All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	Nadia Pinaeva <n.m.pinaeva@gmail.com>,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: conntrack: add conntrack event timestamp
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 19:25:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241112182553.GC28817@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241107194117.32116-1-fw@strlen.de>

Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote:
> Nadia Pinaeva writes:
>   I am working on a tool that allows collecting network performance
>   metrics by using conntrack events.
>   Start time of a conntrack entry is used to evaluate seen_reply
>   latency, therefore the sooner it is timestamped, the better the
>   precision is.
>   In particular, when using this tool to compare the performance of the
>   same feature implemented using iptables/nftables/OVS it is crucial
>   to have the entry timestamped earlier to see any difference.
> 
> At this time, conntrack events can only get timestamped at recv time in
> userspace, so there can be some delay between the event being generated
> and the userspace process consuming the message.
> 
> There is sys/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_timestamp, which adds a
> 64bit timestamp (ns resolution) that records start and stop times,
> but its not suited for this either, start time is the 'hashtable insertion
> time', not 'conntrack allocation time'.
> 
> There is concern that moving the start-time moment to conntrack
> allocation will add overhead in case of flooding, where conntrack
> entries are allocated and released right away without getting inserted
> into the hashtable.
> 
> Also, even if this was changed it would not with events other than
> new (start time) and destroy (stop time).
> 
> Pablo suggested to add new CTA_TIMESTAMP_EVENT, this adds this feature.
> The timestamp is recorded in case both events are requested and the
> sys/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_timestamp toggle is enabled.

I was about to send v2 of this patch, but I found following comment in
ulogd source code (input/flow/ulogd_inpflow_NFCT.c):

 *      - add nanosecond-accurate packet receive timestamp of event-changing
 *        packets to {ip,nf}_conntrack_netlink, so we can have accurate IPFIX
 *        flowStart / flowEnd NanoSeconds.


I'm leaning towards reworking this patch to replace ktime_get_real_ns()
by

ktime_to_ns(skb_tstamp_cond(skb, 1)))

so that the event carries the packet receive timestamp if that was
available or the current clock time as fallback.

Thoughts?  Otherwise I can ignore above comment and keep
ktime_get_real_ns() usage.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-12 18:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-07 19:41 [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: conntrack: add conntrack event timestamp Florian Westphal
2024-11-08  0:09 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-08  1:33 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-08  6:34 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-12 18:25 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-11-15 13:46 Florian Westphal
2025-01-07 15:53 ` Florian Westphal
2025-01-08 23:48   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-01-09  0:31     ` Florian Westphal
2025-01-09 10:25       ` Antonio Ojea

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241112182553.GC28817@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=n.m.pinaeva@gmail.com \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.