From: Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: jaegeuk@kernel.org
Cc: Xiuhong Wang <xiuhong.wang@unisoc.com>,
Zhiguo Niu <zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] f2fs: fix to shrink read extent node in batches
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 14:50:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241122065005.3772987-1-chao@kernel.org> (raw)
We use rwlock to protect core structure data of extent tree during
its shrink, however, if there is a huge number of extent nodes in
extent tree, during shrink of extent tree, it may hold rwlock for
a very long time, which may trigger kernel hang issue.
This patch fixes to shrink read extent node in batches, so that,
critical region of the rwlock can be shrunk to avoid its extreme
long time hold.
Reported-by: Xiuhong Wang <xiuhong.wang@unisoc.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20241112110627.1314632-1-xiuhong.wang@unisoc.com/
Signed-off-by: Xiuhong Wang <xiuhong.wang@unisoc.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhiguo Niu <zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com>
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
---
v2:
- no updates.
fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
index 019c1f7b7fa5..b7a6817b44b0 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
@@ -379,21 +379,22 @@ static struct extent_tree *__grab_extent_tree(struct inode *inode,
}
static unsigned int __free_extent_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
- struct extent_tree *et)
+ struct extent_tree *et, unsigned int nr_shrink)
{
struct rb_node *node, *next;
struct extent_node *en;
- unsigned int count = atomic_read(&et->node_cnt);
+ unsigned int count;
node = rb_first_cached(&et->root);
- while (node) {
+
+ for (count = 0; node && count < nr_shrink; count++) {
next = rb_next(node);
en = rb_entry(node, struct extent_node, rb_node);
__release_extent_node(sbi, et, en);
node = next;
}
- return count - atomic_read(&et->node_cnt);
+ return count;
}
static void __drop_largest_extent(struct extent_tree *et,
@@ -622,6 +623,30 @@ static struct extent_node *__insert_extent_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
return en;
}
+static unsigned int __destroy_extent_node(struct inode *inode,
+ enum extent_type type)
+{
+ struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
+ struct extent_tree *et = F2FS_I(inode)->extent_tree[type];
+ unsigned int nr_shrink = type == EX_READ ?
+ READ_EXTENT_CACHE_SHRINK_NUMBER :
+ AGE_EXTENT_CACHE_SHRINK_NUMBER;
+ unsigned int node_cnt = 0;
+
+ if (!et || !atomic_read(&et->node_cnt))
+ return 0;
+
+ while (atomic_read(&et->node_cnt)) {
+ write_lock(&et->lock);
+ node_cnt += __free_extent_tree(sbi, et, nr_shrink);
+ write_unlock(&et->lock);
+ }
+
+ f2fs_bug_on(sbi, atomic_read(&et->node_cnt));
+
+ return node_cnt;
+}
+
static void __update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode,
struct extent_info *tei, enum extent_type type)
{
@@ -760,9 +785,6 @@ static void __update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode,
}
}
- if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_NO_EXTENT))
- __free_extent_tree(sbi, et);
-
if (et->largest_updated) {
et->largest_updated = false;
updated = true;
@@ -780,6 +802,9 @@ static void __update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode,
out_read_extent_cache:
write_unlock(&et->lock);
+ if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_NO_EXTENT))
+ __destroy_extent_node(inode, EX_READ);
+
if (updated)
f2fs_mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode, true);
}
@@ -942,10 +967,14 @@ static unsigned int __shrink_extent_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int nr_shrink
list_for_each_entry_safe(et, next, &eti->zombie_list, list) {
if (atomic_read(&et->node_cnt)) {
write_lock(&et->lock);
- node_cnt += __free_extent_tree(sbi, et);
+ node_cnt += __free_extent_tree(sbi, et,
+ nr_shrink - node_cnt - tree_cnt);
write_unlock(&et->lock);
}
- f2fs_bug_on(sbi, atomic_read(&et->node_cnt));
+
+ if (atomic_read(&et->node_cnt))
+ goto unlock_out;
+
list_del_init(&et->list);
