From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Cc: Conor Culhane <conor.culhane@silvaco.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>,
linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:SILVACO I3C
DUAL-ROLE MASTER), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list),
imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] i3c: master: svc: Modify enabled_events bit 7:0 to act as IBI enable counter
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 09:53:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241025095318.4785df2c@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241024203855.1584416-1-Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Hi Frank,
Frank.Li@nxp.com wrote on Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:38:55 -0400:
> Fix issue where disabling IBI on one device disables the entire IBI
> interrupt. Modify bit 7:0 of enabled_events to serve as an IBI enable
Is this bitfield arbitrary?
Is there a rationale behind it?
> counter, ensuring that the system IBI interrupt is disabled only when all
> I3C devices have IBI disabled.
>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org
> Fixes: 7ff730ca458e ("i3c: master: svc: enable the interrupt in the enable ibi function")
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Anyway,
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Thanks,
Miquèl
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Cc: Conor Culhane <conor.culhane@silvaco.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>,
linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:SILVACO I3C
DUAL-ROLE MASTER), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list),
imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] i3c: master: svc: Modify enabled_events bit 7:0 to act as IBI enable counter
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 09:53:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241025095318.4785df2c@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241024203855.1584416-1-Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Hi Frank,
Frank.Li@nxp.com wrote on Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:38:55 -0400:
> Fix issue where disabling IBI on one device disables the entire IBI
> interrupt. Modify bit 7:0 of enabled_events to serve as an IBI enable
Is this bitfield arbitrary?
Is there a rationale behind it?
> counter, ensuring that the system IBI interrupt is disabled only when all
> I3C devices have IBI disabled.
>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org
> Fixes: 7ff730ca458e ("i3c: master: svc: enable the interrupt in the enable ibi function")
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Anyway,
Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
Thanks,
Miquèl
--
linux-i3c mailing list
linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-i3c
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-25 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-24 20:38 [PATCH 1/1] i3c: master: svc: Modify enabled_events bit 7:0 to act as IBI enable counter Frank Li
2024-10-24 20:38 ` Frank Li
2024-10-25 7:53 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2024-10-25 7:53 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-10-25 14:00 ` Frank Li
2024-10-25 14:00 ` Frank Li
2024-10-25 14:10 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-10-25 14:10 ` Miquel Raynal
2024-10-31 23:05 ` Alexandre Belloni
2024-10-31 23:05 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241025095318.4785df2c@xps-13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=conor.culhane@silvaco.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.