* [PATCH v4 1/5] maple_tree: print empty for an empty tree on mt_dump()
2024-10-19 2:37 [PATCH v4 0/5] refine storing NULL Wei Yang
@ 2024-10-19 2:37 ` Wei Yang
2024-10-29 15:23 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-10-19 2:37 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] maple_tree: the return value of mas_root_expand() is not used Wei Yang
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yang @ 2024-10-19 2:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm, Liam.Howlett
Cc: maple-tree, linux-mm, Wei Yang, Liam R . Howlett, Sidhartha Kumar,
Lorenzo Stoakes
Currently for an empty tree, it would print:
maple_tree(0x7ffcd02c6ee0) flags 1, height 0 root (nil)
0: (nil)
This is a little misleading.
Let's print (empty) for an empty tree.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
CC: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
CC: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
CC: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
---
lib/maple_tree.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/maple_tree.c b/lib/maple_tree.c
index 3619301dda2e..21e6895b7aef 100644
--- a/lib/maple_tree.c
+++ b/lib/maple_tree.c
@@ -7287,10 +7287,12 @@ void mt_dump(const struct maple_tree *mt, enum mt_dump_format format)
pr_info("maple_tree(%p) flags %X, height %u root %p\n",
mt, mt->ma_flags, mt_height(mt), entry);
- if (!xa_is_node(entry))
- mt_dump_entry(entry, 0, 0, 0, format);
- else if (entry)
+ if (xa_is_node(entry))
mt_dump_node(mt, entry, 0, mt_node_max(entry), 0, format);
+ else if (entry)
+ mt_dump_entry(entry, 0, 0, 0, format);
+ else
+ pr_info("(empty)\n");
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mt_dump);
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] maple_tree: print empty for an empty tree on mt_dump()
2024-10-19 2:37 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] maple_tree: print empty for an empty tree on mt_dump() Wei Yang
@ 2024-10-29 15:23 ` Liam R. Howlett
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Liam R. Howlett @ 2024-10-29 15:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Yang; +Cc: akpm, maple-tree, linux-mm, Sidhartha Kumar, Lorenzo Stoakes
* Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> [241018 22:37]:
> Currently for an empty tree, it would print:
>
> maple_tree(0x7ffcd02c6ee0) flags 1, height 0 root (nil)
> 0: (nil)
>
> This is a little misleading.
>
> Let's print (empty) for an empty tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
> CC: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
> CC: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
> CC: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
> ---
> lib/maple_tree.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/maple_tree.c b/lib/maple_tree.c
> index 3619301dda2e..21e6895b7aef 100644
> --- a/lib/maple_tree.c
> +++ b/lib/maple_tree.c
> @@ -7287,10 +7287,12 @@ void mt_dump(const struct maple_tree *mt, enum mt_dump_format format)
>
> pr_info("maple_tree(%p) flags %X, height %u root %p\n",
> mt, mt->ma_flags, mt_height(mt), entry);
> - if (!xa_is_node(entry))
> - mt_dump_entry(entry, 0, 0, 0, format);
> - else if (entry)
> + if (xa_is_node(entry))
> mt_dump_node(mt, entry, 0, mt_node_max(entry), 0, format);
> + else if (entry)
> + mt_dump_entry(entry, 0, 0, 0, format);
> + else
> + pr_info("(empty)\n");
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mt_dump);
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 2/5] maple_tree: the return value of mas_root_expand() is not used
2024-10-19 2:37 [PATCH v4 0/5] refine storing NULL Wei Yang
2024-10-19 2:37 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] maple_tree: print empty for an empty tree on mt_dump() Wei Yang
@ 2024-10-19 2:37 ` Wei Yang
2024-10-29 15:23 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-10-19 2:37 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] maple_tree: not necessary to check index/last again Wei Yang
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yang @ 2024-10-19 2:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm, Liam.Howlett
Cc: maple-tree, linux-mm, Wei Yang, Liam R . Howlett, Sidhartha Kumar,
Lorenzo Stoakes
No user of the return value now, just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
CC: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
CC: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
CC: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
---
lib/maple_tree.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/maple_tree.c b/lib/maple_tree.c
index 21e6895b7aef..517ddf2950e6 100644
--- a/lib/maple_tree.c
+++ b/lib/maple_tree.c
@@ -3400,7 +3400,7 @@ static noinline_for_kasan void mas_commit_b_node(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas,
* @mas: The maple state
* @entry: The entry to store into the tree
*/
-static inline int mas_root_expand(struct ma_state *mas, void *entry)
+static inline void mas_root_expand(struct ma_state *mas, void *entry)
{
void *contents = mas_root_locked(mas);
enum maple_type type = maple_leaf_64;
@@ -3436,7 +3436,7 @@ static inline int mas_root_expand(struct ma_state *mas, void *entry)
ma_set_meta(node, maple_leaf_64, 0, slot);
/* swap the new root into the tree */
rcu_assign_pointer(mas->tree->ma_root, mte_mk_root(mas->node));
- return slot;
+ return;
}
static inline void mas_store_root(struct ma_state *mas, void *entry)
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] maple_tree: the return value of mas_root_expand() is not used
2024-10-19 2:37 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] maple_tree: the return value of mas_root_expand() is not used Wei Yang
@ 2024-10-29 15:23 ` Liam R. Howlett
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Liam R. Howlett @ 2024-10-29 15:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Yang; +Cc: akpm, maple-tree, linux-mm, Sidhartha Kumar, Lorenzo Stoakes
* Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> [241018 22:37]:
> No user of the return value now, just remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
> CC: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
> CC: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
> CC: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
> ---
> lib/maple_tree.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/maple_tree.c b/lib/maple_tree.c
> index 21e6895b7aef..517ddf2950e6 100644
> --- a/lib/maple_tree.c
> +++ b/lib/maple_tree.c
> @@ -3400,7 +3400,7 @@ static noinline_for_kasan void mas_commit_b_node(struct ma_wr_state *wr_mas,
> * @mas: The maple state
> * @entry: The entry to store into the tree
> */
> -static inline int mas_root_expand(struct ma_state *mas, void *entry)
> +static inline void mas_root_expand(struct ma_state *mas, void *entry)
> {
> void *contents = mas_root_locked(mas);
> enum maple_type type = maple_leaf_64;
> @@ -3436,7 +3436,7 @@ static inline int mas_root_expand(struct ma_state *mas, void *entry)
> ma_set_meta(node, maple_leaf_64, 0, slot);
> /* swap the new root into the tree */
> rcu_assign_pointer(mas->tree->ma_root, mte_mk_root(mas->node));
> - return slot;
> + return;
> }
>
> static inline void mas_store_root(struct ma_state *mas, void *entry)
> --
> 2.34.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 3/5] maple_tree: not necessary to check index/last again
2024-10-19 2:37 [PATCH v4 0/5] refine storing NULL Wei Yang
2024-10-19 2:37 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] maple_tree: print empty for an empty tree on mt_dump() Wei Yang
2024-10-19 2:37 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] maple_tree: the return value of mas_root_expand() is not used Wei Yang
@ 2024-10-19 2:37 ` Wei Yang
2024-10-29 15:23 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-10-19 2:37 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] maple_tree: refine mas_store_root() on storing NULL Wei Yang
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yang @ 2024-10-19 2:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm, Liam.Howlett
Cc: maple-tree, linux-mm, Wei Yang, Liam R . Howlett, Sidhartha Kumar,
Lorenzo Stoakes
Before calling mas_new_root(), the range has been checked.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
CC: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
CC: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
CC: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
---
v4: add WARN_ON_ONCE() to check mis-usage.
