All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Long Li <leo.lilong@huawei.com>
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, cem@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com,
	houtao1@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] iomap: fix zero padding data issue in concurrent append writes
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2024 08:28:29 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241127162829.GY1926309@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241127063503.2200005-1-leo.lilong@huawei.com>

On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 02:35:02PM +0800, Long Li wrote:
> During concurrent append writes to XFS filesystem, zero padding data
> may appear in the file after power failure. This happens due to imprecise
> disk size updates when handling write completion.
> 
> Consider this scenario with concurrent append writes same file:
> 
>   Thread 1:                  Thread 2:
>   ------------               -----------
>   write [A, A+B]
>   update inode size to A+B
>   submit I/O [A, A+BS]
>                              write [A+B, A+B+C]
>                              update inode size to A+B+C
>   <I/O completes, updates disk size to min(A+B+C, A+BS)>
>   <power failure>
> 
> After reboot:
>   1) with A+B+C < A+BS, the file has zero padding in range [A+B, A+B+C]
> 
>   |<         Block Size (BS)      >|
>   |DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD0000000000000000|
>   ^               ^        ^
>   A              A+B     A+B+C
>                          (EOF)
> 
>   2) with A+B+C > A+BS, the file has zero padding in range [A+B, A+BS]
> 
>   |<         Block Size (BS)      >|<           Block Size (BS)    >|
>   |DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD0000000000000000|00000000000000000000000000000000|
>   ^               ^                ^               ^
>   A              A+B              A+BS           A+B+C
>                                   (EOF)
> 
>   D = Valid Data
>   0 = Zero Padding
> 
> The issue stems from disk size being set to min(io_offset + io_size,
> inode->i_size) at I/O completion. Since io_offset+io_size is block
> size granularity, it may exceed the actual valid file data size. In
> the case of concurrent append writes, inode->i_size may be larger
> than the actual range of valid file data written to disk, leading to
> inaccurate disk size updates.
> 
> This patch modifies the meaning of io_size to represent the size of
> valid data within EOF in an ioend. If the ioend spans beyond i_size,
> io_size will be trimmed to provide the file with more accurate size
> information. This is particularly useful for on-disk size updates
> at completion time.
> 
> After this change, ioends that span i_size will not grow or merge with
> other ioends in concurrent scenarios. However, these cases that need
> growth/merging rarely occur and it seems no noticeable performance impact.
> Although rounding up io_size could enable ioend growth/merging in these
> scenarios, we decided to keep the code simple after discussion [1].
> 
> Another benefit is that it makes the xfs_ioend_is_append() check more
> accurate, which can reduce unnecessary end bio callbacks of xfs_end_bio()
> in certain scenarios, such as repeated writes at the file tail without
> extending the file size.
> 
> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")

Er... filesystem iomap wasn't in 2.6.12, how did you come up with this?
At most this is a fix against a roughly 6.1 era kernel, right?

> Link[1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/xfs/patch/20241113091907.56937-1-leo.lilong@huawei.com
> Signed-off-by: Long Li <leo.lilong@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> ---
> v4->v5: remove iomap_ioend_size_aligned() and don't round up io_size for
> 	ioend growth/merging to keep the code simple. 
>  fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  include/linux/iomap.h  |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> index d42f01e0fc1c..dc360c8e5641 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> @@ -1774,6 +1774,7 @@ static int iomap_add_to_ioend(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc,
>  {
>  	struct iomap_folio_state *ifs = folio->private;
>  	size_t poff = offset_in_folio(folio, pos);
> +	loff_t isize = i_size_read(inode);
>  	int error;
>  
>  	if (!wpc->ioend || !iomap_can_add_to_ioend(wpc, pos)) {
> @@ -1789,7 +1790,16 @@ static int iomap_add_to_ioend(struct iomap_writepage_ctx *wpc,
>  
>  	if (ifs)
>  		atomic_add(len, &ifs->write_bytes_pending);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If the ioend spans i_size, trim io_size to the former to provide
> +	 * the fs with more accurate size information. This is useful for
> +	 * completion time on-disk size updates.

