt;
- clk_disable_unprepare(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref);
-
err_init_cnt:
mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
return 0;
@@ -375,11 +362,10 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(rk_phy->phy_rst),
"missing phy property for reset controller\n");
- rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref = devm_clk_get(dev, "refclk");
- if (IS_ERR(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref)) {
- dev_err(dev, "refclk not found.\n");
- return PTR_ERR(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref);
- }
+ rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, "refclk");
+ if (IS_ERR(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref))
+ return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref),
+ "failed to get phyclk\n");
/* parse #phy-cells to see if it's legacy PHY model */
if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "#phy-cells", &phy_num))
--
2.44.0
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org (open list:GENERIC PHY FRAMEWORK),
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated
list:ARM/Rockchip SoC support),
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org (open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC
support), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Cc: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/6] phy: rockchip-pcie: Use devm_clk_get_enabled() helper
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 12:49:04 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241012071919.3726-3-linux.amoon@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241012071919.3726-1-linux.amoon@gmail.com>
Use devm_clk_get_enabled() instead of devm_clk_get() to make the code
cleaner and avoid calling clk_disable_unprepare(), as this is exactly
what this function does. Use the dev_err_probe() helper to simplify
error handling during probe.
Refactor the mutex handling in the rockchip_pcie_phy_init() function
to improve code readability and maintainability. The goto statement has
been removed, and the mutex_unlock call is now directly within the
conditional block.
Return the result of reset_control_assert() function, with 0 indicating
success and an error code indicating failure
Signed-off-by: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@gmail.com>
---
v3:
Dan Carpenter: Reported below warning.
smatch warnings:
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c:278 rockchip_pcie_phy_init() warn: missing error code 'err'
So refactor the mutex_lock/mutex_unlock and return the err code.
v2: Change the subject drop: Change to use/Use
v1: New patch in this series
---
drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c | 34 +++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
index 51e636a1ce33..b5b1b1a667b2 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
@@ -274,30 +274,19 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
mutex_lock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
- if (rk_phy->init_cnt++)
- goto err_out;
-
- err = clk_prepare_enable(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref);
- if (err) {
- dev_err(&phy->dev, "Fail to enable pcie ref clock.\n");
- goto err_refclk;
+ if (rk_phy->init_cnt++) {
+ mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
+ return 0;
}
err = reset_control_assert(rk_phy->phy_rst);
if (err) {
dev_err(&phy->dev, "assert phy_rst err %d\n", err);
- goto err_reset;
+ rk_phy->init_cnt--;
+ mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
+ return err;
}
-err_out:
- mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
- return 0;
-
-err_reset:
-
- clk_disable_unprepare(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref);
-err_refclk:
- rk_phy->init_cnt--;
mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
return err;
}
@@ -312,8 +301,6 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_exit(struct phy *phy)
if (--rk_phy->init_cnt)
goto err_init_cnt;
- clk_disable_unprepare(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref);
-
err_init_cnt:
mutex_unlock(&rk_phy->pcie_mutex);
return 0;
@@ -375,11 +362,10 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(rk_phy->phy_rst),
"missing phy property for reset controller\n");
- rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref = devm_clk_get(dev, "refclk");
- if (IS_ERR(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref)) {
- dev_err(dev, "refclk not found.\n");
- return PTR_ERR(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref);
- }
+ rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref = devm_clk_get_enabled(dev, "refclk");
+ if (IS_ERR(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref))
+ return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(rk_phy->clk_pciephy_ref),
+ "failed to get phyclk\n");
/* parse #phy-cells to see if it's legacy PHY model */
if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "#phy-cells", &phy_num))
--
2.44.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-12 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-12 7:19 [PATCH v3 0/6] RK3399: PCie Phy using new helper function Anand Moon
2024-10-12 7:19 ` Anand Moon
2024-10-12 7:19 ` Anand Moon
2024-10-12 7:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] phy: rockchip-pcie: Simplify error handling with dev_err_probe() Anand Moon
2024-10-12 7:19 ` Anand Moon
2024-10-12 7:19 ` Anand Moon
2024-10-12 7:19 ` Anand Moon [this message]
2024-10-12 7:19 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] phy: rockchip-pcie: Use devm_clk_get_enabled() helper Anand Moon
2024-10-12 7:19 ` Anand Moon
2024-10-12 7:19 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] phy: rockchip-pcie: Use regmap_read_poll_timeout() for PCIe reference clk PLL status Anand Moon
2024-10-12 7:19 ` Anand Moon
2024-10-12 7:19 ` Anand Moon
2024-10-12 7:19 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] phy: rockchip-pcie: Refactor mutex handling in rockchip_pcie_phy_power_off() Anand Moon
2024-10-12 7:19 ` Anand Moon
2024-10-12 7:19 ` Anand Moon
2024-10-12 7:19 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] phy: rockchip-pcie: Refactor mutex handling in rockchip_pcie_phy_power_on() Anand Moon
2024-10-12 7:19 ` Anand Moon
2024-10-12 7:19 ` Anand Moon
2024-10-12 7:19 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] phy: rockchip-pcie: Use guard notation when acquiring mutex Anand Moon
2024-10-12 7:19 ` Anand Moon
2024-10-12 7:19 ` Anand Moon
2024-12-02 16:01 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] RK3399: PCie Phy using new helper function Anand Moon
2024-12-02 16:01 ` Anand Moon
2024-12-02 16:01 ` Anand Moon
2024-12-08 17:02 ` Vinod Koul
2024-12-08 17:02 ` Vinod Koul
2024-12-08 17:02 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241012071919.3726-3-linux.amoon@gmail.com \
--to=linux.amoon@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.