---
lib/maple_tree.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/maple_tree.c b/lib/maple_tree.c
index 517ddf2950e6..2226e77c00cb 100644
--- a/lib/maple_tree.c
+++ b/lib/maple_tree.c
@@ -3662,7 +3662,9 @@ static inline void mas_new_root(struct ma_state *mas, void *entry)
void __rcu **slots;
unsigned long *pivots;
- if (!entry && !mas->index && mas->last == ULONG_MAX) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(mas->index || mas->last != ULONG_MAX);
+
+ if (!entry) {
mas->depth = 0;
mas_set_height(mas);
rcu_assign_pointer(mas->tree->ma_root, entry);
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] maple_tree: not necessary to check index/last again
2024-10-19 2:37 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] maple_tree: not necessary to check index/last again Wei Yang
@ 2024-10-29 15:23 ` Liam R. Howlett
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Liam R. Howlett @ 2024-10-29 15:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Yang; +Cc: akpm, maple-tree, linux-mm, Sidhartha Kumar, Lorenzo Stoakes
* Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> [241018 22:37]:
> Before calling mas_new_root(), the range has been checked.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
> CC: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
> CC: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
> CC: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
>
Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
> ---
> v4: add WARN_ON_ONCE() to check mis-usage.
> ---
> lib/maple_tree.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/maple_tree.c b/lib/maple_tree.c
> index 517ddf2950e6..2226e77c00cb 100644
> --- a/lib/maple_tree.c
> +++ b/lib/maple_tree.c
> @@ -3662,7 +3662,9 @@ static inline void mas_new_root(struct ma_state *mas, void *entry)
> void __rcu **slots;
> unsigned long *pivots;
>
> - if (!entry && !mas->index && mas->last == ULONG_MAX) {
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(mas->index || mas->last != ULONG_MAX);
> +
> + if (!entry) {
> mas->depth = 0;
> mas_set_height(mas);
> rcu_assign_pointer(mas->tree->ma_root, entry);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 4/5] maple_tree: refine mas_store_root() on storing NULL
2024-10-19 2:37 [PATCH v4 0/5] refine storing NULL Wei Yang
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-19 2:37 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] maple_tree: not necessary to check index/last again Wei Yang
@ 2024-10-19 2:37 ` Wei Yang
2024-10-29 15:24 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-10-19 2:37 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] maple_tree: add a test checking storing null Wei Yang
2024-10-19 2:42 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] refine storing NULL Wei Yang
5 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yang @ 2024-10-19 2:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm, Liam.Howlett
Cc: maple-tree, linux-mm, Wei Yang, Liam R . Howlett, Sidhartha Kumar,
Lorenzo Stoakes
Currently, when storing NULL on mas_store_root(), the behavior could be
improved.
For example possible cases are:
* store NULL at any range result a new node
* store NULL at range [m, n] where m > 0 to a single entry tree result
a new node with range [m, n] set to NULL
* store NULL at range [m, n] where m > 0 to an empty tree result
consecutive NULL slot
* it allows for multiple NULL entries by expanding root to
store NULLs to an empty tree
This patch tries to improve in:
* memory efficient by setting to empty tree instead of using a node
* remove the possibility of consecutive NULL slot which will prohibit
extended null in later operation
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
CC: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
CC: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
CC: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
---
v3: move change into mas_store_root()
v4: add a comment and simplify the logic a little
adjust the change log a little
---
lib/maple_tree.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/maple_tree.c b/lib/maple_tree.c
index 2226e77c00cb..1205a5208cfe 100644
--- a/lib/maple_tree.c
+++ b/lib/maple_tree.c
@@ -3439,9 +3439,20 @@ static inline void mas_root_expand(struct ma_state *mas, void *entry)
return;
}
+/*
+ * mas_store_root() - Storing value into root.
+ * @mas: The maple state
+ * @entry: The entry to store.
+ *
+ * There is no root node now and we are storing a value into the root - this
+ * function either assigns the pointer or expands into a node.
+ */
static inline void mas_store_root(struct ma_state *mas, void *entry)
{
- if (likely((mas->last != 0) || (mas->index != 0)))
+ if (!entry) {
+ if (!mas->index)
+ rcu_assign_pointer(mas->tree->ma_root, NULL);
+ } else if (likely((mas->last != 0) || (mas->index != 0)))
mas_root_expand(mas, entry);
else if (((unsigned long) (entry) & 3) == 2)
mas_root_expand(mas, entry);
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] maple_tree: refine mas_store_root() on storing NULL
2024-10-19 2:37 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] maple_tree: refine mas_store_root() on storing NULL Wei Yang
@ 2024-10-29 15:24 ` Liam R. Howlett
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Liam R. Howlett @ 2024-10-29 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Yang; +Cc: akpm, maple-tree, linux-mm, Sidhartha Kumar, Lorenzo Stoakes
* Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> [241018 22:37]:
> Currently, when storing NULL on mas_store_root(), the behavior could be
> improved.
>
> For example possible cases are:
>
> * store NULL at any range result a new node
> * store NULL at range [m, n] where m > 0 to a single entry tree result
> a new node with range [m, n] set to NULL
> * store NULL at range [m, n] where m > 0 to an empty tree result
> consecutive NULL slot
> * it allows for multiple NULL entries by expanding root to
> store NULLs to an empty tree
>
> This patch tries to improve in:
>
> * memory efficient by setting to empty tree instead of using a node
> * remove the possibility of consecutive NULL slot which will prohibit
> extended null in later operation
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
> CC: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
> CC: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
> CC: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
>
> ---
> v3: move change into mas_store_root()
> v4: add a comment and simplify the logic a little
> adjust the change log a little
> ---
> lib/maple_tree.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/maple_tree.c b/lib/maple_tree.c
> index 2226e77c00cb..1205a5208cfe 100644
> --- a/lib/maple_tree.c
> +++ b/lib/maple_tree.c
> @@ -3439,9 +3439,20 @@ static inline void mas_root_expand(struct ma_state *mas, void *entry)
> return;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * mas_store_root() - Storing value into root.
> + * @mas: The maple state
> + * @entry: The entry to store.
> + *
> + * There is no root node now and we are storing a value into the root - this
> + * function either assigns the pointer or expands into a node.