radix_tree_delete(&eti->extent_tree_root, et->ino);
kmem_cache_free(extent_tree_slab, et);
@@ -1084,23 +1113,6 @@ unsigned int f2fs_shrink_age_extent_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int nr_shrink
return __shrink_extent_tree(sbi, nr_shrink, EX_BLOCK_AGE);
}
-static unsigned int __destroy_extent_node(struct inode *inode,
- enum extent_type type)
-{
- struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
- struct extent_tree *et = F2FS_I(inode)->extent_tree[type];
- unsigned int node_cnt = 0;
-
- if (!et || !atomic_read(&et->node_cnt))
- return 0;
-
- write_lock(&et->lock);
- node_cnt = __free_extent_tree(sbi, et);
- write_unlock(&et->lock);
-
- return node_cnt;
-}
-
void f2fs_destroy_extent_node(struct inode *inode)
{
__destroy_extent_node(inode, EX_READ);
@@ -1109,7 +1121,6 @@ void f2fs_destroy_extent_node(struct inode *inode)
static void __drop_extent_tree(struct inode *inode, enum extent_type type)
{
- struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
struct extent_tree *et = F2FS_I(inode)->extent_tree[type];
bool updated = false;
@@ -1117,7 +1128,6 @@ static void __drop_extent_tree(struct inode *inode, enum extent_type type)
return;
write_lock(&et->lock);
- __free_extent_tree(sbi, et);
if (type == EX_READ) {
set_inode_flag(inode, FI_NO_EXTENT);
if (et->largest.len) {
@@ -1126,6 +1136,9 @@ static void __drop_extent_tree(struct inode *inode, enum extent_type type)
}
}
write_unlock(&et->lock);
+
+ __destroy_extent_node(inode, type);
+
if (updated)
f2fs_mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode, true);
}
--
2.40.1
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: jaegeuk@kernel.org
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
Xiuhong Wang <xiuhong.wang@unisoc.com>,
Zhiguo Niu <zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] f2fs: fix to shrink read extent node in batches
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 14:50:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241122065005.3772987-1-chao@kernel.org> (raw)
We use rwlock to protect core structure data of extent tree during
its shrink, however, if there is a huge number of extent nodes in
extent tree, during shrink of extent tree, it may hold rwlock for
a very long time, which may trigger kernel hang issue.
This patch fixes to shrink read extent node in batches, so that,
critical region of the rwlock can be shrunk to avoid its extreme
long time hold.
Reported-by: Xiuhong Wang <xiuhong.wang@unisoc.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20241112110627.1314632-1-xiuhong.wang@unisoc.com/
Signed-off-by: Xiuhong Wang <xiuhong.wang@unisoc.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhiguo Niu <zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com>
Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
---
v2:
- no updates.
fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
index 019c1f7b7fa5..b7a6817b44b0 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c
@@ -379,21 +379,22 @@ static struct extent_tree *__grab_extent_tree(struct inode *inode,
}
static unsigned int __free_extent_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
- struct extent_tree *et)
+ struct extent_tree *et, unsigned int nr_shrink)
{
struct rb_node *node, *next;
struct extent_node *en;
- unsigned int count = atomic_read(&et->node_cnt);
+ unsigned int count;
node = rb_first_cached(&et->root);
- while (node) {
+
+ for (count = 0; node && count < nr_shrink; count++) {
next = rb_next(node);
en = rb_entry(node, struct extent_node, rb_node);
__release_extent_node(sbi, et, en);
node = next;
}
- return count - atomic_read(&et->node_cnt);
+ return count;
}
static void __drop_largest_extent(struct extent_tree *et,
@@ -622,6 +623,30 @@ static struct extent_node *__insert_extent_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
return en;
}
+static unsigned int __destroy_extent_node(struct inode *inode,
+ enum extent_type type)
+{
+ struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
+ struct extent_tree *et = F2FS_I(inode)->extent_tree[type];
+ unsigned int nr_shrink = type == EX_READ ?
