* [leon-rdma:dma-split-wip 11/26] mm/hmm.c:642:17: error: 'struct device' has no member named 'dma_skip_sync'
@ 2024-10-23 1:12 kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2024-10-23 1:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Leon Romanovsky; +Cc: oe-kbuild-all
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/leon/linux-rdma.git dma-split-wip
head: c651d2118e26e1ac43db75c53cc4b4a51c41984b
commit: 8beafe484c79bce5de4807d390d93250449fecee [11/26] mm/hmm: generalize managing PFN and DMA lists
config: i386-randconfig-141-20241023 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241023/202410230904.pPSwIFSx-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241023/202410230904.pPSwIFSx-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410230904.pPSwIFSx-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
mm/hmm.c: In function 'hmm_map_alloc':
>> mm/hmm.c:642:17: error: 'struct device' has no member named 'dma_skip_sync'
642 | if (!dev->dma_skip_sync || dma_addressing_limited(dev))
| ^~
vim +642 mm/hmm.c
618
619 /**
620 * hmm_map_alloc - Allocate HMM map structure
621 * @dev: device to allocate structure for
622 * @map: HMM map to allocate
623 * @nr_entries: number of entries in the map
624 * @dma_entry_size: size of the DMA entry in the map
625 *
626 * Allocate the HMM map structure and all the lists it contains.
627 * Return 0 on success, -ENOMEM on failure.
628 */
629 int hmm_map_alloc(struct device *dev, struct hmm_map *map, size_t nr_entries,
630 size_t dma_entry_size)
631 {
632 bool use_iova;
633
634 if (!(nr_entries * PAGE_SIZE / dma_entry_size))
635 return -EINVAL;
636
637 /*
638 * The HMM API violates our normal DMA buffer ownership rules and can't
639 * transfer buffer ownership. The dma_addressing_limited() check is a
640 * best approximation to ensure no swiotlb buffering happens.
641 */
> 642 if (!dev->dma_skip_sync || dma_addressing_limited(dev))
643 return -EOPNOTSUPP;
644
645 map->dma_entry_size = dma_entry_size;
646 map->pfn_list =
647 kvcalloc(nr_entries, sizeof(*map->pfn_list), GFP_KERNEL);
648 if (!map->pfn_list)
649 return -ENOMEM;
650
651 use_iova = dma_iova_try_alloc(dev, &map->state, 0,
652 nr_entries * PAGE_SIZE);
653 if (!use_iova && dma_need_unmap(dev)) {
654 map->dma_list = kvcalloc(nr_entries, sizeof(*map->dma_list),
655 GFP_KERNEL);
656 if (!map->dma_list)
657 goto err_dma;
658 }
659 return 0;
660
661 err_dma:
662 kfree(map->pfn_list);
663 return -ENOMEM;
664 }
665 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hmm_map_alloc);
666
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2024-10-23 1:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-10-23 1:12 [leon-rdma:dma-split-wip 11/26] mm/hmm.c:642:17: error: 'struct device' has no member named 'dma_skip_sync' kernel test robot
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.