> + */
> static inline void mas_store_root(struct ma_state *mas, void *entry)
> {
> - if (likely((mas->last != 0) || (mas->index != 0)))
> + if (!entry) {
> + if (!mas->index)
> + rcu_assign_pointer(mas->tree->ma_root, NULL);
> + } else if (likely((mas->last != 0) || (mas->index != 0)))
> mas_root_expand(mas, entry);
> else if (((unsigned long) (entry) & 3) == 2)
> mas_root_expand(mas, entry);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 5/5] maple_tree: add a test checking storing null
2024-10-19 2:37 [PATCH v4 0/5] refine storing NULL Wei Yang
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-19 2:37 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] maple_tree: refine mas_store_root() on storing NULL Wei Yang
@ 2024-10-19 2:37 ` Wei Yang
2024-10-22 17:37 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-29 15:17 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-10-19 2:42 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] refine storing NULL Wei Yang
5 siblings, 2 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yang @ 2024-10-19 2:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm, Liam.Howlett
Cc: maple-tree, linux-mm, Wei Yang, Liam R . Howlett, Sidhartha Kumar,
Lorenzo Stoakes
Add a test to assert that, when storing null to am empty tree or a
single entry tree it will not result into:
* a root node with range [0, ULONG_MAX] set to NULL
* a root node with consecutive slot set to NULL
Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
CC: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
CC: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
CC: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
---
v3: move test into lib/test_maple_tree.c
---
lib/test_maple_tree.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 90 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/test_maple_tree.c b/lib/test_maple_tree.c
index 31561e0e1a0d..2ef72f6c6d1b 100644
--- a/lib/test_maple_tree.c
+++ b/lib/test_maple_tree.c
@@ -1387,6 +1387,92 @@ static noinline void __init check_prev_entry(struct maple_tree *mt)
mas_unlock(&mas);
}
+static noinline void __init check_store_null(struct maple_tree *mt)
+{
+ MA_STATE(mas, mt, 0, ULONG_MAX);
+
+ /*
+ * Store NULL at range [0, ULONG_MAX] to an empty tree should result
+ * in an empty tree
+ */
+ mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
+ mas_lock(&mas);
+ mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
+ MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
+ mas_unlock(&mas);
+ mtree_destroy(mt);
+
+ /*
+ * Store NULL at any range to an empty tree should result in an empty
+ * tree
+ */
+ mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
+ mas_lock(&mas);
+ mas_set_range(&mas, 3, 10);
+ mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
+ MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
+ mas_unlock(&mas);
+ mtree_destroy(mt);
+
+ /*
+ * Store NULL at range [0, ULONG_MAX] to a single entry tree should
+ * result in an empty tree
+ */
+ mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
+ mas_lock(&mas);
+ mas_set(&mas, 0);
+ mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
+ mas_set_range(&mas, 0, ULONG_MAX);
+ mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
+ MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
+ mas_unlock(&mas);
+ mtree_destroy(mt);
+
+ /*
+ * Store NULL at range [0, n] to a single entry tree should
+ * result in an empty tree
+ */
+ mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
+ mas_lock(&mas);
+ mas_set(&mas, 0);
+ mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
+ mas_set_range(&mas, 0, 5);
+ mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
+ MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
+ mas_unlock(&mas);
+ mtree_destroy(mt);
+
+ /*
+ * Store NULL at range [m, n] where m > 0 to a single entry tree
+ * should still be a single entry tree
+ */
+ mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
+ mas_lock(&mas);
+ mas_set(&mas, 0);
+ mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
+ mas_set_range(&mas, 2, 5);
+ mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
+ MT_BUG_ON(mt, mtree_empty(mt));
+ MT_BUG_ON(mt, xa_is_node(mt->ma_root));
+ mas_unlock(&mas);
+ mtree_destroy(mt);
+
+ /*
+ * Store NULL at range [0, ULONG_MAX] to a tree with node should
+ * result in an empty tree
+ */
+ mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
+ mas_lock(&mas);
+ mas_set_range(&mas, 1, 3);
+ mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
+ MT_BUG_ON(mt, !xa_is_node(mt->ma_root));
+ mas_set_range(&mas, 0, ULONG_MAX);
+ mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
+ MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
+ mas_unlock(&mas);
+ mtree_destroy(mt);
+}
+
static noinline void __init check_root_expand(struct maple_tree *mt)
{
MA_STATE(mas, mt, 0, 0);
@@ -3710,6 +3796,10 @@ static int __init maple_tree_seed(void)
goto skip;
#endif
+ mt_init_flags(&tree, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
+ check_store_null(&tree);
+ mtree_destroy(&tree);
+
mt_init_flags(&tree, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
check_root_expand(&tree);
mtree_destroy(&tree);
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] maple_tree: add a test checking storing null
2024-10-19 2:37 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] maple_tree: add a test checking storing null Wei Yang
@ 2024-10-22 17:37 ` kernel test robot
2024-10-22 23:32 ` Wei Yang
2024-10-29 15:17 ` Liam R. Howlett
1 sibling, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2024-10-22 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Yang, akpm, Liam.Howlett
Cc: oe-kbuild-all, maple-tree, linux-mm, Wei Yang, Liam R . Howlett,
Sidhartha Kumar, Lorenzo Stoakes
Hi Wei,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-nonmm-unstable]
[also build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything linus/master v6.12-rc4 next-20241022]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Wei-Yang/maple_tree-print-empty-for-an-empty-tree-on-mt_dump/20241019-103832
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-nonmm-unstable
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241019023716.4516-6-richard.weiyang%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH v4 5/5] maple_tree: add a test checking storing null
config: x86_64-randconfig-123-20241022 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241023/202410230105.UApdwd9S-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 18.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 3b5b5c1ec4a3095ab096dd780e84d7ab81f3d7ff)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241023/202410230105.UApdwd9S-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410230105.UApdwd9S-lkp@intel.com/
sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *entry @@ got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root @@
lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: expected void const *entry
lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root
>> lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *entry @@ got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root @@
lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: expected void const *entry
lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root
lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *entry @@ got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root @@
lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: expected void const *entry
lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root
lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *entry @@ got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root @@
lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: expected void const *entry
lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root
vim +1456 lib/test_maple_tree.c
1389
1390 static noinline void __init check_store_null(struct maple_tree *mt)
1391 {
1392 MA_STATE(mas, mt, 0, ULONG_MAX);
1393
1394 /*
1395 * Store NULL at range [0, ULONG_MAX] to an empty tree should result
1396 * in an empty tree
1397 */
1398 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
1399 mas_lock(&mas);
1400 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
1401 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
1402 mas_unlock(&mas);
1403 mtree_destroy(mt);
1404
1405 /*
1406 * Store NULL at any range to an empty tree should result in an empty
1407 * tree
1408 */
1409 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
1410 mas_lock(&mas);
1411 mas_set_range(&mas, 3, 10);
1412 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
1413 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
1414 mas_unlock(&mas);
1415 mtree_destroy(mt);
1416
1417 /*
1418 * Store NULL at range [0, ULONG_MAX] to a single entry tree should
1419 * result in an empty tree
1420 */
1421 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
1422 mas_lock(&mas);
1423 mas_set(&mas, 0);
1424 mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
1425 mas_set_range(&mas, 0, ULONG_MAX);
1426 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
1427 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
1428 mas_unlock(&mas);
1429 mtree_destroy(mt);
1430
1431 /*
1432 * Store NULL at range [0, n] to a single entry tree should
1433 * result in an empty tree
1434 */
1435 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
1436 mas_lock(&mas);
1437 mas_set(&mas, 0);
1438 mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
1439 mas_set_range(&mas, 0, 5);
1440 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
1441 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
1442 mas_unlock(&mas);
1443 mtree_destroy(mt);
1444
1445 /*
1446 * Store NULL at range [m, n] where m > 0 to a single entry tree
1447 * should still be a single entry tree
1448 */
1449 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
1450 mas_lock(&mas);
1451 mas_set(&mas, 0);
1452 mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
1453 mas_set_range(&mas, 2, 5);
1454 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
1455 MT_BUG_ON(mt, mtree_empty(mt));
> 1456 MT_BUG_ON(mt, xa_is_node(mt->ma_root));
