All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alejandro Vallejo <alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: "Alejandro Vallejo" <alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com>,
	"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 13/13] x86/xstate: Make xstate_all() and vcpu_xsave_mask() take explicit xstate
Date: Tue,  5 Nov 2024 14:33:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241105143310.28301-14-alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241105143310.28301-1-alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com>

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Alejandro Vallejo <alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com>
---
 xen/arch/x86/i387.c               | 9 +++++----
 xen/arch/x86/include/asm/xstate.h | 5 +++--
 xen/arch/x86/xstate.c             | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/i387.c b/xen/arch/x86/i387.c
index c794367a3cc7..36a6c8918162 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/i387.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/i387.c
@@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ static inline void fpu_fxrstor(struct vcpu *v, const fpusse_t *fpu_ctxt)
 /*      FPU Save Functions     */
 /*******************************/
 
-static inline uint64_t vcpu_xsave_mask(const struct vcpu *v)
+static inline uint64_t vcpu_xsave_mask(const struct vcpu *v,
+                                       const struct xsave_struct *xsave_area)
 {
     if ( v->fpu_dirtied )
         return v->arch.nonlazy_xstate_used ? XSTATE_ALL : XSTATE_LAZY;
@@ -124,14 +125,14 @@ static inline uint64_t vcpu_xsave_mask(const struct vcpu *v)
      * XSTATE_FP_SSE), vcpu_xsave_mask will return XSTATE_ALL. Otherwise
      * return XSTATE_NONLAZY.
      */
-    return xstate_all(v) ? XSTATE_ALL : XSTATE_NONLAZY;
+    return xstate_all(v, xsave_area) ? XSTATE_ALL : XSTATE_NONLAZY;
 }
 
 /* Save x87 extended state */
 static inline void fpu_xsave(const struct vcpu *v, struct xsave_struct *xsave_area)
 {
     bool ok;
-    uint64_t mask = vcpu_xsave_mask(v);
+    uint64_t mask = vcpu_xsave_mask(v, xsave_area);
 
     ASSERT(mask);
     /*
@@ -211,7 +212,7 @@ void vcpu_restore_fpu_nonlazy(struct vcpu *v, bool need_stts)
      * saving state belonging to another vCPU.
      */
     xsave_area = VCPU_MAP_XSAVE_AREA(v);
-    if ( v->arch.fully_eager_fpu || xstate_all(v) )
+    if ( v->arch.fully_eager_fpu || xstate_all(v, xsave_area) )
     {
         if ( cpu_has_xsave )
             fpu_xrstor(v, xsave_area, XSTATE_ALL);
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/xstate.h b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/xstate.h
index d2ef4c0b25f0..e3e9c18239ed 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/xstate.h
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/xstate.h
@@ -132,14 +132,15 @@ xsave_area_compressed(const struct xsave_struct *xsave_area)
     return xsave_area->xsave_hdr.xcomp_bv & XSTATE_COMPACTION_ENABLED;
 }
 
-static inline bool xstate_all(const struct vcpu *v)
+static inline bool xstate_all(const struct vcpu *v,
+                              const struct xsave_struct *xsave_area)
 {
     /*
      * XSTATE_FP_SSE may be excluded, because the offsets of XSTATE_FP_SSE
      * (in the legacy region of xsave area) are fixed, so saving
      * XSTATE_FP_SSE will not cause overwriting problem with XSAVES/XSAVEC.
      */
-    return xsave_area_compressed(v->arch.xsave_area) &&
+    return xsave_area_compressed(xsave_area) &&
            (v->arch.xcr0_accum & XSTATE_LAZY & ~XSTATE_FP_SSE);
 }
 
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/xstate.c b/xen/arch/x86/xstate.c
index b5e8d90ef600..26e460adfd79 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/xstate.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/xstate.c
@@ -1003,7 +1003,7 @@ int handle_xsetbv(u32 index, u64 new_bv)
             asm ( "stmxcsr %0" : "=m" (xsave_area->fpu_sse.mxcsr) );
             VCPU_UNMAP_XSAVE_AREA(curr, xsave_area);
         }
-        else if ( xstate_all(curr) )
+        else if ( xstate_all(curr, xsave_area) )
         {
             /* See the comment in i387.c:vcpu_restore_fpu_eager(). */
             mask |= XSTATE_LAZY;
-- 
2.47.0



  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-05 14:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-05 14:32 [PATCH v2 00/13] x86: Address Space Isolation FPU preparations Alejandro Vallejo
2024-11-05 14:32 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] x86/xstate: Remove stale assertions in fpu_x{rstor,save}() Alejandro Vallejo
2024-11-07 10:29   ` Jan Beulich
2024-11-05 14:32 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] x86/xstate: Create map/unmap primitives for xsave areas Alejandro Vallejo
2024-12-09 16:11   ` Jan Beulich
2024-12-16 11:00     ` Alejandro Vallejo
2024-11-05 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] x86/hvm: Map/unmap xsave area in hvm_save_cpu_ctxt() Alejandro Vallejo
2024-12-09 16:13   ` Jan Beulich
2024-11-05 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] x86/fpu: Map/umap xsave area in vcpu_{reset,setup}_fpu() Alejandro Vallejo
2024-12-09 16:14   ` Jan Beulich
2024-11-05 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] x86/xstate: Map/unmap xsave area in xstate_set_init() and handle_setbv() Alejandro Vallejo
2024-12-09 16:16   ` Jan Beulich
2024-12-16 11:02     ` Alejandro Vallejo
2024-11-05 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] x86/hvm: Map/unmap xsave area in hvmemul_{get,put}_fpu() Alejandro Vallejo
2024-12-09 16:18   ` Jan Beulich
2024-11-05 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] x86/domctl: Map/unmap xsave area in arch_get_info_guest() Alejandro Vallejo
2024-12-09 16:19   ` Jan Beulich
2024-11-05 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] x86/xstate: Map/unmap xsave area in {compress,expand}_xsave_states() Alejandro Vallejo
2024-12-09 16:20   ` Jan Beulich
2024-12-16 11:36     ` Alejandro Vallejo
2024-11-05 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] x86/emulator: Refactor FXSAVE_AREA to use wrappers Alejandro Vallejo
2024-12-09 16:26   ` Jan Beulich
2024-12-16 11:58     ` Alejandro Vallejo
2024-12-16 12:01       ` Jan Beulich
2024-12-16 14:37         ` Alejandro Vallejo
2024-11-05 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] x86/mpx: Map/unmap xsave area in in read_bndcfgu() Alejandro Vallejo
2024-12-09 16:30   ` Jan Beulich
2024-12-16 12:00     ` Alejandro Vallejo
2024-12-16 12:03       ` Jan Beulich
2024-12-16 14:02         ` Alejandro Vallejo
2025-01-10 11:40           ` Alejandro Vallejo
2024-11-05 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] x86/fpu: Pass explicit xsave areas to fpu_(f)xsave() Alejandro Vallejo
2024-12-09 16:37   ` Jan Beulich
2024-11-05 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] x86/fpu: Pass explicit xsave areas to fpu_(f)xrstor() Alejandro Vallejo
2024-12-09 16:39   ` Jan Beulich
2024-11-05 14:33 ` Alejandro Vallejo [this message]
2024-12-09 16:41   ` [PATCH v2 13/13] x86/xstate: Make xstate_all() and vcpu_xsave_mask() take explicit xstate Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241105143310.28301-14-alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com \
    --to=alejandro.vallejo@cloud.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.