All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Cc: <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>, <edumazet@google.com>,
	Mike Manning <mvrmanning@gmail.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<pholzing@redhat.com>, <santiago@redhat.com>,
	<willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net 2/2] datagram, udp: Set local address and rehash socket atomically against lookup
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 13:33:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241119133345.650672cc@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241115195521.63675-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>

On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 11:55:21 -0800
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> wrote:

> From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 22:54:14 +0100
> > diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> > index da50df485090..fcd2e2b89876 100644
> > --- a/net/core/sock.c
> > +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> > @@ -643,8 +643,17 @@ static int sock_bindtoindex_locked(struct sock *sk, int ifindex)
> >  	/* Paired with all READ_ONCE() done locklessly. */
> >  	WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_bound_dev_if, ifindex);
> >  
> > -	if (sk->sk_prot->rehash)
> > -		sk->sk_prot->rehash(sk);
> > +	/* Force rehash if protocol needs it */
> > +	if (sk->sk_prot->set_rcv_saddr) {
> > +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) && sk->sk_family == AF_INET6) {
> > +			sk->sk_prot->set_rcv_saddr(sk, &sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr);  
> 
> sk_v6_rcv_saddr is not defined without CONFIG_IPV6 so I think the
> compiler will complain ?  see net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c

You're right, it breaks the build for CONFIG_IPV6=n, I should have
checked. Fixed in v1.

I'll post it for net-next when it reopens.

> > +		} else if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET) {
> > +			struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(sk);
> > +
> > +			sk->sk_prot->set_rcv_saddr(sk, &inet->inet_rcv_saddr);  
> 
> simply use &sk->sk_rcv_saddr.

Changed.

> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	sk_dst_reset(sk);
> >  
> >  	ret = 0;  
> [...]
> > @@ -2034,20 +2052,32 @@ void udp_lib_rehash(struct sock *sk, u16 newhash)
> >  				nhslot2->count++;
> >  				spin_unlock(&nhslot2->lock);
> >  			}
> > -
> > -			spin_unlock_bh(&hslot->lock);
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > +
> > +	if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET)
> > +		sk->sk_rcv_saddr = *(__be32 *)addr;
> > +	else if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET6)
> > +		sk->sk_v6_rcv_saddr = *(struct in6_addr *)addr;  
> 
> inet_update_saddr() can be reused ?  at least we should
> use sk_rcv_saddr_set().

Ah, thanks, that's beautiful, I didn't know about inet_update_saddr().
Moved to headers and reused here.

It also updates sk_v6_rcv_saddr to the v4-mapped address if sk_family
is AF_INET, but that's correct anyway.

> Same for other places.

I think that makes sense but I guess it's beyond the scope of this
series, because it has the side effect of setting inet_saddr and
enabling further clean-ups. For example, in __ip4_datagram_connect(),
we could simplify all this:

	if (!inet->inet_saddr)
		inet->inet_saddr = fl4->saddr;	/* Update source address */
	if (!inet->inet_rcv_saddr) {
		inet->inet_rcv_saddr = fl4->saddr;
		if (sk->sk_prot->rehash)
			sk->sk_prot->rehash(sk);
	}

...let me do that as a follow-up patch. This series already looks big
enough.

-- 
Stefano


  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-19 12:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-14 21:54 [PATCH RFC net 0/2] Fix race between datagram socket address change and rehash Stefano Brivio
2024-11-14 21:54 ` [PATCH RFC net 1/2] datagram: Rehash sockets only if local address changed for their family Stefano Brivio
2024-11-15 17:48   ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-11-15 18:10     ` Stefano Brivio
2024-11-15 18:23       ` Stefano Brivio
2024-11-19 12:33         ` Stefano Brivio
2024-11-19 14:54           ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-11-14 21:54 ` [PATCH RFC net 2/2] datagram, udp: Set local address and rehash socket atomically against lookup Stefano Brivio
2024-11-15 17:50   ` Willem de Bruijn
2024-11-15 18:10     ` Stefano Brivio
2024-11-15 19:55   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2024-11-19 12:33     ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2024-11-17  6:40   ` kernel test robot
2024-11-15  3:01 ` [PATCH RFC net 0/2] Fix race between datagram socket address change and rehash David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241119133345.650672cc@elisabeth \
    --to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --cc=mvrmanning@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pholzing@redhat.com \
    --cc=santiago@redhat.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.