1457 mas_unlock(&mas);
1458 mtree_destroy(mt);
1459
1460 /*
1461 * Store NULL at range [0, ULONG_MAX] to a tree with node should
1462 * result in an empty tree
1463 */
1464 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
1465 mas_lock(&mas);
1466 mas_set_range(&mas, 1, 3);
1467 mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
1468 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !xa_is_node(mt->ma_root));
1469 mas_set_range(&mas, 0, ULONG_MAX);
1470 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
1471 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
1472 mas_unlock(&mas);
1473 mtree_destroy(mt);
1474 }
1475
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] maple_tree: add a test checking storing null
2024-10-22 17:37 ` kernel test robot
@ 2024-10-22 23:32 ` Wei Yang
2024-10-29 15:29 ` Liam R. Howlett
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yang @ 2024-10-22 23:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kernel test robot
Cc: Wei Yang, akpm, Liam.Howlett, oe-kbuild-all, maple-tree, linux-mm,
Sidhartha Kumar, Lorenzo Stoakes
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 01:37:50AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>Hi Wei,
>
>kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
>
>[auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-nonmm-unstable]
>[also build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything linus/master v6.12-rc4 next-20241022]
>[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
>And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
>https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>
>url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Wei-Yang/maple_tree-print-empty-for-an-empty-tree-on-mt_dump/20241019-103832
>base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-nonmm-unstable
>patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241019023716.4516-6-richard.weiyang%40gmail.com
>patch subject: [PATCH v4 5/5] maple_tree: add a test checking storing null
>config: x86_64-randconfig-123-20241022 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241023/202410230105.UApdwd9S-lkp@intel.com/config)
>compiler: clang version 18.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 3b5b5c1ec4a3095ab096dd780e84d7ab81f3d7ff)
>reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241023/202410230105.UApdwd9S-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>
>If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
>the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
>| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410230105.UApdwd9S-lkp@intel.com/
>
>sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>>> lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *entry @@ got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root @@
> lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: expected void const *entry
> lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root
>>> lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *entry @@ got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root @@
> lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: expected void const *entry
> lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root
> lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *entry @@ got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root @@
> lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: expected void const *entry
> lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root
> lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *entry @@ got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root @@
> lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: expected void const *entry
> lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root
>
>vim +1456 lib/test_maple_tree.c
>
> 1389
> 1390 static noinline void __init check_store_null(struct maple_tree *mt)
> 1391 {
> 1392 MA_STATE(mas, mt, 0, ULONG_MAX);
> 1393
> 1394 /*
> 1395 * Store NULL at range [0, ULONG_MAX] to an empty tree should result
> 1396 * in an empty tree
> 1397 */
> 1398 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
> 1399 mas_lock(&mas);
> 1400 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> 1401 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
> 1402 mas_unlock(&mas);
> 1403 mtree_destroy(mt);
> 1404
> 1405 /*
> 1406 * Store NULL at any range to an empty tree should result in an empty
> 1407 * tree
> 1408 */
> 1409 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
> 1410 mas_lock(&mas);
> 1411 mas_set_range(&mas, 3, 10);
> 1412 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> 1413 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
> 1414 mas_unlock(&mas);
> 1415 mtree_destroy(mt);
> 1416
> 1417 /*
> 1418 * Store NULL at range [0, ULONG_MAX] to a single entry tree should
> 1419 * result in an empty tree
> 1420 */
> 1421 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
> 1422 mas_lock(&mas);
> 1423 mas_set(&mas, 0);
> 1424 mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
> 1425 mas_set_range(&mas, 0, ULONG_MAX);
> 1426 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> 1427 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
> 1428 mas_unlock(&mas);
> 1429 mtree_destroy(mt);
> 1430
> 1431 /*
> 1432 * Store NULL at range [0, n] to a single entry tree should
> 1433 * result in an empty tree
> 1434 */
> 1435 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
> 1436 mas_lock(&mas);
> 1437 mas_set(&mas, 0);
> 1438 mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
> 1439 mas_set_range(&mas, 0, 5);
> 1440 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> 1441 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
> 1442 mas_unlock(&mas);
> 1443 mtree_destroy(mt);
> 1444
> 1445 /*
> 1446 * Store NULL at range [m, n] where m > 0 to a single entry tree
> 1447 * should still be a single entry tree
> 1448 */
> 1449 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
> 1450 mas_lock(&mas);
> 1451 mas_set(&mas, 0);
> 1452 mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
> 1453 mas_set_range(&mas, 2, 5);
> 1454 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> 1455 MT_BUG_ON(mt, mtree_empty(mt));
>> 1456 MT_BUG_ON(mt, xa_is_node(mt->ma_root));
Thanks.
Will fix it to xa_is_node(mas_root(&mas)) in next version.
> 1457 mas_unlock(&mas);
> 1458 mtree_destroy(mt);
> 1459
> 1460 /*
> 1461 * Store NULL at range [0, ULONG_MAX] to a tree with node should
> 1462 * result in an empty tree
> 1463 */
> 1464 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
> 1465 mas_lock(&mas);
> 1466 mas_set_range(&mas, 1, 3);
> 1467 mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
> 1468 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !xa_is_node(mt->ma_root));
> 1469 mas_set_range(&mas, 0, ULONG_MAX);
> 1470 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> 1471 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
> 1472 mas_unlock(&mas);
> 1473 mtree_destroy(mt);
> 1474 }
> 1475
>
>--
>0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
>https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] maple_tree: add a test checking storing null
2024-10-22 23:32 ` Wei Yang
@ 2024-10-29 15:29 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-10-31 8:02 ` Wei Yang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Liam R. Howlett @ 2024-10-29 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Yang
Cc: kernel test robot, akpm, oe-kbuild-all, maple-tree, linux-mm,
Sidhartha Kumar, Lorenzo Stoakes
* Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> [241022 19:32]:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 01:37:50AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> >Hi Wei,
> >
> >kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
> >
> >[auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-nonmm-unstable]
> >[also build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything linus/master v6.12-rc4 next-20241022]
> >[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> >And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> >https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
> >
> >url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Wei-Yang/maple_tree-print-empty-for-an-empty-tree-on-mt_dump/20241019-103832
> >base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-nonmm-unstable
> >patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241019023716.4516-6-richard.weiyang%40gmail.com
> >patch subject: [PATCH v4 5/5] maple_tree: add a test checking storing null
> >config: x86_64-randconfig-123-20241022 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241023/202410230105.UApdwd9S-lkp@intel.com/config)
> >compiler: clang version 18.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 3b5b5c1ec4a3095ab096dd780e84d7ab81f3d7ff)
> >reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241023/202410230105.UApdwd9S-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> >
> >If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> >the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> >| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> >| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410230105.UApdwd9S-lkp@intel.com/
> >
> >sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> >>> lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *entry @@ got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root @@
> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: expected void const *entry
> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root
> >>> lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *entry @@ got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root @@
> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: expected void const *entry
> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root
> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *entry @@ got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root @@
> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: expected void const *entry
> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root
> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *entry @@ got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root @@
> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: expected void const *entry
> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root
> >
> >vim +1456 lib/test_maple_tree.c
> >
> > 1389
> > 1390 static noinline void __init check_store_null(struct maple_tree *mt)
> > 1391 {
> > 1392 MA_STATE(mas, mt, 0, ULONG_MAX);
> > 1393
> > 1394 /*
> > 1395 * Store NULL at range [0, ULONG_MAX] to an empty tree should result
> > 1396 * in an empty tree
> > 1397 */
> > 1398 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
> > 1399 mas_lock(&mas);
> > 1400 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> > 1401 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
> > 1402 mas_unlock(&mas);
> > 1403 mtree_destroy(mt);
> > 1404
> > 1405 /*
> > 1406 * Store NULL at any range to an empty tree should result in an empty
> > 1407 * tree
> > 1408 */
> > 1409 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
> > 1410 mas_lock(&mas);
> > 1411 mas_set_range(&mas, 3, 10);
> > 1412 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> > 1413 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
> > 1414 mas_unlock(&mas);
> > 1415 mtree_destroy(mt);
> > 1416
> > 1417 /*
> > 1418 * Store NULL at range [0, ULONG_MAX] to a single entry tree should
> > 1419 * result in an empty tree
> > 1420 */
> > 1421 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
> > 1422 mas_lock(&mas);
> > 1423 mas_set(&mas, 0);
> > 1424 mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
> > 1425 mas_set_range(&mas, 0, ULONG_MAX);
> > 1426 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> > 1427 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
> > 1428 mas_unlock(&mas);
> > 1429 mtree_destroy(mt);
> > 1430
> > 1431 /*
> > 1432 * Store NULL at range [0, n] to a single entry tree should
> > 1433 * result in an empty tree
> > 1434 */
> > 1435 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
> > 1436 mas_lock(&mas);
> > 1437 mas_set(&mas, 0);
> > 1438 mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
> > 1439 mas_set_range(&mas, 0, 5);
> > 1440 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> > 1441 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
> > 1442 mas_unlock(&mas);
> > 1443 mtree_destroy(mt);
> > 1444
> > 1445 /*
> > 1446 * Store NULL at range [m, n] where m > 0 to a single entry tree
> > 1447 * should still be a single entry tree
> > 1448 */
> > 1449 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
> > 1450 mas_lock(&mas);
> > 1451 mas_set(&mas, 0);
> > 1452 mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
> > 1453 mas_set_range(&mas, 2, 5);
> > 1454 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> > 1455 MT_BUG_ON(mt, mtree_empty(mt));
> >> 1456 MT_BUG_ON(mt, xa_is_node(mt->ma_root));
>
> Thanks.
>
> Will fix it to xa_is_node(mas_root(&mas)) in next version.
By the looks of the bot output, there are quite a lot of existing cases
of this in the test code.
>
>
> > 1457 mas_unlock(&mas);
> > 1458 mtree_destroy(mt);
> > 1459
> > 1460 /*
> > 1461 * Store NULL at range [0, ULONG_MAX] to a tree with node should
> > 1462 * result in an empty tree
> > 1463 */
> > 1464 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
> > 1465 mas_lock(&mas);
> > 1466 mas_set_range(&mas, 1, 3);
> > 1467 mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
> > 1468 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !xa_is_node(mt->ma_root));
> > 1469 mas_set_range(&mas, 0, ULONG_MAX);
> > 1470 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> > 1471 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
> > 1472 mas_unlock(&mas);
> > 1473 mtree_destroy(mt);
> > 1474 }
> > 1475
> >
> >--
> >0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> >https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
>
> --
> Wei Yang
> Help you, Help me
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] maple_tree: add a test checking storing null
2024-10-29 15:29 ` Liam R. Howlett
@ 2024-10-31 8:02 ` Wei Yang
2024-10-31 11:17 ` Liam R. Howlett
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yang @ 2024-10-31 8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Liam R. Howlett, Wei Yang, kernel test robot, akpm, oe-kbuild-all,
maple-tree, linux-mm, Sidhartha Kumar, Lorenzo Stoakes
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 11:29:39AM -0400, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
>* Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> [241022 19:32]:
>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 01:37:50AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>> >Hi Wei,
>> >
>> >kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
>> >
>> >[auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-nonmm-unstable]
>> >[also build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything linus/master v6.12-rc4 next-20241022]
>> >[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
>> >And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
>> >https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>> >
>> >url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Wei-Yang/maple_tree-print-empty-for-an-empty-tree-on-mt_dump/20241019-103832
>> >base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-nonmm-unstable
>> >patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241019023716.4516-6-richard.weiyang%40gmail.com
>> >patch subject: [PATCH v4 5/5] maple_tree: add a test checking storing null
>> >config: x86_64-randconfig-123-20241022 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241023/202410230105.UApdwd9S-lkp@intel.com/config)
>> >compiler: clang version 18.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 3b5b5c1ec4a3095ab096dd780e84d7ab81f3d7ff)
>> >reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241023/202410230105.UApdwd9S-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>> >
>> >If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
>> >the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
>> >| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>> >| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410230105.UApdwd9S-lkp@intel.com/
>> >
>> >sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> >>> lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *entry @@ got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root @@
>> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: expected void const *entry
>> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root
>> >>> lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *entry @@ got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root @@
>> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: expected void const *entry
>> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root
>> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *entry @@ got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root @@
>> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: expected void const *entry
>> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root
>> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *entry @@ got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root @@
>> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: expected void const *entry
>> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root
>> >
>> >vim +1456 lib/test_maple_tree.c
>> >
>> > 1389
>> > 1390 static noinline void __init check_store_null(struct maple_tree *mt)
>> > 1391 {
>> > 1392 MA_STATE(mas, mt, 0, ULONG_MAX);
>> > 1393
>> > 1394 /*
>> > 1395 * Store NULL at range [0, ULONG_MAX] to an empty tree should result
>> > 1396 * in an empty tree
>> > 1397 */
>> > 1398 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
>> > 1399 mas_lock(&mas);
>> > 1400 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
>> > 1401 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
>> > 1402 mas_unlock(&mas);
>> > 1403 mtree_destroy(mt);
>> > 1404
>> > 1405 /*
>> > 1406 * Store NULL at any range to an empty tree should result in an empty
>> > 1407 * tree
>> > 1408 */
>> > 1409 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
>> > 1410 mas_lock(&mas);
>> > 1411 mas_set_range(&mas, 3, 10);
>> > 1412 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
>> > 1413 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
>> > 1414 mas_unlock(&mas);
>> > 1415 mtree_destroy(mt);
>> > 1416
>> > 1417 /*
>> > 1418 * Store NULL at range [0, ULONG_MAX] to a single entry tree should
>> > 1419 * result in an empty tree
>> > 1420 */
>> > 1421 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
>> > 1422 mas_lock(&mas);
>> > 1423 mas_set(&mas, 0);
>> > 1424 mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
>> > 1425 mas_set_range(&mas, 0, ULONG_MAX);
>> > 1426 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
>> > 1427 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
>> > 1428 mas_unlock(&mas);
>> > 1429 mtree_destroy(mt);
>> > 1430
>> > 1431 /*
>> > 1432 * Store NULL at range [0, n] to a single entry tree should
>> > 1433 * result in an empty tree
>> > 1434 */
>> > 1435 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
>> > 1436 mas_lock(&mas);
>> > 1437 mas_set(&mas, 0);
>> > 1438 mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
>> > 1439 mas_set_range(&mas, 0, 5);
>> > 1440 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
>> > 1441 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
>> > 1442 mas_unlock(&mas);
>> > 1443 mtree_destroy(mt);
>> > 1444
>> > 1445 /*
>> > 1446 * Store NULL at range [m, n] where m > 0 to a single entry tree
>> > 1447 * should still be a single entry tree
>> > 1448 */
>> > 1449 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
>> > 1450 mas_lock(&mas);
>> > 1451 mas_set(&mas, 0);
>> > 1452 mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
>> > 1453 mas_set_range(&mas, 2, 5);
>> > 1454 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
>> > 1455 MT_BUG_ON(mt, mtree_empty(mt));
>> >> 1456 MT_BUG_ON(mt, xa_is_node(mt->ma_root));
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Will fix it to xa_is_node(mas_root(&mas)) in next version.
