From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
To: "Michael C. Pratt" <mcpratt@pm.me>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
"Michael C . Pratt" <mcpratt@pm.me>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
yu.c.chen@intel.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
aubrey.li@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
oliver.sang@intel.com, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
ltp@lists.linux.it, lkp@intel.com
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH RESEND 2 1/1] sched/syscalls: Allow setting niceness using sched_param struct
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:33:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202411252241.2d75c2f6-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241111070152.9781-2-mcpratt@pm.me>
Hello,
kernel test robot noticed "ltp.sched_get_priority_min01.fail" on:
commit: ecd04eb1e1d00bbd158b2f7d1353af709d8131a7 ("[PATCH RESEND 2 1/1] sched/syscalls: Allow setting niceness using sched_param struct")
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Michael-C-Pratt/sched-syscalls-Allow-setting-niceness-using-sched_param-struct/20241111-150517
base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git fe9beaaa802d44d881b165430b3239a9d7bebf30
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241111070152.9781-2-mcpratt@pm.me/
patch subject: [PATCH RESEND 2 1/1] sched/syscalls: Allow setting niceness using sched_param struct
in testcase: ltp
version: ltp-x86_64-14c1f76-1_20241111
with following parameters:
disk: 1HDD
fs: xfs
test: syscalls-07
config: x86_64-rhel-8.3-ltp
compiler: gcc-12
test machine: 4 threads 1 sockets Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3220 CPU @ 3.30GHz (Ivy Bridge) with 8G memory
(please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202411252241.2d75c2f6-lkp@intel.com
<<<test_start>>>
tag=sched_get_priority_min01 stime=1732078544
cmdline="sched_get_priority_min01"
contacts=""
analysis=exit
<<<test_output>>>
tst_test.c:1890: TINFO: LTP version: 20240930-63-g6408294d8
tst_test.c:1894: TINFO: Tested kernel: 6.12.0-rc4-00035-gecd04eb1e1d0 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sun Nov 17 15:27:30 CST 2024 x86_64
tst_test.c:1725: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 02m 30s
sched_get_priority_min01.c:42: TFAIL: SCHED_BATCH retval 100 != 0: SUCCESS (0)
sched_get_priority_min01.c:42: TPASS: SCHED_DEADLINE passed
sched_get_priority_min01.c:42: TPASS: SCHED_FIFO passed
sched_get_priority_min01.c:42: TPASS: SCHED_IDLE passed
sched_get_priority_min01.c:42: TFAIL: SCHED_OTHER retval 100 != 0: SUCCESS (0)
sched_get_priority_min01.c:42: TPASS: SCHED_RR passed
Summary:
passed 4
failed 2
broken 0
skipped 0
warnings 0
<<<execution_status>>>
initiation_status="ok"
duration=0 termination_type=exited termination_id=1 corefile=no
cutime=0 cstime=1
<<<test_end>>>
The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241125/202411252241.2d75c2f6-lkp@intel.com
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
To: "Michael C. Pratt" <mcpratt@pm.me>
Cc: <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev>, <lkp@intel.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <ltp@lists.linux.it>,
<aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>, <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
"Michael C . Pratt" <mcpratt@pm.me>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
<oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 2 1/1] sched/syscalls: Allow setting niceness using sched_param struct
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 22:33:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202411252241.2d75c2f6-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241111070152.9781-2-mcpratt@pm.me>
Hello,
kernel test robot noticed "ltp.sched_get_priority_min01.fail" on:
commit: ecd04eb1e1d00bbd158b2f7d1353af709d8131a7 ("[PATCH RESEND 2 1/1] sched/syscalls: Allow setting niceness using sched_param struct")
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Michael-C-Pratt/sched-syscalls-Allow-setting-niceness-using-sched_param-struct/20241111-150517
base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git fe9beaaa802d44d881b165430b3239a9d7bebf30
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241111070152.9781-2-mcpratt@pm.me/
patch subject: [PATCH RESEND 2 1/1] sched/syscalls: Allow setting niceness using sched_param struct
in testcase: ltp
version: ltp-x86_64-14c1f76-1_20241111
with following parameters:
disk: 1HDD
fs: xfs
test: syscalls-07
config: x86_64-rhel-8.3-ltp
compiler: gcc-12
test machine: 4 threads 1 sockets Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-3220 CPU @ 3.30GHz (Ivy Bridge) with 8G memory
(please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202411252241.2d75c2f6-lkp@intel.com
<<<test_start>>>
tag=sched_get_priority_min01 stime=1732078544
cmdline="sched_get_priority_min01"
contacts=""
analysis=exit
<<<test_output>>>
tst_test.c:1890: TINFO: LTP version: 20240930-63-g6408294d8
tst_test.c:1894: TINFO: Tested kernel: 6.12.0-rc4-00035-gecd04eb1e1d0 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sun Nov 17 15:27:30 CST 2024 x86_64
tst_test.c:1725: TINFO: Timeout per run is 0h 02m 30s
sched_get_priority_min01.c:42: TFAIL: SCHED_BATCH retval 100 != 0: SUCCESS (0)
sched_get_priority_min01.c:42: TPASS: SCHED_DEADLINE passed
sched_get_priority_min01.c:42: TPASS: SCHED_FIFO passed
sched_get_priority_min01.c:42: TPASS: SCHED_IDLE passed
sched_get_priority_min01.c:42: TFAIL: SCHED_OTHER retval 100 != 0: SUCCESS (0)
sched_get_priority_min01.c:42: TPASS: SCHED_RR passed
Summary:
passed 4
failed 2
broken 0
skipped 0
warnings 0
<<<execution_status>>>
initiation_status="ok"
duration=0 termination_type=exited termination_id=1 corefile=no
cutime=0 cstime=1
<<<test_end>>>
The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241125/202411252241.2d75c2f6-lkp@intel.com
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-25 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-11 7:02 [PATCH RESEND 2 0/1] sched/syscalls: Allow setting niceness using sched_param struct Michael C. Pratt
2024-11-11 7:03 ` [PATCH RESEND 2 1/1] " Michael C. Pratt
2024-11-12 15:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-11-13 0:13 ` Michael Pratt
2024-11-13 0:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-11-13 6:04 ` Michael Pratt
2024-11-13 14:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2024-11-25 14:33 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-11-25 14:33 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202411252241.2d75c2f6-lkp@intel.com \
--to=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=mcpratt@pm.me \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.