+ READ_EXTENT_CACHE_SHRINK_NUMBER :
+ AGE_EXTENT_CACHE_SHRINK_NUMBER;
+ unsigned int node_cnt = 0;
+
+ if (!et || !atomic_read(&et->node_cnt))
+ return 0;
+
+ while (atomic_read(&et->node_cnt)) {
+ write_lock(&et->lock);
+ node_cnt += __free_extent_tree(sbi, et, nr_shrink);
+ write_unlock(&et->lock);
+ }
+
+ f2fs_bug_on(sbi, atomic_read(&et->node_cnt));
+
+ return node_cnt;
+}
+
static void __update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode,
struct extent_info *tei, enum extent_type type)
{
@@ -760,9 +785,6 @@ static void __update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode,
}
}
- if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_NO_EXTENT))
- __free_extent_tree(sbi, et);
-
if (et->largest_updated) {
et->largest_updated = false;
updated = true;
@@ -780,6 +802,9 @@ static void __update_extent_tree_range(struct inode *inode,
out_read_extent_cache:
write_unlock(&et->lock);
+ if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_NO_EXTENT))
+ __destroy_extent_node(inode, EX_READ);
+
if (updated)
f2fs_mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode, true);
}
@@ -942,10 +967,14 @@ static unsigned int __shrink_extent_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int nr_shrink
list_for_each_entry_safe(et, next, &eti->zombie_list, list) {
if (atomic_read(&et->node_cnt)) {
write_lock(&et->lock);
- node_cnt += __free_extent_tree(sbi, et);
+ node_cnt += __free_extent_tree(sbi, et,
+ nr_shrink - node_cnt - tree_cnt);
write_unlock(&et->lock);
}
- f2fs_bug_on(sbi, atomic_read(&et->node_cnt));
+
+ if (atomic_read(&et->node_cnt))
+ goto unlock_out;
+
list_del_init(&et->list);
radix_tree_delete(&eti->extent_tree_root, et->ino);
kmem_cache_free(extent_tree_slab, et);
@@ -1084,23 +1113,6 @@ unsigned int f2fs_shrink_age_extent_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int nr_shrink
return __shrink_extent_tree(sbi, nr_shrink, EX_BLOCK_AGE);
}
-static unsigned int __destroy_extent_node(struct inode *inode,
- enum extent_type type)
-{
- struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
- struct extent_tree *et = F2FS_I(inode)->extent_tree[type];
- unsigned int node_cnt = 0;
-
- if (!et || !atomic_read(&et->node_cnt))
- return 0;
-
- write_lock(&et->lock);
- node_cnt = __free_extent_tree(sbi, et);
- write_unlock(&et->lock);
-
- return node_cnt;
-}
-
void f2fs_destroy_extent_node(struct inode *inode)
{
__destroy_extent_node(inode, EX_READ);
@@ -1109,7 +1121,6 @@ void f2fs_destroy_extent_node(struct inode *inode)
static void __drop_extent_tree(struct inode *inode, enum extent_type type)
{
- struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
struct extent_tree *et = F2FS_I(inode)->extent_tree[type];
bool updated = false;
@@ -1117,7 +1128,6 @@ static void __drop_extent_tree(struct inode *inode, enum extent_type type)
return;
write_lock(&et->lock);
- __free_extent_tree(sbi, et);
if (type == EX_READ) {
set_inode_flag(inode, FI_NO_EXTENT);
if (et->largest.len) {
@@ -1126,6 +1136,9 @@ static void __drop_extent_tree(struct inode *inode, enum extent_type type)
}
}
write_unlock(&et->lock);
+
+ __destroy_extent_node(inode, type);
+
if (updated)
f2fs_mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode, true);
}
--
2.40.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-11-22 6:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-22 6:50 Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel [this message]
2024-11-22 6:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] f2fs: fix to shrink read extent node in batches Chao Yu
2024-11-22 6:50 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] f2fs: add a sysfs node to limit max read extent count per-inode Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2024-11-22 6:50 ` Chao Yu
2024-11-23 15:50 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] f2fs: fix to shrink read extent node in batches patchwork-bot+f2fs--- via Linux-f2fs-devel
2024-11-23 15:50 ` patchwork-bot+f2fs
2024-11-25 3:11 ` [f2fs-dev] 答复: " 王秀红 (Xiuhong Wang)
2024-11-25 3:11 ` 王秀红 (Xiuhong Wang)
2024-11-25 11:13 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2024-11-25 11:13 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241122065005.3772987-1-chao@kernel.org \
--to=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiuhong.wang@unisoc.com \
--cc=zhiguo.niu@unisoc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.