>
>By the looks of the bot output, there are quite a lot of existing cases
>of this in the test code.
>
Hi, Liam
Thanks for your review. I may not follow you.
I saw you add you RB. Do you prefer me to spin a new round with this adjusted
or the current version is fine?
>>
>>
>> > 1457 mas_unlock(&mas);
>> > 1458 mtree_destroy(mt);
>> > 1459
>> > 1460 /*
>> > 1461 * Store NULL at range [0, ULONG_MAX] to a tree with node should
>> > 1462 * result in an empty tree
>> > 1463 */
>> > 1464 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
>> > 1465 mas_lock(&mas);
>> > 1466 mas_set_range(&mas, 1, 3);
>> > 1467 mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
>> > 1468 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !xa_is_node(mt->ma_root));
>> > 1469 mas_set_range(&mas, 0, ULONG_MAX);
>> > 1470 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
>> > 1471 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
>> > 1472 mas_unlock(&mas);
>> > 1473 mtree_destroy(mt);
>> > 1474 }
>> > 1475
>> >
>> >--
>> >0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
>> >https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
>>
>> --
>> Wei Yang
>> Help you, Help me
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] maple_tree: add a test checking storing null
2024-10-31 8:02 ` Wei Yang
@ 2024-10-31 11:17 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-10-31 23:04 ` Wei Yang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Liam R. Howlett @ 2024-10-31 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Yang
Cc: kernel test robot, akpm, oe-kbuild-all, maple-tree, linux-mm,
Sidhartha Kumar, Lorenzo Stoakes
* Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> [241031 04:02]:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 11:29:39AM -0400, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> >* Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> [241022 19:32]:
> >> On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 01:37:50AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> >> >Hi Wei,
> >> >
> >> >kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
> >> >
> >> >[auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-nonmm-unstable]
> >> >[also build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything linus/master v6.12-rc4 next-20241022]
> >> >[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> >> >And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> >> >https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
> >> >
> >> >url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Wei-Yang/maple_tree-print-empty-for-an-empty-tree-on-mt_dump/20241019-103832
> >> >base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-nonmm-unstable
> >> >patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241019023716.4516-6-richard.weiyang%40gmail.com
> >> >patch subject: [PATCH v4 5/5] maple_tree: add a test checking storing null
> >> >config: x86_64-randconfig-123-20241022 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241023/202410230105.UApdwd9S-lkp@intel.com/config)
> >> >compiler: clang version 18.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 3b5b5c1ec4a3095ab096dd780e84d7ab81f3d7ff)
> >> >reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241023/202410230105.UApdwd9S-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> >> >
> >> >If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> >> >the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> >> >| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> >> >| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410230105.UApdwd9S-lkp@intel.com/
> >> >
> >> >sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> >> >>> lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *entry @@ got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root @@
> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: expected void const *entry
> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root
> >> >>> lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *entry @@ got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root @@
> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: expected void const *entry
> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root
> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *entry @@ got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root @@
> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: expected void const *entry
> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root
> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *entry @@ got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root @@
> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: expected void const *entry
> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root
> >> >
> >> >vim +1456 lib/test_maple_tree.c
> >> >
> >> > 1389
> >> > 1390 static noinline void __init check_store_null(struct maple_tree *mt)
> >> > 1391 {
> >> > 1392 MA_STATE(mas, mt, 0, ULONG_MAX);
> >> > 1393
> >> > 1394 /*
> >> > 1395 * Store NULL at range [0, ULONG_MAX] to an empty tree should result
> >> > 1396 * in an empty tree
> >> > 1397 */
> >> > 1398 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
> >> > 1399 mas_lock(&mas);
> >> > 1400 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> > 1401 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
> >> > 1402 mas_unlock(&mas);
> >> > 1403 mtree_destroy(mt);
> >> > 1404
> >> > 1405 /*
> >> > 1406 * Store NULL at any range to an empty tree should result in an empty
> >> > 1407 * tree
> >> > 1408 */
> >> > 1409 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
> >> > 1410 mas_lock(&mas);
> >> > 1411 mas_set_range(&mas, 3, 10);
> >> > 1412 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> > 1413 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
> >> > 1414 mas_unlock(&mas);
> >> > 1415 mtree_destroy(mt);
> >> > 1416
> >> > 1417 /*
> >> > 1418 * Store NULL at range [0, ULONG_MAX] to a single entry tree should
> >> > 1419 * result in an empty tree
> >> > 1420 */
> >> > 1421 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
> >> > 1422 mas_lock(&mas);
> >> > 1423 mas_set(&mas, 0);
> >> > 1424 mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> > 1425 mas_set_range(&mas, 0, ULONG_MAX);
> >> > 1426 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> > 1427 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
> >> > 1428 mas_unlock(&mas);
> >> > 1429 mtree_destroy(mt);
> >> > 1430
> >> > 1431 /*
> >> > 1432 * Store NULL at range [0, n] to a single entry tree should
> >> > 1433 * result in an empty tree
> >> > 1434 */
> >> > 1435 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
> >> > 1436 mas_lock(&mas);
> >> > 1437 mas_set(&mas, 0);
> >> > 1438 mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> > 1439 mas_set_range(&mas, 0, 5);
> >> > 1440 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> > 1441 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
> >> > 1442 mas_unlock(&mas);
> >> > 1443 mtree_destroy(mt);
> >> > 1444
> >> > 1445 /*
> >> > 1446 * Store NULL at range [m, n] where m > 0 to a single entry tree
> >> > 1447 * should still be a single entry tree
> >> > 1448 */
> >> > 1449 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
> >> > 1450 mas_lock(&mas);
> >> > 1451 mas_set(&mas, 0);
> >> > 1452 mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> > 1453 mas_set_range(&mas, 2, 5);
> >> > 1454 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> > 1455 MT_BUG_ON(mt, mtree_empty(mt));
> >> >> 1456 MT_BUG_ON(mt, xa_is_node(mt->ma_root));
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> Will fix it to xa_is_node(mas_root(&mas)) in next version.
> >
> >By the looks of the bot output, there are quite a lot of existing cases
> >of this in the test code.
> >
>
> Hi, Liam
>
> Thanks for your review. I may not follow you.
>
> I saw you add you RB. Do you prefer me to spin a new round with this adjusted
> or the current version is fine?
Please fix what you added. The rest will need to eventually be fixed,
but someone can do that later.