I think it's useful to preserve the diagram showing exactly what problem
you're solving:

	/*
	 * Clamp io_offset and io_size to the incore EOF so that ondisk
	 * file size updates in the ioend completion are byte-accurate.
	 * This avoids recovering files with zeroed tail regions when
	 * writeback races with appending writes:
	 *
	 *    Thread 1:                  Thread 2:
	 *    ------------               -----------
	 *    write [A, A+B]
	 *    update inode size to A+B
	 *    submit I/O [A, A+BS]
	 *                               write [A+B, A+B+C]
	 *                               update inode size to A+B+C
	 *    <I/O completes, updates disk size to min(A+B+C, A+BS)>
	 *    <power failure>
	 *
	 *  After reboot:
	 *    1) with A+B+C < A+BS, the file has zero padding in range
	 *       [A+B, A+B+C]
	 *
	 *    |<     Block Size (BS)    >|
	 *    |DDDDDDDDDDDD00000000000000|
	 *    ^           ^        ^
	 *    A          A+B     A+B+C
	 *                       (EOF)
	 *
	 *    2) with A+B+C > A+BS, the file has zero padding in range
	 *       [A+B, A+BS]
	 *
	 *    |<     Block Size (BS)    >|<      Block Size (BS)    >|
	 *    |DDDDDDDDDDDD00000000000000|000000000000000000000000000|
	 *    ^           ^              ^           ^
	 *    A          A+B            A+BS       A+B+C
	 *                              (EOF)
	 *
	 *    D = Valid Data
	 *    0 = Zero Padding
	 *
	 * Note that this defeats the ability to chain the ioends of
	 * appending writes.
	 */

(I reduced the blocksize a bit for wrapping purposes)

The logic looks ok, but I'm curious about how you landed at 2.6.12-rc
for the fixes tag.

--D

> +	 */
>  	wpc->ioend->io_size += len;
> +	if (wpc->ioend->io_offset + wpc->ioend->io_size > isize)
> +		wpc->ioend->io_size = isize - wpc->ioend->io_offset;
> +
>  	wbc_account_cgroup_owner(wbc, folio, len);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/include/linux/iomap.h b/include/linux/iomap.h
> index 5675af6b740c..75bf54e76f3b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iomap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iomap.h
> @@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ struct iomap_ioend {
>  	u16			io_type;
>  	u16			io_flags;	/* IOMAP_F_* */
>  	struct inode		*io_inode;	/* file being written to */
> -	size_t			io_size;	/* size of the extent */
> +	size_t			io_size;	/* size of data within eof */
>  	loff_t			io_offset;	/* offset in the file */
>  	sector_t		io_sector;	/* start sector of ioend */
>  	struct bio		io_bio;		/* MUST BE LAST! */
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-27 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-27  6:35 [PATCH v5 1/2] iomap: fix zero padding data issue in concurrent append writes Long Li
2024-11-27  6:35 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] xfs: clean up xfs_end_ioend() to reuse local variables Long Li
2024-11-27 16:07   ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-11-27 16:28 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2024-11-28  6:38   ` [PATCH v5 1/2] iomap: fix zero padding data issue in concurrent append writes Long Li
2024-11-28  3:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-11-30 13:39 ` Long Li
2024-12-02 15:26   ` Brian Foster
2024-12-03  2:08     ` Dave Chinner
2024-12-03 14:54       ` Brian Foster
2024-12-03 21:12         ` Dave Chinner
2024-12-04 12:05           ` Brian Foster
2024-12-04  9:06         ` Long Li
2024-12-04 12:05           ` Brian Foster
2024-12-06  3:36             ` Long Li
2024-12-04  9:00       ` Long Li
2024-12-04 12:17         ` Brian Foster
2024-12-05 12:47           ` Long Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241127162829.GY1926309@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=leo.lilong@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.