All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org, "Jerin Jacob" <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	"Aman Singh" <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>,
	"Konstantin Ananyev" <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] net: add smaller IPv4 cksum function for simple cases
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 12:34:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241017123454.302a7203@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZxFfcRh9pgkTYVfH@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 20:03:13 +0100
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 07:15:10PM +0200, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > +/**
> > > + * Process the IPv4 checksum of an IPv4 header without any extensions.
> > > + *
> > > + * The checksum field does NOT have to be set by the caller, the field
> > > + * is skipped by the calculation.
> > > + *
> > > + * @param ipv4_hdr
> > > + *   The pointer to the contiguous IPv4 header.
> > > + * @return
> > > + *   The complemented checksum to set in the IP packet.
> > > + */
> > > +__rte_experimental
> > > +static inline uint16_t
> > > +rte_ipv4_cksum_simple(const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr)
> > > +{
> > > +	const uint16_t *v16_h;
> > > +	uint32_t ip_cksum;
> > > +
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * Compute the sum of successive 16-bit words of the IPv4 header,
> > > +	 * skipping the checksum field of the header.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	v16_h = (const unaligned_uint16_t *)&ipv4_hdr->version_ihl;
> > > +	ip_cksum = v16_h[0] + v16_h[1] + v16_h[2] + v16_h[3] +
> > > +		v16_h[4] + v16_h[6] + v16_h[7] + v16_h[8] + v16_h[9];
> > > +
> > > +	/* reduce 32 bit checksum to 16 bits and complement it */
> > > +	ip_cksum = (ip_cksum & 0xffff) + (ip_cksum >> 16);
> > > +	ip_cksum = (ip_cksum & 0xffff) + (ip_cksum >> 16);
> > > +	ip_cksum = (~ip_cksum) & 0x0000FFFF;
> > > +	return (ip_cksum == 0) ? 0xFFFF : (uint16_t) ip_cksum;  
> > 
> > The zero exception does not apply to the checksum stored in the IP header, only to the checksum in the UDP header.
> >   
> 
> I was wondering about that, because I didn't see it mentioned anywhere in
> the RFCs I consulted, but on the other hand all the implementations in the
> code seemed to have the check for zero.
> 
> > > +}  
> > 
> > Besides that, for the series,  
> 
> So, just to confirm, the zero check at the end of the new ip_cksum_simple
> function should be removed and we always return the computed value
> directly?

Depends on usage.
  - if the computed value is zero, then 0xffff should be placed in
    the IP header.
  - often code use ip checksum code to see if incoming checksum is good.
    in that case zero means the checksum is valid.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-17 19:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-17 14:22 [PATCH 0/6] Reduce scope address-of-packed-member warning Bruce Richardson
2024-10-17 14:22 ` [PATCH 1/6] ip_frag: remove use of unaligned variable Bruce Richardson
2024-10-17 16:26   ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-17 16:42   ` Konstantin Ananyev
2024-10-17 14:22 ` [PATCH 2/6] efd: remove unnecessary packed attributes Bruce Richardson
2024-10-17 16:22   ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-17 14:22 ` [PATCH 3/6] bus/ifpga: remove packed attribute Bruce Richardson
2024-10-17 14:52   ` Xu, Rosen
2024-10-17 16:25   ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-17 14:22 ` [PATCH 4/6] pipeline: " Bruce Richardson
2024-10-17 14:24   ` Bruce Richardson
2024-10-17 16:25   ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-17 14:22 ` [PATCH 5/6] net: add smaller IPv4 cksum function for simple cases Bruce Richardson
2024-10-17 16:24   ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-17 17:01     ` Bruce Richardson
2024-10-17 17:15   ` Morten Brørup
2024-10-17 19:03     ` Bruce Richardson
2024-10-17 19:34       ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2024-10-18  0:32         ` Morten Brørup
2024-10-17 14:22 ` [PATCH 6/6] build: limit scope of packed member warning disabling Bruce Richardson
2024-10-19 15:38   ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-17 16:21 ` [PATCH 0/6] Reduce scope address-of-packed-member warning Stephen Hemminger
2024-10-17 17:02   ` Bruce Richardson
2024-10-25 13:24 ` David Marchand
2024-10-25 14:55   ` David Marchand
2024-10-25 16:51     ` Bruce Richardson
2024-10-25 16:50 ` [PATCH v2 " Bruce Richardson
2024-10-25 16:50   ` [PATCH v2 1/6] ip_frag: remove use of unaligned variable Bruce Richardson
2024-10-25 16:50   ` [PATCH v2 2/6] efd: remove unnecessary packed attributes Bruce Richardson
2024-10-25 16:50   ` [PATCH v2 3/6] bus/ifpga: remove packed attribute Bruce Richardson
2024-10-25 16:50   ` [PATCH v2 4/6] pipeline: " Bruce Richardson
2024-10-25 16:50   ` [PATCH v2 5/6] net: add smaller IPv4 cksum function for simple cases Bruce Richardson
2024-10-30 11:21     ` David Marchand
2024-10-30 11:27       ` Bruce Richardson
2024-10-30 11:32         ` Morten Brørup
2024-10-30 12:28           ` Bruce Richardson
2024-10-30 12:33             ` Morten Brørup
2024-10-30 14:08           ` David Marchand
2024-10-30 14:45             ` Bruce Richardson
2024-10-25 16:50   ` [PATCH v2 6/6] build: limit scope of packed member warning disabling Bruce Richardson
2024-10-28 12:51   ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Reduce scope address-of-packed-member warning fengchengwen
2024-10-30  8:22   ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241017123454.302a7203@hermes.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru \
    --cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.