>
> >>
> >>
> >> > 1457 mas_unlock(&mas);
> >> > 1458 mtree_destroy(mt);
> >> > 1459
> >> > 1460 /*
> >> > 1461 * Store NULL at range [0, ULONG_MAX] to a tree with node should
> >> > 1462 * result in an empty tree
> >> > 1463 */
> >> > 1464 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
> >> > 1465 mas_lock(&mas);
> >> > 1466 mas_set_range(&mas, 1, 3);
> >> > 1467 mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> > 1468 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !xa_is_node(mt->ma_root));
> >> > 1469 mas_set_range(&mas, 0, ULONG_MAX);
> >> > 1470 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> >> > 1471 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
> >> > 1472 mas_unlock(&mas);
> >> > 1473 mtree_destroy(mt);
> >> > 1474 }
> >> > 1475
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> >> >https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
> >>
> >> --
> >> Wei Yang
> >> Help you, Help me
>
> --
> Wei Yang
> Help you, Help me
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] maple_tree: add a test checking storing null
2024-10-31 11:17 ` Liam R. Howlett
@ 2024-10-31 23:04 ` Wei Yang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yang @ 2024-10-31 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Liam R. Howlett, Wei Yang, kernel test robot, akpm, oe-kbuild-all,
maple-tree, linux-mm, Sidhartha Kumar, Lorenzo Stoakes
On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 07:17:28AM -0400, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
>* Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> [241031 04:02]:
>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 11:29:39AM -0400, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
>> >* Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> [241022 19:32]:
>> >> On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 01:37:50AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>> >> >Hi Wei,
>> >> >
>> >> >kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
>> >> >
>> >> >[auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-nonmm-unstable]
>> >> >[also build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything linus/master v6.12-rc4 next-20241022]
>> >> >[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
>> >> >And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
>> >> >https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>> >> >
>> >> >url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Wei-Yang/maple_tree-print-empty-for-an-empty-tree-on-mt_dump/20241019-103832
>> >> >base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-nonmm-unstable
>> >> >patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241019023716.4516-6-richard.weiyang%40gmail.com
>> >> >patch subject: [PATCH v4 5/5] maple_tree: add a test checking storing null
>> >> >config: x86_64-randconfig-123-20241022 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241023/202410230105.UApdwd9S-lkp@intel.com/config)
>> >> >compiler: clang version 18.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 3b5b5c1ec4a3095ab096dd780e84d7ab81f3d7ff)
>> >> >reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241023/202410230105.UApdwd9S-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>> >> >
>> >> >If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
>> >> >the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
>> >> >| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>> >> >| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410230105.UApdwd9S-lkp@intel.com/
>> >> >
>> >> >sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> >> >>> lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *entry @@ got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root @@
>> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: expected void const *entry
>> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root
>> >> >>> lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *entry @@ got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root @@
>> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: expected void const *entry
>> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1456:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root
>> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *entry @@ got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root @@
>> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: expected void const *entry
>> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root
>> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@ expected void const *entry @@ got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root @@
>> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: expected void const *entry
>> >> > lib/test_maple_tree.c:1468:9: sparse: got void [noderef] __rcu *ma_root
>> >> >
>> >> >vim +1456 lib/test_maple_tree.c
>> >> >
>> >> > 1389
>> >> > 1390 static noinline void __init check_store_null(struct maple_tree *mt)
>> >> > 1391 {
>> >> > 1392 MA_STATE(mas, mt, 0, ULONG_MAX);
>> >> > 1393
>> >> > 1394 /*
>> >> > 1395 * Store NULL at range [0, ULONG_MAX] to an empty tree should result
>> >> > 1396 * in an empty tree
>> >> > 1397 */
>> >> > 1398 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
>> >> > 1399 mas_lock(&mas);
>> >> > 1400 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
>> >> > 1401 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
>> >> > 1402 mas_unlock(&mas);
>> >> > 1403 mtree_destroy(mt);
>> >> > 1404
>> >> > 1405 /*
>> >> > 1406 * Store NULL at any range to an empty tree should result in an empty
>> >> > 1407 * tree
>> >> > 1408 */
>> >> > 1409 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
>> >> > 1410 mas_lock(&mas);
>> >> > 1411 mas_set_range(&mas, 3, 10);
>> >> > 1412 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
>> >> > 1413 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
>> >> > 1414 mas_unlock(&mas);
>> >> > 1415 mtree_destroy(mt);
>> >> > 1416
>> >> > 1417 /*
>> >> > 1418 * Store NULL at range [0, ULONG_MAX] to a single entry tree should
>> >> > 1419 * result in an empty tree
>> >> > 1420 */
>> >> > 1421 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
>> >> > 1422 mas_lock(&mas);
>> >> > 1423 mas_set(&mas, 0);
>> >> > 1424 mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
>> >> > 1425 mas_set_range(&mas, 0, ULONG_MAX);
>> >> > 1426 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
>> >> > 1427 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
>> >> > 1428 mas_unlock(&mas);
>> >> > 1429 mtree_destroy(mt);
>> >> > 1430
>> >> > 1431 /*
>> >> > 1432 * Store NULL at range [0, n] to a single entry tree should
>> >> > 1433 * result in an empty tree
>> >> > 1434 */
>> >> > 1435 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
>> >> > 1436 mas_lock(&mas);
>> >> > 1437 mas_set(&mas, 0);
>> >> > 1438 mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
>> >> > 1439 mas_set_range(&mas, 0, 5);
>> >> > 1440 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
>> >> > 1441 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
>> >> > 1442 mas_unlock(&mas);
>> >> > 1443 mtree_destroy(mt);
>> >> > 1444
>> >> > 1445 /*
>> >> > 1446 * Store NULL at range [m, n] where m > 0 to a single entry tree
>> >> > 1447 * should still be a single entry tree
>> >> > 1448 */
>> >> > 1449 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
>> >> > 1450 mas_lock(&mas);
>> >> > 1451 mas_set(&mas, 0);
>> >> > 1452 mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
>> >> > 1453 mas_set_range(&mas, 2, 5);
>> >> > 1454 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
>> >> > 1455 MT_BUG_ON(mt, mtree_empty(mt));
>> >> >> 1456 MT_BUG_ON(mt, xa_is_node(mt->ma_root));
>> >>
>> >> Thanks.
>> >>
>> >> Will fix it to xa_is_node(mas_root(&mas)) in next version.
>> >
>> >By the looks of the bot output, there are quite a lot of existing cases
>> >of this in the test code.
>> >
>>
>> Hi, Liam
>>
>> Thanks for your review. I may not follow you.
>>
>> I saw you add you RB. Do you prefer me to spin a new round with this adjusted
>> or the current version is fine?
>
>Please fix what you added. The rest will need to eventually be fixed,
>but someone can do that later.
>
Got it, thanks.
>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > 1457 mas_unlock(&mas);
>> >> > 1458 mtree_destroy(mt);
>> >> > 1459
>> >> > 1460 /*
>> >> > 1461 * Store NULL at range [0, ULONG_MAX] to a tree with node should
>> >> > 1462 * result in an empty tree
>> >> > 1463 */
>> >> > 1464 mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
>> >> > 1465 mas_lock(&mas);
>> >> > 1466 mas_set_range(&mas, 1, 3);
>> >> > 1467 mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
>> >> > 1468 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !xa_is_node(mt->ma_root));
>> >> > 1469 mas_set_range(&mas, 0, ULONG_MAX);
>> >> > 1470 mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
>> >> > 1471 MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
>> >> > 1472 mas_unlock(&mas);
>> >> > 1473 mtree_destroy(mt);
>> >> > 1474 }
>> >> > 1475
>> >> >
>> >> >--
>> >> >0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
>> >> >https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Wei Yang
>> >> Help you, Help me
>>
>> --
>> Wei Yang
>> Help you, Help me
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] maple_tree: add a test checking storing null
2024-10-19 2:37 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] maple_tree: add a test checking storing null Wei Yang
2024-10-22 17:37 ` kernel test robot
@ 2024-10-29 15:17 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-10-29 15:22 ` Liam R. Howlett
1 sibling, 1 reply; 19+ messages in thread
From: Liam R. Howlett @ 2024-10-29 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Yang; +Cc: akpm, maple-tree, linux-mm, Sidhartha Kumar, Lorenzo Stoakes
* Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> [241018 22:37]:
> Add a test to assert that, when storing null to am empty tree or a
> single entry tree it will not result into:
>
> * a root node with range [0, ULONG_MAX] set to NULL
> * a root node with consecutive slot set to NULL
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
> CC: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
> CC: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
> CC: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
This patch doesn't apply to the tag you specified or I'm using the wrong
git id. I tried git id e993457df.
>
> ---
> v3: move test into lib/test_maple_tree.c
> ---
> lib/test_maple_tree.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/test_maple_tree.c b/lib/test_maple_tree.c
> index 31561e0e1a0d..2ef72f6c6d1b 100644
> --- a/lib/test_maple_tree.c
> +++ b/lib/test_maple_tree.c
> @@ -1387,6 +1387,92 @@ static noinline void __init check_prev_entry(struct maple_tree *mt)
> mas_unlock(&mas);
> }
>
> +static noinline void __init check_store_null(struct maple_tree *mt)
> +{
> + MA_STATE(mas, mt, 0, ULONG_MAX);
> +
> + /*
> + * Store NULL at range [0, ULONG_MAX] to an empty tree should result
> + * in an empty tree
> + */
> + mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
> + mas_lock(&mas);
> + mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> + MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
> + mas_unlock(&mas);
> + mtree_destroy(mt);
> +
> + /*
> + * Store NULL at any range to an empty tree should result in an empty
> + * tree
> + */
> + mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
> + mas_lock(&mas);
> + mas_set_range(&mas, 3, 10);
> + mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> + MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
> + mas_unlock(&mas);
> + mtree_destroy(mt);
> +
> + /*
> + * Store NULL at range [0, ULONG_MAX] to a single entry tree should
> + * result in an empty tree
> + */
> + mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
> + mas_lock(&mas);
> + mas_set(&mas, 0);
> + mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
> + mas_set_range(&mas, 0, ULONG_MAX);
> + mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> + MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
> + mas_unlock(&mas);
> + mtree_destroy(mt);
> +
> + /*
> + * Store NULL at range [0, n] to a single entry tree should
> + * result in an empty tree
> + */
> + mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
> + mas_lock(&mas);
> + mas_set(&mas, 0);
> + mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
> + mas_set_range(&mas, 0, 5);
> + mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> + MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
> + mas_unlock(&mas);
> + mtree_destroy(mt);
> +
> + /*
> + * Store NULL at range [m, n] where m > 0 to a single entry tree
> + * should still be a single entry tree
> + */
> + mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
> + mas_lock(&mas);
> + mas_set(&mas, 0);
> + mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
> + mas_set_range(&mas, 2, 5);
> + mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> + MT_BUG_ON(mt, mtree_empty(mt));
> + MT_BUG_ON(mt, xa_is_node(mt->ma_root));
> + mas_unlock(&mas);
> + mtree_destroy(mt);
> +
> + /*
> + * Store NULL at range [0, ULONG_MAX] to a tree with node should
> + * result in an empty tree
> + */
> + mt_init_flags(mt, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
> + mas_lock(&mas);
> + mas_set_range(&mas, 1, 3);
> + mas_store_gfp(&mas, &mas, GFP_KERNEL);
> + MT_BUG_ON(mt, !xa_is_node(mt->ma_root));
> + mas_set_range(&mas, 0, ULONG_MAX);
> + mas_store_gfp(&mas, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> + MT_BUG_ON(mt, !mtree_empty(mt));
> + mas_unlock(&mas);
> + mtree_destroy(mt);
> +}
> +
> static noinline void __init check_root_expand(struct maple_tree *mt)
> {
> MA_STATE(mas, mt, 0, 0);
> @@ -3710,6 +3796,10 @@ static int __init maple_tree_seed(void)
> goto skip;
> #endif
>
> + mt_init_flags(&tree, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
> + check_store_null(&tree);
> + mtree_destroy(&tree);
> +
> mt_init_flags(&tree, MT_FLAGS_ALLOC_RANGE);
> check_root_expand(&tree);
> mtree_destroy(&tree);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] maple_tree: add a test checking storing null
2024-10-29 15:17 ` Liam R. Howlett
@ 2024-10-29 15:22 ` Liam R. Howlett
0 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Liam R. Howlett @ 2024-10-29 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Yang, akpm, maple-tree, linux-mm, Sidhartha Kumar,
Lorenzo Stoakes
* Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> [241029 11:17]:
> * Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> [241018 22:37]:
> > Add a test to assert that, when storing null to am empty tree or a
> > single entry tree it will not result into:
> >
> > * a root node with range [0, ULONG_MAX] set to NULL
> > * a root node with consecutive slot set to NULL
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
> > CC: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
> > CC: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
> > CC: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
>
> This patch doesn't apply to the tag you specified or I'm using the wrong
> git id. I tried git id e993457df.
It seems okay and looks good.
Reviewed-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] refine storing NULL
2024-10-19 2:37 [PATCH v4 0/5] refine storing NULL Wei Yang
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-10-19 2:37 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] maple_tree: add a test checking storing null Wei Yang
@ 2024-10-19 2:42 ` Wei Yang
5 siblings, 0 replies; 19+ messages in thread
From: Wei Yang @ 2024-10-19 2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Yang; +Cc: akpm, Liam.Howlett, maple-tree, linux-mm
On Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 02:37:11AM +0000, Wei Yang wrote:
>The original thread[1] thoughts it is a problem in mas_new_root(). But after
>discussion, this should be an improvement on storing NULL.
>
>Patch 1/2 preparation for refine.
>
>Patch 3 remove redundant check in mas_new_root().
>
>Patch 4 refine mas_store_root() to improve memory efficiency and remove
>possible consecutive NULL slot.
>
>Patch 5 adds a test for storing NULL.
Forget to say, this is still based on yesterday's master.
4d939780b705 2024-10-17 Merge tag 'mm-hotfixes-stable-2024-10-17-16-08' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
>
>[1]: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241015233909.23592-1-richard.weiyang@gmail.com
>
>v4:
> patch 3 add a WARN_ON_ONCE()
> patch 4 add a comment and simplify the logic a little
>
>v3:
> patch 4 move the change into mas_store_root()
> patch 5 move test into lib/test_maple_tree.c
>
>Wei Yang (5):
> maple_tree: print empty for an empty tree on mt_dump()
> maple_tree: the return value of mas_root_expand() is not used
> maple_tree: not necessary to check index/last again
> maple_tree: refine mas_store_root() on storing NULL
> maple_tree: add a test checking storing null
>
> lib/maple_tree.c | 29 ++++++++++----
> lib/test_maple_tree.c | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
>--
>2.34.1
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 19+ messages in thread